Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T13:51:48.809Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Hanoi dorsal finals

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 December 2009

Extract

Hanoi Vietnamese, although not apparently genetically related to Chinese, is a language phonologically of the Chinese type; in the terminology of Hockett (1955, 60–1, 129), Hanoi Vietnamese phonology constitutes a system without interludes, with syllable juncture, and with tones as ICs of syllables. Hanoi phonology is in fact rather close to the phonology of Middle Chinese (Karlgren's ‘Ancient Chinese’, cf. Pulleyblank, 1962, 64), the source, via the dialect of Chinese called ‘Sino-Vietnamese’ (Haudricourt, 1954, 79), of the majority of Vietnamese lexical items.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © School of Oriental and African Studies 1969

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Chomsky, Noam: Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press, 1965.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. and Halle, M.: The sound pattern of English. New York: Harper and Row, 1968.Google Scholar
Day, A. C., ‘Final consonants in Northern Vietnamese’, Viet-nam Khao-co Tap-san: Transactions of the Historial Research Institute (saigon), III, 1962, 89109.Google Scholar
Emeneau, M. B.: Studies in Vietnamese (Annamese) grammar. (University of California Publications in Linguistics, VII.), Berkeley and Los Angles: University of California Press, 1951.Google Scholar
Halle, Morris: The sound pattern of Russian. 's Gravenhage: mouton, 1959.Google Scholar
Halle, Morris, ‘Phonology in generative grammar’, Word, XVIII, 1–2, 1962, 5772. (Reprinted in J. A. Fodor and J. J. Katz: The Structure of language. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall, 1964.)Google Scholar
Han, M.S.: Studies in the phonology of Asian languages IV: Vietnamese vowels. Los Angles: Acoustic Phonetics Research Laboratory, University of Southern California, 1966. (Mimeographed.)Google Scholar
Han, M. S.: Studies in the phonology of Asian languages VI: complex syllable nuclei in Vietnamese, Los Angeles: Acoustic Phonetics Research Laboratory, University of Southern California, 1968. (Mimeographed.)Google Scholar
Haudricourt, A.-G, ‘De I'origine des tons en vieêtnamien’, Journal Asiatique, CCXLII, 1, 1954, 6982.Google Scholar
Henderson, E. J. A.,‘The articular of final “-nh” and “-ch” in Vietnamese’, Proceedings of the fifth International congress of Phonetic Sciences, 1964, 1965, 348–52.Google Scholar
Henderson, E. J. A., ‘Towards a prosodic statement of Vietnames syllable structure’, in Bazell, C. E. and others (ed.): In memory of J. R. Firth. (Longmans' Linguistics Library.) London: Longmans, Green and Co. Ltd., 1966, 163.–97.Google Scholar
Hockett, C. F., ‘peiping phonology’, JAOS, LXVII, 4, 1947, 253–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hockett, C. F., ‘A manual of phonology’, IJAL, XXI, 4, Pt. I, 1955. (IJAL Memoir II.)Google Scholar
Hockett, C. F., Language, mathematics, and linguistics. (Janua Linguarum. Series Minor, 60.) 's- Gravenhage: Mouton, 1967.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lamb, S. M., ‘Prolegomena to a theory of phonology’, Language, XLII, 2, 1966, 5373.Google Scholar
Hùng, Lê văn: Vietnamese-English dictionary. Paris: Ėditions Europe-Asie, 1955.Google Scholar
Ly, Lê vąn: Le parler viêtnamien. (Second ed., revised.) Saigon: Ministry of Education, 1960.Google Scholar
Pulleyblank, E. G., ‘The consonantal system of Old Chinese’, Asia Major, NS, IX, 1, 1962, 58144; IX, 2, 1963, 206–65.Google Scholar
Thompson, L. C.: A vietnamese grammar. Seattle: University of Washington Press, 1965.Google Scholar
Thompson, L. C.: ‘The history of vietnamese final palatals’, Language, XLIII, 1, 1967, 362–71.Google Scholar
Wang, W. S. Y., ‘Phonological features of tone’, IJAL, XXXIII, No. 2, Pt. i. 1967, 93105.Google Scholar
Zimmer, K.E., ‘A note on vowel harmony’, IJAL, XXXIII, 2, Pt. i, 1967, 166–71.Google Scholar