Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T18:09:57.075Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Bahing and the Proto-Kiranti verb1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 February 2009

George Van Driem
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Data on the Bahing verbal agreement system were collected in the first half of the nineteenth century and in the second half of the twentieth century. The current periphrastic model of the Proto-Kiranti verb is evaluated in the light of a morphemic analysis of the Bahing conjugation. This re-assessment leads to a refinement of the model of the Proto-Kiranti verb

Type
Articles
Information
Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies , Volume 54 , Issue 2 , June 1991 , pp. 336 - 356
Copyright
Copyright © School of Oriental and African Studies, University of London 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Driem, George van. 1987. A grammar of Limbu, Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Driem, George van. 1990(a). ‘An exploration of Proto-Kiranti verbal morphology’, Acta Linguistica Hafniensia 22: 27–48.Google Scholar
Driem, George van. 1990(6). Review of Boyd Michailovsky, La langue hayu, BSOAS, LIII, 2: 565–71.Google Scholar
Driem, George van. 1991(a). A grammar of Dumi, Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Driem, George van. 1991(6). (forthcoming). ‘Le proto-kiranti revisité, morphologie verbale du lohorung’, Ada Linguistica Hafniensa.Google Scholar
Driem, George van. 1991(c). ‘Tangut verbal agreement and the patient category in Tibeto-Burman’, BSOAS LIV, 3 (in press).Google Scholar
Driem, George van. (forthcoming (a).) ‘The Proto-Tibeto-Burman verbal agreement system’.Google Scholar
Driem, George van. (forthcoming (b).) ‘Taal en identiteit: Indo-Arisch expansionisme in oostelijk Nepal’, Bijdragen lot de Taal-, Land- en Volkenkunde.Google Scholar
Hodgson, Brian Houghton. 1857. ‘Comparative vocabulary of the languages of the broken Tribes of Népál’, Journal of the Asiatic Society of Bengal, XXVI, 317–522.Google Scholar
Hodgson, Brian Houghton. 1858. ‘Comparative vocabulary of the languages of the broken Tribes of Nepál’, Journal of the Asiatic Society of Bengal, XXVII, 393–456.Google Scholar
Hunter, Sir William Wilson. 1896. Life of Brian Houghton Hodgson, London: John Murray.Google Scholar
LaPolla, Randy J. 1989. ‘Verb agreement, head-marking vs. dependent-marking and the “deconstruction” of Tibeto-Burman Morpho-Syntax’, Proceedings of the fifteenth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, Berkeley: University of California.Google Scholar
Lehmann, Christian. 1985. ‘Grammaticalization: synchronic variation and diachronic change’, Lingua e Stile xx, 3: 303–18.Google Scholar
Michailovsky, Boyd. 1975. ‘Notes on the Kiranti verb (East Nepal)’, Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area, II, 2: 183–218.Google Scholar
Michailovsky, Boyd. 1988. La langue hayu, Paris: Éditions du Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique.Google Scholar