Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T08:12:54.422Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Khargāh: an inquiry into the spread of the “Turkish” trellis tent within the ʿAbbāsid world up to the Saljūq conquest (mid second/eighth–early fifth/eleventh centuries)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 March 2016

David Durand-Guédy
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The Persian term khargāh is first attested at the beginning of the fourth/tenth century. It has often been translated as “hut” or “pavilion”, but a comprehensive overview of the historical, geographical and poetic sources points to a more precise definition. Three main conclusions can be established. First, from the beginning the term exclusively referred to the trellis tent (commonly known as yurt) first identified in a Turkic milieu in Inner Asia. Second, khargāh entered the Arabic and Persian languages through the Sāmānid court and quickly replaced the Arabic expression al-qubba al-turkiyya which was previously used to refer to this kind of tent. Third, the presence of the trellis tent in Muslim courts predates the arrival of the nomadic Saljuqs in the fifth/eleventh century. The trellis tent, associated with the cloth enclosure (or sarāparda), was already a status symbol under the Sāmānids and Būyids in the fourth/tenth century. Thus this study, which lies at the crossroads of lexicography and the history of technology, provides new elements towards a better understanding of Central Asian cultural influence on the wider ‘Abbāsid world.

Keywords

TurksCentral AsiaCultural influencePre-Saljuq IranTentStatus symbol
Type
Articles
Information
Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies , Volume 79 , Issue 1 , February 2016 , pp. 57 - 85
Copyright
Copyright © SOAS, University of London 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Andrews, Peter A. 1997. Nomad Tent Types in the Middle East, part I: Framed Tents, 2 vols. (Beihefte zum Tübinger Atlas des Vorderen Orients.) Wiesbaden: Dr. Ludwig Reichert Verlag.Google Scholar
Andrews, Peter A. 1999. Felt Tents and Pavilions: The Nomadic Tradition and Its Interaction with Princely Tentage, 2 vols. London: Melisende.Google Scholar
Ṭūsī, Asadī. 1319sh. Lughat-i furs (ed. Iqbāl-Ashtiyānī, ʿAbbās). Tehran: Chāp-khāna-yi Majlis.Google Scholar
Azarnoush, Azartash. 2008. “Les emprunts persans à Bagdad au 4e/10e siècle: L'exemple de Nišwar de Tanūkī”, Nouvelle Revue des Études Iraniennes 1, 2008, 45–66.Google Scholar
BGA = Bibliotheca Geographicorum Arabicorum. 1967. ed. de Goeje, M.J.. 2nd revised ed., 7 vols. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Balʿamī, . 1389sh. Tārīkh-nāma-yi Ṭabarī (ed. Rawshan, Muḥammad). Third ed.Tehran: Surūsh, 5 vols.Google Scholar
Al-Balādhurī, . 1863–66. Futūḥ al-buldān (ed. Goeje, M.J. de). Leiden: Brill (trans. Hitti, Philipp Khuri (vol. 1) and Murgotten, Francis Clark (vol. 2), The Origins of the Islamic State. New York: Columbia University, 1916–24).Google Scholar
Balland, Daniel. 1991. “Tents, yurts, huts and caves: on the cultural geography of temporary dwellings in Afghanistan”, Folk 33, 1991, 107–15.Google Scholar
Bosworth, Clifford Edmund. 1968. Sīstān under the Arabs, from the Islamic Conquest to the Rise of the Ṣaffārids (30–250/651–864). Rome: IsMEO.Google Scholar
