Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T18:06:27.707Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Poly-functionality of the preverbal “acquire” in the Nanning Yue dialect of Chinese: an areal perspective*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 March 2011

Kwok Bit-Chee ,
Andy C. Chin  and
Benjamin K. Tsou
Kwok Bit-Chee*
Affiliation:
City University of Hong Kong
Andy C. Chin*
Affiliation:
The Hong Kong Institute of Education
Benjamin K. Tsou*
Affiliation:
The Hong Kong Institute of Education
*
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper aims to explore the origin and to reconstruct the path of the development of a preverbal element, glossed as ACQ here, in the Nanning Yue dialect (NY) spoken in the Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region in south-western China. Apart from being a full verb meaning “acquire”, this morpheme can also appear in preverbal and post-verbal positions, expressing different modalities. It is argued that the preverbal ACQ in Early Cantonese (i.e. the ancestral language of modern Cantonese spoken in the Pearl River Delta as well as NY) is relatively non-productive, and this leads us to consider that the emergence of this peculiar grammatical element in modern NY might involve external factors. One possible such factor is language contact. Specifically, we argue that the new readings derived from the preverbal ACQ in NY were transferred from Zhuang, the most common non-Sinitic language of the Tai-Kadai family in Guangxi, by contact-induced interference.

Type
Articles
Information
Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies , Volume 74 , Issue 1 , February 2011 , pp. 119 - 137
Copyright
Copyright © School of Oriental and African Studies 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

The first draft of this paper was presented at “The 16th Annual Meeting of the International Association of Chinese Linguistics” (IACL-16) hosted by Peking University on 29 May–1 June 2008. We would like to thank Samuel H.-N. Cheung 張洪年, Shin Kataoka 片岡新, Thomas H.-T. Lee 李行德, Huayong Lin 林華勇, Yi Lin 林亦, Fengyu Qin 覃鳳余, Rint Sybesma, Fuxiang Wu 吳福祥, Chusheng Zhuang 莊初昇, and the anonymous reviewer for providing valuable comments and information. Of course, all errors are our sole responsibility. This study is supported partly by a grant from the Hong Kong Research Grant Council (CityU 144507/07).

Abbreviations: 1 sg. – first person singular, 2 sg. – second person singular, 3 sg. – third person singular, asp. – aspect marker, cl. – classifier, det. – determiner, foc. – focus, neg. – negation, part. – particle, prep. – preposition.

