Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T15:59:49.764Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Consonant dissimilarity in Biblical Hebrew defective nouns

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 May 2020

Emmanuel Aïm
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Co-occurrence restrictions on Biblical Hebrew root consonants have received thorough treatment in the specialized literature. However, combinations involving glides on the one hand, and nominal roots on the other, have received very little attention. The aim of this paper is to argue for an incompatibility between medial consonants and final glides in defective nouns: a final w cannot generally follow a homorganic medial root consonant, viz. labial p, b, m and velar k, g, q. The III-w roots are rare: they came about as a result of a well-documented historical process and are found almost only in nominal roots. Previous investigations have overlooked this incompatibility owing to the incomplete scope of the studies.

Keywords

Biblical HebrewPhonologyMorphologyRoot incompatibilitiesDissimilationDefective nounsGlides
Type
Article
Information
Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies , Volume 83 , Issue 2 , June 2020 , pp. 225 - 237
Copyright
Copyright © SOAS University of London, 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

I am grateful to the anonymous reviewers for BSOAS for important comments and suggestions.

References

Aešcoly, Aaron Z. 1937–40. “Incompatibilités de phonèmes en hébreu et en araméen”, Comptes Rendus du Groupe linguistique d’Études chamito-sémitiques 3, 54–6.Google Scholar
Aïm, Emmanuel. 2015. “Le changement w > y en hébreu biblique”, AIΩN Linguistica n.s. 4, 11–35.Google Scholar
Aïm, Emmanuel. 2019. “An unexpected co-occurrence restriction on Syriac root consonants”, Hugoye: Journal of Syriac Studies 22/1, 139–61.Google Scholar
Bachra, Bernard N. 2001. The Phonological Structure of the Verbal Roots in Arabic and Hebrew. (Studies in Semitic Languages and Linguistics 34.) Leiden: Brill.10.1163/9789004348523CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Banksira, Degif P. 2000. Sound Mutations: The Morphophonology of Chaha. Amsterdam: Benjamins.10.1075/z.93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barth, Jakob. 1887. “Vergleichende Studien”, Zeitschrift der Deutschen Morgenländischen Gesellschaft 41/4, 603–41.Google Scholar
Barth, Jakob. 1893. Etymologische Studien zum semitischen, insbesondere zum hebraischen Lexicon. Leipzig: Hinrichs.Google Scholar
Black, Jeremy, George, Andrew and Postgate, Nicholas. 2000. A Concise Dictionary of Akkadian. (Second corrected printing.) Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
Bohas, Georges. 1990. “A diachronic effect of the OCP”, Linguistic Inquiry 21/2, 298–301.Google Scholar
Brockelmann, Carl. 1899. Syrische Grammatik mit Paradigmen, Literatur, Chrestomathie und Glossar. Berlin: Reuther & Reichard.Google Scholar
Brown, Francis, Driver, Samuel R. and Briggs, Charles A.. 1906. A Hebrew and English Lexicon of the Old Testament with an Appendix Containing the Biblical Aramaic. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Cantineau, Jean. 1946. “Esquisse d'une phonologie de l'Arabe Classique”, Bulletin de la Société de Linguistique de Paris 126, 93–140.Google Scholar
Clements, George N. 1993. “Lieu d'articulation des consonnes et des voyelles”, in Laks, Bernard and Rialland, Annie (eds), Architecture des représentations phonologiques. Paris: CNRS, 101–45.Google Scholar
Dillmann, August. 1865. Lexicon linguae Aethiopicae. Lipsiae: Weigel.Google Scholar
Gesenius, Wilhelm. 1910. Gesenius’ Hebrew Grammar as Edited and Enlarged by E. Kautzsch and Revised by A.E. Cowley. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Gelb, Ignace J. et al. 1956–2010. The Assyrian Dictionary of the Oriental Institute of the University of Chicago (21 vols). Chicago: The Oriental Institute of the University of Chicago.Google Scholar
Goldenberg, Gideon. 2005. “Semitic triradicalism and the biradical question”, in Kahn, Geoffrey (ed.), Semitic Studies in Honour of Edward Ullendorff. Leiden: Brill, 9–25.Google Scholar
Greenberg, Joseph. 1950. “The patterning of root morphemes in Semitic”, Word 6, 162–81.10.1080/00437956.1950.11659378CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoberman, Robert. 1993. “Local spreading”, Journal of Afroasiatic Languages 3, 226–54.Google Scholar
