Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T08:47:16.942Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Invented origins: Muromachi interpretations of okina sarugaku

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 February 2009

Noel J. Pinnington
Affiliation:
Japan Research Centre, University of Cambridge

Extract

Okina , a ritual play without plot, a collection of old songs and dialogues interspersed with dances, can be seen in many parts of Japan, performed in various versions. In village festivals, it may be put on by local people using libretti derived from oral traditions, and in larger shrines professional players might be employed to perform it at the New Year. Puppets enact Okina dances at the start of Bunraku performances and Kabuki actors use them to open their season. Such Okina performances derive from Nō traditions, and as might be expected, the Nō schools have their own Okina, based on texts deriving from the Edo period, which they perform at the start of celebratory programmes. These ‘official’ versions feature, among other roles, two old men: Okina and Sanbasō (). Before the fifteenth century, when Nō traditions were being established, it was common for a third old man known as Chichi no jō () to appear as well (I shall refer to this ‘complete’ form as Shikisanban, three ritual pieces, a term used by Muromachi performers). These old men are marked out from all other Nō roles by their use of a unique type of mask, having a separated lower jaw connected by a cord (the so-called kiriago).Erika de Poorter, in her introduction to Okina, suggests that actors dropped the third section because its Buddhist content conflicted with a trend away from Buddhism towards Shinto (a trend she refers to as ‘the spirit of the times’). She supports her theory by adducing a similar ideological shift in contemporaneous interpretations of Okina and legends about the origins of Nō. De Poorter tells us little about these interpretations, as is perhaps appropriate for an introductory essay. This study, however, aims to give a full account of them, starting with a Buddhist reading, recorded near the beginning of the Muromachi period, proceeding to interpretations current among performers in the fifteenth century, and concluding with the purely Shinto explanation taught by the Yoshida lineage in the mid-sixteenth century.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © School of Oriental and African Studies, University of London 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Amano, Fumio 1990. ‘Okina sarugaku no hensen’, Geinōshi Kenkyū, 109: 1428.Google Scholar
Fumio, Amano. 1992. ‘Yoshidake ni yoru okina no daiji denju no jittai: Tend toshokan Yoshida bunko shiryō o chūshin ni’, Geinōshi Kenkyū, 116: 124.Google Scholar
Chamberlain, BasilHall (tr.). 1883. The Kojiki: Records of ancient matters. (Transactions of the Asiatic Society of Japan, 10, supplement.) Yokohama: Meiklejohn.Google Scholar
de Poorter, Erika. 1989. ‘Nō which is no Nō: the ritual play “Okina”’, Maske und Kothurn, 35: 2130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geinōshi, Kenkyūkai(ed.). 1974. Dengaku, sarugaku. (Nihon shomin bunka shiryō shūsei, 2) Tokyo:San'ichi Shobō.Google Scholar
GrapardA, llan G. 1992. ‘ The Shintō of Yoshida Kanetomo’, Monumenta Nipponica, 47/1: 2758.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hattori, Yukio. 1973. 'Ushirodo no kami-geinōshin shinkō ni kansuru ichi kōsatsu’, Bungaku, 41/7: 73–83.Google Scholar
Inoura, Yoshinobu and Toshio, Kawatake. 1981. The traditional theater of Japan. Tokyo: Japan Foundation.Google Scholar