Bosworth, Clifford Edmund. 1970. “The Turks in the Islamic lands up to the mid-11th century”, in Cl. Cahen (ed.), Philologiae Turcicae Fundamenta, 3 vols, 3: 1–20, reprinted in Bosworth 2007: 193–228.Google Scholar
Bosworth, Clifford Edmund (ed.). 2007. The Turks in the Early Islamic world. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Bromberger, Christian. 1979. “Technologie et analyse sémantique des objets: pour une sémio-technologie”, L'Homme 19/1, 1979, 105–40.Google Scholar
Burhān-i qāṭiʿ. 1362sh. (ed. Muʿīn, M.), 4 vols. Tehran: Amīr Kabīr.Google Scholar
Clauson, Sir Gerard. 1972. An Etymological Dictionary of Pre-thirteenth Century Turkish. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Diez, Ernst. 1950. “Das Erbe der Steppe in der Turko-Iranischen Baukunst”, in Zeki Velidi Toğan'a Armağan. Istanbul, 331–8Google Scholar
Dihkhudā, ʿA.A. 1958–75. Lughāt-nāma (ed. Muʿīn, M.). Tehran, 1337–52sh.Google Scholar
al-Dīnawarī, Abū Ḥanīfa. 1960. K. al-Akhbār al-ṭiwāl (ed. ʿĀmir, ʿAbd al-Munʿim and al-Shayyāl, Jamāl al-Dīn). Cairo.Google Scholar
Doerfer, Gerhard. 1963–75. Türkische und Mongolische Elemente im Neupersischen. 4 vols. Wiesbaden: Franz Steiner Verlag.Google Scholar
Dozy, Reinhart. 1881. Supplément aux dictionnaires arabes. 2 vols. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Durand-Guédy, David. 2013. “The tents of the Saljuqs”, in Durand-Guédy, D. (ed.), Turko-Mongol Rulers, Cities and City Life. (Brill's Inner Asian Library.) Leiden and Boston: Brill, 149–89.Google Scholar
Durand-Guédy, David. Forthcoming a. “Khargāh and other terms of tentage in Ferdowsi's Shāh-nāmeh”.Google Scholar
Durand-Guédy, David. Forthcoming b. “Note on the use of the trellis tent (yurt) in pre-Chinggisid Central Asia: the Sogdian word xry'xh and its relation with Pers. khargāh and Turk. kerekü”.Google Scholar
Esin, Emel. 1967. “Al-qubbah al-turkiyyah”, in Atti del terzo Congresso di studi arabi e islamici. Naples: Istituto Universitario Orientale, 281–313.Google Scholar
Esin, Emel. 1971. “Türk kubbesi. Gök-Türklerden Selçuklara kadar”, Selçuklu Araştırmaları Dergisi 3, 159–78.Google Scholar
Esin, Emel. 1980. A History of pre-Islamic and Early Islamic Turkish Culture. Istanbul: Hakki Dursun Yıldız.Google Scholar
Firdawsī, . 1386–89sh. Shāh-nāma (ed. and commentary Jalāl Khāliqī-Muṭlaq). 8 vols. Tehran: Markaz-i Dāyirat al-maʿārif-i buzurg-i islāmī.Google Scholar
Frye, Richard N. 1975. “The Sāmānids”, in Frye, R. (ed.), Cambridge History of Iran, vol. 4, The Period from the Arab Invasion to the Saljuqs. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 136–61.Google Scholar
Gardīzī, . 1364sh. Zayn al-akhbār (ed. Ḥabībī, ʿAbd al-Ḥayy), Tārīkh-i Gardīzī, 2nd ed. [with a new pagination]. Tehran: Dunyā-yi kitāb.Google Scholar
Gharib, Badrazzaman [Qarīb, Badr al-Zamān]. 1995. Sogdian Persian Dictionary: Sogdian–Persian–English. Tehran: Farhangan Publications.Google Scholar
Hilāl al-Ṣābiʾ/Rūdrāwarī: see Miskawayh.Google Scholar
Hillenbrand, Robert. 1994. Islamic Architecture. Form, Function and Meaning. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Ḥudūd al-ʿālam (ed. Sutūda, Manūchihr). 1340sh/1962. Tehran: Intishārāt-i dānishgāh-i Tihrān.Google Scholar
al-Hamadhānī, Ibn al-Faqīh. 1979. K. Akhbār al-buldān (ed. with Russian trans. Jamgotchian, A.S.), K. Akhbār al-buldān, Izvestia o Stranakh. Erevan. Reprint Beirut 1416ah.Google Scholar