References

Aikhenvald, A. Y. 2006. “Grammars in contact: a cross-linguistic perspective”, in Aikhenvald, A. Y. and Dixon, R. M. W. (eds), Grammars in Contact: A Cross-Linguistic Typology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1–66.Google Scholar
Ansaldo, Umberto. 2004. “Contact, typology and the speaker: the essentials of language”, Language Sciences 26, 485–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Auwera, Johan van der and Plungian, V. A.. 1998. “Modality's semantic map”, Linguistic Typology 2, 79–124.Google Scholar
Bauer, Robert. 1996. “Identifying the Tai substratum in Cantonese”, in Pan-Asiatic Linguistics: Proceedings of the Fourth International Symposium on Language and Linguistics, volume 5. Salaya: Institute of Language and Culture for Rural Development, Mahidol University, 1806–44.Google Scholar
Benedict, P. K. 1972. Sino-Tibetan: A Conspectus. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benedict, P. K. 1975. Austro-Tai Language and Culture, with a Glossary of Roots. New Haven, CT: HRAF Press.Google Scholar
Bisang, Walter. 2004. “Grammaticalization without coevolution of form and meaning: the case of tense-aspect-modality in East and Mainland Southeast Asia”, in Bisang, Walter, Himmelmann, Nikolaus and Wiemer, Björn (eds), What Makes Grammaticalization? – A Look from Its Fringes and Its Components. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 109–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonney, S. W. 1854. A Vocabulary with Colloquial Phrases of the Canton Dialect. Canton: Office of the Chinese Repository.Google Scholar
Bridgman, E. C. 1841. A Chinese Chrestomathy in the Canton Dialect. Macao: S. W. Williams.Google Scholar
Bybee, Joan, Perkins, Revere and Pagliuca, William. 1994. The Evolution of Grammar: Tense, Aspect and Modality in the Languages of the World. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Chao, Yuen-Ren. 1968. A Grammar of Spoken Chinese. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Chen, Baoya. 2005. “Yuyan jiechu daozhi hanyu fangyan fenhua de liangzhong moshi” 語言接觸導致漢語方言分化的兩種模式, Journal of Peking University (Philosophy and Social Sciences) 42/2, 43–50.Google Scholar
Chen, Hailun and Li, Lianjin (eds). 2005. Guangxi yuyan wenzi shiyong wenti diaocha yu yanjiu 廣西語言文字使用問題調查與研究. Nanning: Guangxi Education Publishing House.Google Scholar
Dixon, R. M. W. 1997. The Rise and Fall of Languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Du, Yi. 2007. “‘De + VP’ jiegou zai weijin nanbeichao de fazhan – jiantan ‘V de C’ jiegou de laiyuan wenti” 「得 + VP」結構在魏晉南北朝的發展 – 兼談「V 得 C」結構的來源問題, in Shen, Jiaxuan, Wu, Fuxiang and Li, Zongjiang (eds), Yufa yu yufahua yanjiu (3) 語法與語法化研究 (三). Beijing: Commercial Press, 1–35.Google Scholar
Deng, Yurong. 2008. “Guangxi zhuangzu zizhiqu geminzu yuyanjian de xianghu yingxiang” 廣西壯族自治區各民族語言間的相互影響, Fangyan 3, 204–15.Google Scholar
Enfield, N. J. 2001. “On genetic and areal linguistics in mainland South-East Asia: parallel polyfunctionality of ‘acquire’”, in Aikhenvald, A. Y. and Dixon, R. M. W. (eds), Areal Diffusion and Genetic Inheritance: Problems in Comparative Linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 255–90.Google Scholar
Enfield, N. J. 2003. Linguistic Epidemiology: Semantics and Grammar of Language Contact in Mainland Southeast Asia. London and New York: Routledge Curzon.Google Scholar
Hagège, Claude. 1993. The Language Builder: An Essay on the Human Signature in Linguistic Morphogenesis. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Heine, Bernd and Kuteva, Tania. 2005. Language Contact and Grammatical Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hong, Bo. 2004. “Zhuangyu yu hanyu de jiechu shi ji jiechu leixing” 壯語與漢語的接觸史及接觸類型, in Shi, Feng and Shen, Zhongwei (eds), The Joy of Research: A Festschrift in Honour of Professor William S-Y. Wang on His Seventieth Birthday. Tianjin: Nankai University Press, 104–20.Google Scholar
Kwok, Bit-Chee. 2010. “Yuyan jiechuzhongde yufa bianfa: lun nanning yueyu ‘shuyu + binyu + buyu’ jiegou de laiyuan” 語言接觸中的語法變化 : 論南寧粵語 「述語 + 賓語 + 補語」 的來源, in H.-N. S. Cheung and S. H. Chang (eds), Diachronic Change and Language Contact – Dialects in South East China. Hong Kong: The Chinese University of Hong Kong, 201–16.Google Scholar
LaPolla, Randy. 2001. “The role of migration and language contact in the development of the Sino-Tibetan language family”, in Aikhenvald, A. Y. and Dixon, R. M. W. (eds), Areal Diffusion and Genetic Inheritance: Problems in Comparative Linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 225–54.Google Scholar
Li, Jinfang. 2000. “Yueyu xijian ji yu zhuangdongyu jiechu de guocheng” 粵語西漸及與壯侗語接觸的過程, in Sin, Chow-Yiu and Luke, Kang-Kwong (eds), Diqijie guoji yuefangyan yantaohui lunwenji 第七屆國際粵方言研討會論文集. Beijing: Commercial Press, 62–75.Google Scholar
Li, Fang-Kuei. 1956 / 2005. Wuming tuhua 武鳴土話. Beijing: Tsing Hua University Press.Google Scholar
