Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T14:37:12.992Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Modern Egyptian renaissance man

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 February 2009

Robin Ostle
Affiliation:
The Oriental Institute, Oxford

Extract

The rise of political consciousness in the Arab Provinces of the Ottoman Empire in the nineteenth century has long been referred to as an era of rebirth or resurrection (nahḍa), and from its earliest stages this period saw a dual process of aspirations to political emancipation and creative waves of cultural regeneration. Thus George Antonius was moved to attribute the beginnings of the Arab national movement to the foundation of a modest literary society in Beirut in 1847; the two figures who dominated the intellectual life of Syria in the mid nineteenth century—Nāṣīf al-Yāzijī and Buṭrus al-Bustānī—were ded icated to the resurrection of the lost world of classical Arabic literature, to the virtual re-creation of Arabic as one of the languages of the modern world, and to preaching the virtues of education based on inter-confessional tolerance and patriotic ideals. The most distinguished area of the early history of modern Arabic literature is neo-classical poetry, whose revival of the achievements of the golden age of the ‘Abbāsids provided the foundation on which the first tentative steps towards the renewal of the great tradition were to be based. Indeed the technical excellence of the neo-classical mode was such that it dominated poetry in Egypt at least until the late 1920s, and for even longer in Iraq and the rest of the Levant.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © School of Oriental and African Studies, University of London 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Antonius, George: The Arab awakening (Beirut, n.d.), 13Google Scholar.

2 See ‘The Neo-classical Arabic poets’ by Somekh, S. in M.M., Badawi (ed.), The Cambridge history of Arabic literature: modern Arabic literature (Cambridge, 1992) 36ffGoogle Scholar.

3 See the modern volume of The Cambridge history of Arabic literature for the most complete and up to date version of this history.

4 Yapp, Malcolm: ‘Modernization and literature in the Near and Middle East 1850–1914’, in Robin, Ostle (ed.), Modern literature in the Near and Middle East 1850–1970 (London, 1991), 1314Google Scholar.

5 Abū Ghāzī, Badr al-Dīn, Jīl min al-ruwwād (Cairo, 1975), 17Google Scholar.

6 Quoted in Silvia Naef: ‘A la recherche d'une modernité arabe: I'évolution des arts plastiques en Egypte, au Liban et en Iraq.’ Doctoral thesis, University of Geneva, 1993.

7 ibid., 49.

8 See Karnouk, Liliane, Modern Egyptian art (Cairo, A.U.C., 1988) 13 for a description of some of the lurid details of Mukhtār's initiation ritualGoogle Scholar.

9 Vatikiotis, P.J., The modern history of Egypt (London, 1969), 244–5Google Scholar.

10 ibid., 246.

11 For a detailed and illustrated account of the early history and creation of the statue, see Abū Ghāzī, Badr al-Dīn: al-Maththāl Mukhtār (Cairo, 1964) 71ffGoogle Scholar.

12 Naghi, Effat, Christine, Roussillon and others (ed.), Mohamed Naghi (Les Cahiers de Chabramant, Cairo, n.d.) 51ffGoogle Scholar.

13 ibid., 27.

14 Excellent black and white photographs of this work may be consulted in Contemporary art in Egypt, edited by Hamed, Said (Egyptian Ministry of Culture Publication. Cairo, 1964), 116–20Google Scholar.

15 See the well known poem by Ahmad, Shawqī celebrating this event in al-Shawqiyyāt, vol.i (Cairo, n.d.), 266–74Google Scholar.

16 Naghi and Roussillon, op.cit, 27ff.

17 Jones, Roger and Penny, Nicholas, Raphael (New Haven, 1983), 7480Google Scholar.

18 For a complete account of the Islamic writings of the udabā’, see Dajani, Z.R., Egypt and the crisis of Islam (New York, 1990)Google Scholar.

19 Hourani, Albert, Arabic thought in the liberal age (Oxford, 1962) 327ffGoogle Scholar.

20 This is the reason suggested by Hourani for the publication of Ṭāhā Ḥusayn's book in 1938. There is no reason why it should not also apply to Muḥammad Nāgī's ‘School of Alexandria’.

21 Ostle, R.C.: ‘The romantic poets’ in M.M., Badawi (ed.): The Cambridge history of Arabic literature: modern Arabic literature, 110–15Google Scholar.

22 ibid.

23 Badawi, M.M., A critical introduction to modern Arabic poetry (Cambridge, 1975) 122–4Google Scholar.

24 Shādī, A.Z. Abū, al-Shafaq al-bākī (Cairo, 1926–1927), 50Google Scholar.

25 ibid., 178–9.

26 ibid., 322–4.

27 ibid., 207–8.

28 ibid., 750–2.

29 ibid., 142–4.

30 ibid., 545–7 and 719–20.

31 Shādī, A.Z. Abū, Aṭyāf al-rabī (Cairo, 1933) 47Google Scholar.

32 Apollo, September 1932, 44–6Google Scholar.

33 Apollo, September 1934, 4Google Scholar.

34 Hourani, Albert, Arabic thought in the liberal age, 324Google Scholar.