Huehnergard, John. 2000. A Grammar of Akkadian. (Harvard Semitic Studies 25.) Winona Lake: Eisenbrauns.Google Scholar
Joüon, Paul. 1923. Grammaire de l'hébreu biblique. (Reprint 1996.) Rome: Institut Biblique Pontifical.Google Scholar
Kaye, Alan S. and Rosenhouse, Judith. 1997. “Arabic dialects and Maltese”, in Hetzron, Robert (ed.), The Semitic Languages. London: Routledge, 263–311.Google Scholar
Kazimirski, Albert de Biberstein. 1944. Dictionnaire arabe–français (2 vols, reprint). Beirut: Librairie du Liban.Google Scholar
Koehler, Ludwig, Baumgartner, Walter and Stamm, Johann. 2001. The Hebrew and Aramaic Lexicon of the Old Testament (translated by Richardson, M.). Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Koskinen, Kalevi. 1964. “Kompatibilität in den dreikonsonantigen hebräischen Wurzeln”, Zeitschrift der Deutschen Morgenländischen Gesellschaft 114/1, 16–58.Google Scholar
Kuryłowicz, Jerzy. 1972. Studies on Semitic Grammar and Metrics. Wroclaw: Zakład Narodowy Imienia Ossolińskich.Google Scholar
Lambert, Mayer. 1946. Traité de grammaire hébraïque. (2nd ed.). Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Leslau, Wolf. 1987. Comparative Dictionary of Geʿez (Classical Ethiopic): Geʿez–English/English–Geʿez with an Index of Semitic Roots. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
McCarthy, John. 1979. “Formal problems in Semitic phonology and morphology”, PhD Dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.Google Scholar
McCarthy, John. 1983. “Morphology in the Chaha verb”, in Barlow, Michael et al. (eds), Proceedings of the 2nd West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics. Stanford: Stanford University, 176–88.Google Scholar
McCarthy, John. 1989. “Guttural phonology”, Ms, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.Google Scholar
Morgenbrod, Horst and Serifi, Elvira. 1981. “The sound structure of verb roots in modern Hebrew”, Journal of Linguistics 17/1, 11–16.10.1017/S0022226700006733CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moscati, Sabatino et al. 1964. An Introduction to the Comparative Grammar of the Semitic Languages. Phonology and Morphology. (Porta Linguarum Orientalium 6.) Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
Muchiki, Yoshiyuki. 1999. Egyptian Proper Names and Loanwords in Northwest Semitic. (Society of Biblical Literature Dissertation Series 173.) Atlanta: Scholars Press.Google Scholar
Noonan, Benjamin. 2012. “Foreign loanwords and Kulturwörter in Northwest Semitic (1400–600 B.C.E.): Linguistic and cultural contact in light of terminology for realia”, PhD Dissertation, Hebrew Union College, Jewish Institute of Religion.Google Scholar
Olmo Lete, Gregorio del. 2008. Questions of Semitic Linguistics: Root and Lexeme. The History of Research. Bethesda: CDL Press.Google Scholar
Prince, Alan. 1975. “The phonology and morphology of Tiberian Hebrew”, PhD Dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.Google Scholar
Tobin, Yishai. 1990. “A combinatory phonology of the Hebrew triconsonantal (CCC) root system”, La Linguistique 26, 99–114.Google Scholar
Vernet, Eulàlia. 2011. “Semitic root incompatibilities and historical linguistics”, Journal of Semitic Studies 56/1, 1–18.10.1093/jss/fgq056CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Voigt, Rainer-Maria. 1988. Die Infirmen Verbaltypen des Arabischen und das Biradikalismus Problem. Stuttgart: Steiner.Google Scholar
Weitzman, Michael. 1987. “Statistical patterns in Hebrew and Arabic roots”, Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society 1, 15–22.Google Scholar
Wilson-Wright, Aren. 2015. “From Persepolis to Jerusalem: A reevaluation of Old Persian–Hebrew contact in the Achaemenid period”, Vetus Testamentus 65, 152–67.10.1163/15685330-12301191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson-Wright, Aren. 2016. “Father, brother, and father-in-law as III-w nouns in Semitic”, Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies 79/1, 23–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, William. 1890. Lectures on the Comparative Grammar of the Semitic Languages. (Reprint 1966.) Amsterdam: Philo Press.Google Scholar
Zaborski, Andrzej. 1991. “Biconsonantal roots and triconsonantal root variation in Semitic: solutions and prospect”, in Kaye, Alan S. (ed.), Semitic Studies in Honor of Wolf Leslau on the Occasion of his 85th Birthday. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz, 1675–1703.Google Scholar