Itō, Masayoshi. 1970. Komparu Zenchiku no kenkyū. Kyoto: Akao Shōbundō.Google Scholar
Katō, Genchi and Hikoshiro, Hoshino (tr.). 1925. Kogoshūi: gleanings from ancient stories. Tokyo: Meiji Japan Society.Google Scholar
Konishi, Jin'ichi. 1991. A history of Japanese literature. Vol 3: The high middle ages. Tr. Aileen Gatten and Mark Harbison; ed. Miner, Earl. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kosai, Tsutomu 1962. Zeami shinkō. Tokyo: Wanya Shoten.Google Scholar
Kosai, Tsutomu. 1970. Zoku Zeami shinkō. Tokyo: Wanya Shoten.Google Scholar
Looser, Thomas. 1995. ‘Locating Tokugawa power: the place of the Nō in early modern Japan’, in Tetsuo, Najita (ed.), Productions of culture in Japan. (Select papers of the Center for East Asian Studies, 10.) Chicago: University of Chicago, 1995, 145–95.Google Scholar
Misaki, Gisen. 1988. ‘Hokegobukukanjo to okina sarugaku ni tsuite’, Tendai gakuhō, 30: 2430.Google Scholar
Morisue, Yoshiaki 1971. Chūsei geinōshi ronkō: sarugaku no nō no hatten to chūsei shakai. Tokyo: Tōkyōdō Shuppan, 302–11.Google Scholar
Murayama, Shūichi. 1974. Honji suijaku. (Nihon rekishi sōsho, 33.) Tokyo: Yoshikawa Kōbunkan.Google Scholar
Nagashima, Fukutaro. 1959. ‘Kōfukuji no rekishi’, Bukkyō Geijutsu, 40: 122.Google Scholar
Nakamura, Yasuo. 1990. ‘Okina men kenkyū o megutte’, Geinōshi Kenkyū, 109: 2942.Google Scholar
Nogami, Toyoichirō 1930. Nō, kenkyũ to hakken. Tokyo: Iwanami Shoten.Google Scholar
Nonomura, Kaizō. and Andō Tsunejirō(ed.). 1931. Kyōgen shūsei. Tokyo: Shun'yōdō.Google Scholar
Nose, Asaji 1938. Nōgaku genryūkō. Tokyo: Iwanami Shoten.Google Scholar
O'Neill, P. G. 1959. ‘The special Kasuga Wakamiya festival of 1349’, Monumenta Nipponica, 14/3: 162–82.Google Scholar
Hiroshi, Ochiai (ed.) . 1990. ‘Hokegobukukanjo’, Geinōshi Kenkyū, 109: 6176.Google Scholar
Oda, Sachiko. 1990. ‘Sanbasō no mondō no hensen’, Geinō, 32/1: 1218.Google Scholar
Omote, Akiraand Masayoshi, Itō(ed.). 1969. Konparu kodensho shūsei. Tokyo: Wanya Shoten.Google Scholar
Omote, Akiraand Fumio, Amano(ed.). 1987. Nōgaku no rekishi. (Iwanami k:za: Nō Kyōgen, 1.) Tokyo: Iwanami Shoten.Google Scholar
Omote, Akiraand Shūichi, Katō(ed.). 1974. Zeami, Zenchiku (Nihon shisō taikei, 24.) Tokyo: Iwanami Shoten.Google Scholar
Omote, Akira. 1974. ‘Tōnomine no sarugaku’, Nōgaku Kenkyū, 1: 88120.Google Scholar
Omote, Akira 1978. ‘Yamato sarugaku no osa no seikaku no hensen (ge)’, Nōgaku Kenkyū, 4: 192.Google Scholar
Omote, Akira. 1979. Nōgakushi Shinkō 1. Tokyo: Wanya Shoten.Google Scholar
Osone, Shosukeand Hideaki, Horiuchi(ed). 1983. Wakanrōeishū. (Shinchō Nihon koten shūsei, 61.) Tokyo: Shinchōsha.Google Scholar
Osumi, Kazuo(ed.). 1977. Chūsei shintōron. (Nihon shisō taikei, 19) Tokyo: Iwanami Shoten.Google Scholar
Pinnington, Noel J. 1997.‘Crossed Paths: Zeami's transmission to Zenchiku’, Monumenla Nipponica, 52/2: 201–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pinnington, Noel J. 1994. ‘Strategies of legitimation: an approach to the expository writings of Komparu Zenchiku’. Ph.D. thesis, University of Cambridge.Google Scholar
Sanari, Kentarō. 1930. Yōkyoku taikan 1. Tokyo: Meiji Shoin. [‘Okina’, 113].Google Scholar
Tanaka, Makoto. 1939. ‘Okina no daiji ni tsuite’, Yōkyokukai, 14: 7: 914.Google Scholar
Taya, Raishunetal. (ed). 1955. Bukkyōgaku jiten. Kyoto: Hōzōkan.Google Scholar
Thornhill, Arthur H., III. 1993. Six circles, one dewdrop: the religio-aesthetic world of Komparu Zenchiku. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Yamaji, Kōzō. 1990. ‘Okina sarugaku seiritsuki no kenkyū o megutte’, Geinōshi Kenkyū, 109: 113.Google Scholar