Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T06:08:19.223Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Notes on Lugale1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 December 2009

M. J. Geller
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The method of editing Sumerian literary texts has been the subject of heated debate in recent years. It used to be that Sumerian text editions followed the practice of classical philologists, giving the text with an apparatus criticus of manuscript variants, but this method has an inherent flaw: the editor must either choose to use as his main text an ‘eclectic text’ combining the best readings of all the manuscripts, or select one manuscript as the best version. Moreover, although the apparatus may reveal manuscript variants, it often does not inform the reader of how much of any one line is preserved in any one text. Since Sumerian literary texts may show a considerable number of variants between duplicates, the Partitur format has been proposed and utilized, in which every line of every manuscript is given in full, although the system has been opposed on grounds of waste of space.

Type
Articles
Information
Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies , Volume 48 , Issue 2 , June 1985 , pp. 215 - 223
Copyright
Copyright © School of Oriental and African Studies, University of London 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

2 Powell, M. A., ZA, 68, 1978, 167CrossRefGoogle Scholar f., following the suggestion of Edzard, D. O. in Or., 43, 1974, 105–7.Google Scholar

3 Black, J. A., Afo, 27, 1980, 156.Google Scholar

4 Although van Dijk did not read the last two signs, the reading ⌌nir-gál⌍ seems clear on the copy, and fits well with the context.

5 The final sign (read NI by van Dijk) has the shape of a Middle Assyrian sa sign, although only two verticals are clearly visible within the horizontal wedges.

6 The author wishes to thank W. G. Lambert, R. Borger, and I. L. Finkel for numbers of these fragments, and the Trustees of the British Museum for permission to publish them here.