Lin, Yi and Qin, Fengyu. 2008. Guangxi nanning baihua yanjiu 廣西南寧白話研究. Guilin: Guangxi Normal University Press.Google Scholar
Liu, Li. 2000. Xianqin hanyu zhudongci yanjiu 先秦漢語助動詞研究. Beijing: Beijing Normal University Press.Google Scholar
Luke, Kang-kwong. 1999. “Yueyu ‘de’ zi de yongfa” 粵語「得」字的用法, Fangyan 3, 215–20.Google Scholar
Matthews, Stephen. 2006. “Cantonese grammar in areal perspective”, in Aikhenvald, A. Y. and Dixon, R. M. W. (eds), Grammars in Contact: A Cross-Linguistic Typology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 220–36.Google Scholar
Matthews, Stephen and Yip, Virginia. 1994. Cantonese: A Comprehensive Grammar. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Mei, Tsu-lin and Gong, Hwang-Cherng. 1992. “Shangguyin duitanlu” 上古音對談錄, in Chinese Language and Linguistics I: Chinese Dialects. Taipei: Institute of History and Philology, Academia Sinica, 665–719.Google Scholar
Morrison, Robert. 1828. Vocabulary of the Canton Dialect. Macao: East India Company Press.Google Scholar
Ōta, Tatsuo. 1958 / 2003. Zhongguoyu lishi wenfa 中國語歷史文法 (Chinese version translated by Shaoyu Jiang and Changhua Xu). Beijing: Peking University Press.Google Scholar
Ouyang, Jueya. 1995. “Liangguang yuefangyan yu zhuangyu de zhongzhong guanxi” 兩廣粵方言與壯語的種種關係, Minzu Yuwen 6, 49–52.Google Scholar
Palmer, F. R. 2001. Mood and Modality (Second Edition). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peyraube, Alain. 1999. “On the modal auxiliaries of possibility in Classical Chinese”, in Wang, H. Samuel, Tsao, Feng-Fu and Lien, Chin-Fa (eds), Selected Papers from the Fifth International Conference on Chinese Linguistics. Taipei: Crane Publishing, 27–52.Google Scholar
Pulleyblank, E. G. 1995. Outline of Classical Chinese Grammar. Vancouver: UBC Press.Google Scholar
Strecker, David. 1990. “Tai languages”, in Comrie, Bernard (ed.), The Major Languages of East and South-East Asia. London: Routledge, 19–28.Google Scholar
Sun, Chaofen. 1996. Word-Order Change and Grammaticalization in the History of Chinese. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Sun, Chaofen. 2006. Chinese: A Linguistic Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sybesma, Rint. 2008. “Zhuang: a Tai language with some Sinitic characteristics. Post-verbal ‘can’ in Zhuang, Cantonese, Vietnamese and Lao”, in Muysken, Pieter (ed.), From Linguistic Areas to Areal Linguistics. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 221–74.Google Scholar
Thomason, Sarah. 2001. Language Contact. Washington D.C.: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Traugott, E. C. 1989. “On the rise of epistemic meanings in English: an example of subjectification in semantic change”, Language 65, 31–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tsou, Benjamin K., Chin, Andy C., Mok, Kenny Y. and Kwok, Bit-Chee. 2009. “Guangxi diqu ‘yuyan piaoli’ he ‘yuyan zhuanyi’ xianxiang yu yuyan binwei tansuo” 廣西地區「語言飄離」和「語言轉移」現象與語言瀕危探索, paper presented at the International Symposium on Endangered Dialects, Guangzhou, November 2009.Google Scholar
Tsuji, Nobuhisa. 1980. Comparative Phonology of Guangxi Yue Dialects. Tokyo: Kamaza Shobo Publishing Co.Google Scholar
Wu, Fuxiang. 2007. “Guanyu yuyan jiechu yinfa de yanbian” 關於語言接觸引發的演變, Minzu yuwen 2, 3–23.Google Scholar
Wu, Yunji. 2005. A Synchronic and Diachronic Study of the Grammar of the Chinese Xiang Dialects. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Xie, Jianyou. 2007. Guangxi hanyu fangyan yanjiu 廣西漢語方言研究. Nanning: Guangxi People's Publishing House.Google Scholar
Yang, Jingyu. 2006. Qingmo yuefangyan yufa ji qi fazhan yanjiu 清末粵方言語法及其發展研究. Guangzhou: Guangdong People's Publishing House.Google Scholar
Yang, Ping. 2001. “Zhudongci ‘de’ de chansheng he fazhan” 助動詞「得」的產生和發展, Yuyanxue luncong 23, 122–44.Google Scholar
Yue(-Hashimoto), Anne. 1988. “A preliminary investigation into the subclassification problem of the Yue dialects”, Computational Analyses of Asian and African Languages 30, 7–41.Google Scholar
Yue(-Hashimoto), Anne. 1991. “The Yue dialect”, in Wang, William S.-Y. (ed.), Languages and Dialects of China. Berkeley: Project on Linguistic Analysis, 294–324.Google Scholar
Yue(-Hashimoto), Anne. 2001. “The verb complement construction in historical perspective with special reference to Cantonese”, in Chappell, Hilary (ed.), Sinitic Grammar: Synchronic and Diachronic Perspectives. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 232–65.Google Scholar
Yue(-Hashimoto), Anne. 2004. “Materials for the diachronic study of the Yue dialects”, in Shi, Feng and Shen, Zhongwei (eds), The Joy of Research: A Festschrift in Honour of Professor William S.-Y. Wang on His Seventieth Birthday. Tianjin: Nankai University Press, 246–71.Google Scholar
Zhang, Junru et al. 1999. Zhuangyu fangyan yanjiu 壯語方言研究. Chengdu: Sichuan Nationalities Publishing House.Google Scholar