Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T05:37:10.713Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Spontaneous cerebrals in Sansktit

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 December 2009

T. Burrow
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The development of the cerebral or retroflex series (ṭ ṭh ḍ ḍh ṇ ḷ ṣ)in Old Indo-Aryan is a complicated phenomenon to which many factors have contributed, and a full and satisfactory account of it is yet to be produced. One of the factors involved is that of spontaneous cerebralization, by which original dentals become cerebrals without the presence of any predisposing influence. This phenomenon has always been recognized to some extent but its full extent and significance have only recently come to be recognized.

Type
Research Article
Information
Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies , Volume 34 , Issue 3 , October 1971 , pp. 538 - 559
Copyright
Copyright © School of Oriental and African Studies 1971

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Göttingen, 1896, 172–3.

2 cf. also Śāṇa- ‘whetstone’ (Wackernagel, , At. Or., Nachträge zu Bd. I, 107)Google Scholar.

3 cf. Geiger, , Pāli Lileratur und Sprache, 58 ffGoogle Scholar.; Pisohel, , Grammatik der Prākrit-Sprachen, 156 ffGoogle Scholar.

4 The principal references for Bailey's treatment of this subject are as follows: TPS, 1952, 61f. (nadá-/nadá-); TPS, 1955, 72 ff. (kuṇtha-), AWN, Sez. Ling., I, 2, 1959, 119Google Scholar (kilāta-), 139 (kinvá-); BSOAS, XXIII1, 1, 1960, 32–4Google Scholar (turia-) Khotanese texts, iv, 1961, 113Google Scholar (ninyá-); Adyar Library Bulletin, xxv, 1961, 6 ffGoogle Scholar. (píṇ ḍa-); BSOAS xxiv, 3, 1961, 480ffGoogle Scholar. (píṇ ḍḍa-, veṇi, paṇ ḍita-); BSOAS xxvi, 1, 1963, 72Google Scholar ff. (maṇ ḍa-, maṇ ḍapa-, etc.); Adyar Library Bulletin, XXXI–XXXII, 1967–8 [pub. 1968], 8–11 (garuḍa-; harmuta-, tarkuṭa-, avatá-);Khotanese texts vi, 1967, 214Google Scholar(phaṇ-).

5 BSOAS, xxiv, 3, 1961, 480Google Scholar.

6 BSOAS, xxvi, 1, 1963, 74Google Scholar.

7 The Sanskrit language London, 1955, 96Google Scholar and 129 (avaṭá-), 149 (harmuṭa-).

8 A Dravidian etymology (Tam. maṇṇu ‘wash, clean, adorn’) was proposed in BSOAS, XII, 2, 1948, 389Google Scholar, but not retained in DED. It is now clear that it should be abandoned.

9 Mélanges d'indianisme à la ménwire de Louis Renou, Paris, 1968, 509–17Google Scholar.

10 Not from pṇksti- (Pokorny, , IEW, 839)Google Scholar.

11 cf. The Sanskrit language, 21–2Google Scholar.

12 Proto-Munda words in Sanskrit Amsterdam, 1948, 48Google Scholar.

13 cf. further Archivum Linguisticum, IX, 2, 1957, 135Google Scholar.

14 Lewis, and Pedersen, , Concise comparative Celtic grammar Göttingen, 1937, 339Google Scholar.

15 See Wackernagel, , Ai. Gr., i, 171Google Scholar;Thumb-Hauschild, , Handbuch des Sanskrit, 3. Aufi., I, Heidelberg, 1958, 281Google Scholar.

16 A comparative grammar of the Hittite language, New Haven, 1951, 60Google Scholar.

17 Kuiper, F. B. J., op. cit., 163Google Scholar.

18 cf. BSOAS, XII, 2, 1948, 369–70Google Scholar; alsoKuiper, F. B. J., op. cit., 51Google Scholar. Neither of these was taken into DED.

19 Kuiper, F. B. J., op. cit., 50Google Scholar. Not taken into DED because the long -ā- of the Sanskrit is not explained, and the Dravidian words in the relevant entry (DED 974) show only -ṇ-, not -ṇḍ-. On the other hand Skt. gaṇḍda- was quoted in DED 1619.

20 cf. also Kuiper, F. B. J., Die indogermanischen Nasalpräsentia, Amsterdam, 1937, 129Google Scholar.

21 Khotanese texts, vi, 27–8Google Scholar.

22 Jackson, , JAOS XXXVIII, 2, 1918, 122Google Scholar; followed by Kuiper, F. B. J., Die indogermaniachen Nasalprāsentia 129Google Scholar.

23 Kurzgef. etym. Wb. des Ai., II, Heidelberg, 1963, 651Google Scholar.

24 See Palsule, G. B., A concordance of Sanskrit Dhātupāṭhas with index of meanings, Poona, 1955, 184Google Scholar.

25 BSOAS. XVII, 2, 1955, p. 343, n. 1Google Scholar.

26 of. Machek, , KZ, LXIV, 3–4, 1937, 265 f.Google Scholar, and Vasmer, , Russisches etym. Wb., Heidelberg, 1950–1958, I, 301Google Scholar.

27 TPS, 1955, 71.

28 It cannot be derived from kaṭu-phala (MW), but kaṭu- could have influenced the form.

29 TPS, 1945, 93.

30 Skt.viṭapa- ' branch ' seems to be a similar case with the prefix vi (as Uhlenbeck noted, s. v.), hence <*vi-tapa-; unfortunately a root tap- with a suitable meaning seems not to be available.

31 The alternative form sthaḍu- ‘hump’, if not simply a misreading, will have arisen from a contamination of sthagu- and gaḍu.

32 cf. Gershevitch, I., The Avestan hymn to Mithra, p. 180, nGoogle Scholar.

33 Khotanese texts, VI, 27Google Scholar.

34 Krause, W. and Thomas, W., Tocharisches Elementarbuch, I, Heidelberg, 1960, 57Google Scholar.

35 Gundert, , ZDMG, XXIII, 1869, 521Google Scholar; Hultzsch, , JRAS, 1914, 1, p. 96Google Scholar; Burrow, , TPS, 1946, 22Google Scholar.

36 Kuiper, F. B. J., Proto-Munda words in Sanskrit, 52Google Scholar.

37 AHM, 81.

38 With reference to this root (and to val- which is also popular with the kāvyā writers)Rucipati, , in his commentary on Anarqharāghava, II, 79Google Scholar, remarks kalivalī kāmadhenū iti vaiyā karanāh.

39 See BSOAS, XXIII, 1, 1960, 30Google Scholar.

40 cf. Burrow, , ‘Sanskrit jálāṣa--’, in Boyce, M. and Gershevitch, I. (ed.), W. B. Henning memorial volume, London, 1970, 89–97Google Scholar.

41 cf. Burrow, , ‘Sanskrit śáspa- and bāspa- JRAS 1969, 2, pp. 112–17Google Scholar.

42 Since -b- does not occur as a suffixal element, it must represent earlier -ν-; analyse *kil-v-iṣa-.

43 This kas- is perhaps also to be seen in kacchū ‘itch’, containing this root followed by the suffix -sk (cf.icchu-). Since the group -cch- is a specific Indo-Aryan development, it is hardly advisable to seek a non-Aryan origin.