Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T05:55:20.910Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On pre-Tibetan semi-vowels1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 June 2013

Guillaume Jacques
Guillaume Jacques*
Affiliation:
CNRS, Paris
*
[email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The present paper discusses the synchronic status and the origin of the semi-vowels /j/ and /w/ in Old Tibetan on the basis of modern Tibetan languages and other Sino-Tibetan languages, in particular Rgyalrong and Lolo-Burmese.

Keywords

Old TibetanPhonologySesquisyllableRgyalrongJaphugSemi-vowels
Type
Articles
Information
Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies , Volume 76 , Issue 2 , June 2013 , pp. 289 - 300
Copyright
Copyright © School of Oriental and African Studies 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

1

I would like to thank Nathan Hill, Gwendolyn Hyslop, Jackson T.S. Sun and Bettina Zeisler for useful comments on this paper. I remain responsible for any remaining mistakes. Situ data is from Huang and Sun (2000), Japhug from personal fieldwork (Jacques 2008) and Tangut from Li (1997). The transcription of Old Tibetan is given here according to the system presented in Jacques (2012). The names of the sound laws follow Hill's (2011a) terminology.

References

Baxter, William and Sagart, Laurent. 2010. Baxter-Sagart Old Chinese reconstruction (Version 1.00). http://crlao.ehess.fr/document.php?id=1217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benedict, Paul K. 1972. Sino-Tibetan: A Conspectus. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bradley, David. 1979. Proto-Loloish. (Scandinavian Institute of Asian Studies Monograph Series 39.) London and Malmö: Curzon Press.Google Scholar
Van Driem, George and Tshering, Karma. 1998. Dzongkha. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Gong, Hwangcherng. 1977. 古藏文的y及其相关问题 (Ancient Tibetan y and related questions), Bulletin of the Institute of History and Philology, Academia Sinica, 48/2, 205–28.Google Scholar
Handel, Zev. 2010. Old Chinese Medials and their Sino-Tibetan Origins: A Comparative Study. Taipei: Academia Sinica.Google Scholar
Hill, Nathan W. 2005. “The verb ‘bri ‘to write’ in Old Tibetan”, Journal of Asian and African Studies, 68, 177–82.Google Scholar
Hill, Nathan W. 2006. “Tibetan vwa ‘fox’ and the sound change Tibeto-Burman *wa -> Old Tibetan o”, Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area, 29/2, 75–90.Google Scholar
Hill, Nathan W. 2010. A Lexicon of Tibetan Verb Stems as Reported by the Grammatical Tradition. (Studia Tibetica.) Munich: Bayerische Akademie der Wissenschaften.Google Scholar
Hill, Nathan W. 2011a. “Multiple origins of Tibetan o”, Language and Linguistics, 12/3, 707–21.Google Scholar
Hill, Nathan W. 2011b. “An inventory of Tibetan sound laws”, Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society of Great Britain & Ireland (Third Series), 21/4, 441–57.Google Scholar
Hill, Nathan W. 2012a. “Tibetan palatalization and the gy versus g.y distinction”, in Hill, N.W. (ed.), Medieval Tibeto-Burman Languages IV. Leiden: Brill, 383–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hill, Nathan W. 2012b. “Three notes on Laufer's law”, Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area, 35/2.Google Scholar
Liangrong, Huang 黄良荣 and Hongkai, Sun 孙宏开. 2002. 汉嘉戎词典 Hàn Jiāróng cídiǎn (A Chinese–rGyalrong dictionary). Běijīng: Mínzú chūbǎnshè.Google Scholar
Hyslop, Gwendolyn. 2011. “A grammar of Kurtöp”, PhD Dissertation, University of Oregon.Google Scholar
Hyslop, Gwendolyn. Forthcoming. On the internal phylogeny of East Bodish.Google Scholar
Jacques, Guillaume 向柏霖. 2008. 嘉絨語研究Jiāróngyǔ yánjiū (Study of the Rgyalrong Language). Běijīng: 民族出版社 Mínzǔ Chūbǎnshè.Google Scholar
Jacques, Guillaume. 2009. “Tibetan wa-zur and Laufer's law”, Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area, 32/1, 141–4.Google Scholar
Jacques, Guillaume. 2010. “A possible trace of verbal agreement in Tibetan”, Himalayan Linguistics 9/1, 41–9.Google Scholar
Jacques, Guillaume. 2011. “A panchronic study of aspirated fricatives, with new evidence from Pumi”, Lingua 121/9, 1518–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacques, Guillaume. 2012. “A new transcription system for Old and Classical Tibetan”, Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area, 35/2, 85–96.Google Scholar
Jacques, Guillaume. Forthcoming. “Cone”, in Sun, Jackson T.-S. (ed.), Phonological Profiles of Little-Studied Dialects of Modern Tibetan, Volume I (Language and Linguistics Monograph Series).Google Scholar
Jäschke, Heinrich August. 1881. Tibetan English Dictionary. London: Unger Brothers.Google Scholar
Li Fanwen 李範文. 1997. 《夏漢字典》 Xia-Han zidian (Xixia–Chinese Dictionary). Beijing: 中國社會科學出版社 Zhongguo shehui kexue chubanshe.Google Scholar
Matisoff, James A. 2003. Handbook of Proto-Tibeto-Burman. Berkeley: California University Press.Google Scholar
Michaud, Alexis. 2012. “Monosyllabicization: patterns of evolution in Asian languages”, in Nau, Nicole, Stolz, Thomas and Stroh, Cornelia (eds), Monosyllables: From Phonology to Typology. Berlin: Akademie Verlag, 115–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sagart, Laurent and Baxter, William H.. 2009. “Reconstructing Old Chinese uvulars in the Baxter-Sagart system (Version 0.99)”, Cahiers de Linguistique – Asie Orientale, 38/2, 221–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sun, Jackson T.-S. 2000. “Parallelisms in the verb morphology of Sidaba rGyalrong and Guanyinqiao in rGyalrongic”, Language & Linguistics 1/1, 161–90.Google Scholar
Uray, Géza. 1955. “On the Tibetan letters ba and wa: contribution to the origin and history of the Tibetan alphabet”, Acta Orientalia Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae 5/1, 101–21.Google Scholar
Walleser, Max. 1926. Zur Aussprache des Sanskrit und Tibetischen. (Materialien zur Kunde des Buddhismus 11.) Heidelberg: O. Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
Zadoks, Abel. 2002. “The Tibetan connection”, Himalayan Languages Symposium 7, September 7-9, 2001. Uppsala, Sweden.Google Scholar