No CrossRef data available.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 24 December 2009
In the phonological development of a language the shortening and loss of vowels are usually ascribed to the absence of stress-accent on the syllables containing those vowels. When in their study of Prakrit Phonology Drs. Pischel and Jacobi found numerous instances of the loss and shortening of vowels, they explained them in the light of stress-accent. The one supposed that the musical accent of Vedic also acted like stress, while the other assumed that after the pitch-accent had died out, a stress-accent developed in Sanskrit and Prakrit which was placed on the penultimate or ante-penultimate syllable as in Latin. Now about the nature, history, and even the very existence of stress-accent in PI or its subsequent stages nothing certain is known. The Prātiśākhyas and Śiksās are silent on this point. The reason of their silence may be that perhaps the stress-accent originally fell on the same syllable as the pitch-accent and was not strong enough to draw attention. The following remarks of Dr. P. Giles and Professor D. Jones lend great support to the probability of this surmise:—
page 316 note 1 Giles, P., Manual of Comparative Philology, 1901, § 93.Google ScholarTucker, T. G.Introduction to the Natural History of Language, London, 1908, pp. 340–6.Google Scholar
page 316 note 2 Grammatik der Prakritsprachen, passim.
page 316 note 3 ZDMG., vol. xlvii, pp. 574 ff.Google Scholar
page 316 note 4 For stress-accent in Latin and its effects on the subsequent development of the language see Lindsay, W. M., Latin Language, Oxford, 1894, chap, iii, pp. 148–218.Google Scholar
page 316 note 5 Giles, P., op. cit., § 91.Google Scholar
page 316 note 6 Trofimov, M. V. and Jones, D., Pronunciation of Russian, 1923, § 763.Google Scholar
page 316 note 7 La langue marathe, § 32 ff.Google Scholar
page 317 note 1 ZDMG., vol. xlix, pp. 393 ff., vol. 1, pp. 1 ff.Google Scholar
page 317 note 2 These words do not actually occur in his essay, but there are others of this kind, e.g. haridriká, §§ 15, 17; Kutumbam, § 23; araghatta-, § 35; vijñaptikd, § 35; udvartanam, § 84; paryasta-, § 84, etc.
page 318 note 1 In Sanskrit words the accent-mark denotes the Vedic accent. The syllable schemes refer to the Prakrit forms.
To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.
To save this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.
To save this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.