al-Hamadhānī, Ibn al-Faqīh. 1967. Abridgment of the K. Akhbār al-buldān, ed. in BGA: 5. Trans. Massé, H., Abrégé du Livre des Pays, ed. Pellat, Charles. Damascus: IFEAD, 1973.Google Scholar
Baṭṭūṭā, Ibn. 1853–58. Tuḥfat al-nuẓẓār fī gharāʾib al-amṣār (ed. and trans. Defrémery, C. and Sanguinetti, B.R.), 4 vols. Paris: Imprimerie impériale. Trans. H.A.R. Gibb completed by C.F. Beckingham, The Travels of Ibn Baṭṭūṭā, 5 vols. Cambridge: Hakluyt Society.Google Scholar
Faḍlān, Ibn. 1939. Risāla (ed. Togan, A.Z. Valıdi), “Ibn Faḍlān's Reisebericht”, Abhandlungen für die Kunde des Morgenlandes 24.Google Scholar
Ḥawqal, Ibn. 1967. K. Ṣūrat al-ʿarḍ (ed. in BGA 2, second ed. revised by Kramers, J.H.); trans. Kramers, J.H. and Wiet, G., Configuration de la terre, 2 vols. Paris and Beirut: Maisonneuve et Larose.Google Scholar
Al-Idrīsī, . 1989. Kitāb nuzhat al-mushtāq (ed. Cerulli et al.). reprint Beirut: ʿĀlam al-kutub.Google Scholar
Inaba, Minoru. 2006. “The identity of the Turkish rulers to the south of Hindukush from the 7th to the 9th Centuries AD”, ZINBUN 38, 1–19.Google Scholar
Al-Iṣṭakhrī, . K. al-Masālik wa l-mamālik, ed. in BGA, 1.Google Scholar
Jarbādhaqānī, . 2537sh. Tarjuma-yi Tārīkh-i Yamīnī (ed. Shuʿār, J.), second ed.Tehran: Bungāh-i tarjuma wa nashr-i kitāb.Google Scholar
Kāshgharī, . 1982–85. Dīwān lughāt al-turk (ed. and trans. Dankoff, Robert in collaboration with James Kelly), Compendium of the Turkic Dialects, 3 vols. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Kramers, J.H. 1932. “La question Balḫī-Istaḫrī-Ibn Ḥauqal et l'Atlas de I'Islam”, Acta Orientalia 10, 9–30.Google Scholar
Al-Māfarrūkhī, Mufaḍḍal. 1933. Kitāb Maḥāsin Iṣfahān (ed. Ṭihrānī, J.). Tehran: Maṭbaʿa majlis.Google Scholar
Manūchihrī, . 1886. Dīwān (ed. and trans. de Biberstein Kazimirsky, A.). Menoutchehri. Poète persan du 11ième siècle de notre ère (du 5ième de l'hégire). Paris: Klincksieck.Google Scholar
Marquart, Josef. 1903. Osteuropäische und Ostasiatische Streifzüge: Das Itinerar des Abû Dulaf Mis'ar nach der chinesischen Hauptstadt. Leipzig: Dieterich'sche Verlagsbuchhandlung Theodor Weicher.Google Scholar
Al-Marzūqī, . 1914. K. al-Azmina wa l-amkina (ed. Haydarabad, reprint. Beirut: Dār al-kitāb al-ʿilmiyya, 1417ah).Google Scholar
Minorsky, Vladimir. 1940. “The Turkish dialect of the Khalaj”, BSOAS 10/2, 417–37.Google Scholar
Minorsky, Vladimir. 1970. Ḥudūd al-ʿĀlam, “The Regions of the World”: A Persian Geography, 372 A.H.–982 A.D. (second edition by Bosworth, C.E.London: Luzac & Co).Google Scholar
Miquel, André. 1967. La géographie humaine du monde musulman (jusqu'au milieu du 11e siècle). Paris and The Hague: Mouton/Editions de l'EHESS.Google Scholar
Miskawayh and [his continuator] Hilāl al-Ṣābiʾ. 1380sh. Ed. Imāmī, Abū l-Qāsim, Tajārib al-umam, 8 vols. Tehran: Surūsh.Google Scholar
Miskawayh and [his continuator] Hilāl al-Ṣābiʾ. 1920–21. Ed. and trans. Amedroz, H.F. and Margoliouth, D.S., The Eclipse of the ʿAbbasid Caliphate, 6 vols. Oxford and London: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Mujmal al-tawārīkh wa l-qiṣaṣ. (Ed. Najmabadi, Seyfeddin and Weber, Siegfried) 2000. Mudjmal at-tawārīkh wa l-qiṣaṣ. Eine persische Weltgeschichte aus dem 12. Jahrhundert. Edingen and Neckarhausen: Deux Mondes.Google Scholar
