Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T20:38:04.226Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The origins of Bintulu 6, d1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 December 2009

Extract

Bintulu, an Austronesian language spoken in the district capital of that name and in several smaller communities in the basin of the Kemena river, Fourth Division, Sarawak, has two previously unrecognized implosive stop phonemes, 6 and d. Where these segments occur in lexical items known to reflect a Proto-Austronesian (PAN) reconstruction, they appear to result from an unconditioned phonemic split of PAN *b, *d, *D, or *j. A hypothesis constructed to account for a wider range of linguistic facts offers an explanation of some of these apparent irregularities. Most if not all residual discrepancies can be accommodated under an ancillary hypothesis of borrowing, independently motivated by various considerations. The case of the Bintulu implosives is of general theoretical interest, as it necessitates modifications in some recent claims regarding the diachronic sources of implosive stops.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © School of Oriental and African Studies 1973

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Blood, D. W. 1962. ‘Reflexes of Proto-Malayo-Polynesian in Cham’, Anthropological Linguistics, IV, 9, 1120.Google Scholar
Blust, R. A. 1969. ‘Some new Proto-Austronesian trisyllables’, Oceanic Linguistics, VIII, 2, 85104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blust, R. A. 1970. ‘Proto-Austronesian addenda’, Oceanic Linguistics, IX, 2, 104–62.Google Scholar
Clayre, I. F. C. S. 1971. ‘The spelling of Melanau (née Milano)’, Sarawak Museum Journal, XVIII, 1, 36–7; XVIII, 4, 330–52.Google Scholar
Dempwolff, O. 19341938. Vergleichende Lautlehre des austronesischen Wortschatzes. (Zeitschrifi für Eingeborenen-Sprachen, Beihefte 15, 17, 19.) Berlin: Dietrich Reimer.Google Scholar
Dyen, I. 1951. ‘Proto-Malayo-Polynesian *Z’, Language, XXVII, 4, 534–40.Google Scholar
Dyen, I. 1953a. ‘Dempwolff's *R’, Language, XXIX, 3, 359–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dyen, I. 1953b. The Proto-Malayo-Polynesian laryngeals. Baltimore: Lmguistio Society of America.Google Scholar
Dyen, I. 1965. ‘Formosan evidence for some new Proto-Austronesian phonemes’, Lingua, XIV, 285305.Google Scholar
Greenberg, J. H. 1970. ‘Some generalizations concerning glottalic consonants, especially implosives’, IJAL, XXXVI, 2, 123–45.Google Scholar
Hall, D. G. E. 1964. A history of South-East Asia. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Haudricourt, A.-G. 1950. ‘Les consonnes préglottalisées en Indochine’, BSLP, XLVI, 1, 172–82.Google Scholar
Lafont, P.-B. 1968. Lexique jarai. Paris: École Françhise d'Extrême-Orient.Google Scholar
Morris, H. S. 1953. Report on a Melanau sago producing community in Sarawak. (Colonial Research Studies, 9.) London: Her Majesty's Stationery Office for the Colonial Office.Google Scholar
Pittman, R. S. 1959. ‘Jarai as a member of the Malayo-Polynesian family of languages’, Asian Culture, I, 4, 5966.Google Scholar
Ray, S. H. 1913. ‘The languages of Borneo’, Sarawak Museum Journal, I, 4, 1196.Google Scholar
Roth, H. Ling. 1896. The natives of Sarawak and British North Borneo. London: Truslove and Hanson.Google Scholar
Scott, N. C. 1956. A dictionary of Sea Dayak. London: School of Oriental and African Studies, University of London.Google Scholar
Thomas, D. M. 1963. ‘Proto-Malayo-Polynesian reflexes in Rade, Jarai and Chru’, Studies in Linguistics, XVII, 5975.Google Scholar
Wang, W. S.-Y. 1968. The basis of speech. (Project on Linguistic Analysis, Reports, Second Series, No. 4.) Berkeley: Phonology Laboratory, Dept. of Linguistics, University of California at Berkeley.Google Scholar
Wilkinson, R. J. 1955. A Malay-English dictionary (romanised). London: Macmillan.Google Scholar