Al-Muqaddasī/Maqdisī, . 1963. K. Aḥsan al-taqāsim fī maʾrifat al-aqālim, ed. in BGA 5. Partial trans. Miquel, A., La meilleure répartition pour la connaissance des provinces. Damascus: IFEAD.Google Scholar
Al-Narshakhī/Qubāwī, . Tārīkh-i Bukhārā (ed. Raḍawī, M.-T. Mudarris), 2nd. ed.Tehran: Tūs, 1362sh. Trans. Frye, Richard, The History of Bukhara, Cambridge, MA, 1954.Google Scholar
Nikitin, Alexandre B. 1984. “Monnaies d'Arachosie du haut moyen-âge”, Studia Iranica 13, 233–39.Google Scholar
Northedge, Alastair. 2005. The Historical Topography of Samarra. London: British School of Archaeology in Iraq.Google Scholar
Paul, Jürgen. 1994. The State and the Military: The Samanid Case. Bloomington: Indiana University, Research Institute for Inner Asian Studies.Google Scholar
Qazwīnī, Muḥammad M. 1959. (Ed. Afshār, Īraj.) Yāddāsht-hā-yi Qazwīnī, vol. 4. Tehran: Intishārāt-i Dānishgāh-i Tihrān.Google Scholar
Faḍl-Allāh, Rashīd al-Dīn. 1960. (ed. Ateş, A.), Cāmi’ al-tavārīh (Metin), II. Cild, 5. Cüz, Selçuklular tarihi. Ankara: Türk Tarih Kurumu Basımevi. (Trans. Luther, Kenneth Allun, ed. Bosworth, C.E., The History of the Seljuq Turks, from the Jāmiʿ al-Tawārīkh (An Ilkhanid Adaptation of the Saljūq-nāma of Ẓahīr al-Dīn Nīshāpūrī). Richmond: Curzon Press, 2001.)Google Scholar
Rūdakī, . 1388sh. Dīwān. ed. Bereginsky, B., Samailovich, Y. and Nafīsī, S.. Tehran: Intishārāt-i Nigāh, 5th reprint.Google Scholar
Rāzī, Shams-i Qays. 1387sh. Al-muʿjam fī maʿāyīr ashʿār al-ʿajam, ed. Raḍawī, M.-T. Mudarris. Tehran.Google Scholar
Spuler, Bertold. 1971. “Le rôle des Turcs dans l'histoire de l'Iran (XIe–XIIIe siècle)”, La Persa nel medioevo. Atti del convegno internazionale, Roma 1970. Rome: Accademia Nazionale dei Lincei, 585–96.Google Scholar
Stark, Sören. 2008. Die Alttürkenzeit in Mittel- und Zentralasien. Archäologische und historische Studien. Wiesbaden: Reichert.Google Scholar
Steingass, Francis J. 1975. Persian–English Dictionary. 1st ed. 1892, reprint Beirut: Librairie du Liban.Google Scholar
Stronach, David. 2004. “On the antiquity of the yurt: evidence from Arjan and elsewhere”, Silk Road 2/1, http://www.silkroadfoundation.org/newsletter/2004vol2num1/yurt.htm (last consulted 18/07/2014).Google Scholar
Swietochowski, Marie and Carboni, Stefano (eds). 1994. Illustrated Poetry and Epic Images: Persian Paintings of the 1330s and 1340s. New York: Metropolitan Museum of Art.Google Scholar
al-Ṭabarī, . (ed. Goeje, M.J. de). 1879–1901. Taʾrīkh al-rusul wa l-mulūk, Annales, 15 vols. Leiden: Brill. Translation edited under the direction of E. Yarshater, The History of al-Ṭabarī, 40 vols. New York: State University of New York Press, 1985–2007.Google Scholar
al-Tawḥīdī, Abū Ḥayyān (ed. al-Ṭunjī, M.). 1992. Akhlāq al-wazīrayn. Beirut: Dār Ṣādir. Trans. Frédéric Lagrange, La Satire des deux vizirs. Paris: Actes Sud, 2004.Google Scholar
al-ʿUtbī, . (ed. al-Thāmirī, Iḥsān Dhunūn). 2004. K. al-Yamīnī. Beirut: Dār al-Ṭalīʿa.Google Scholar
al-Yaʿqūbī, . K. al-Buldān, ed. in BGA 7.Google Scholar
de la Vaissière, Etienne. 2004. Histoire des marchands sogdiens, second ed.Paris: de Boccard.Google Scholar
de la Vaissière, Etienne. 2007. Samarcande et Samarra. Élites d'Asie centrale dans l'Empire abbasside. Paris: Association pour l'avancement des études iraniennes.Google Scholar
Wensinck, Arent Jan. 1933–88. Concordance et indices de la tradition musulmane, 8 vols. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar