Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T03:28:08.722Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Note on Moral Insanity and Psychopathic Disorders

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

F. A. Whitlock
F. A. Whitlock*
Affiliation:
University of Queensland, Australia
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Despite a good deal of argument to the contrary (Maughs, 1941; Hunter and Macalpine, 1963; Walk, 1954; Walk and Walker, 1961; Craft, 1965; Whitlock, 1967) it is still commonly believed that Prichard's ‘moral insanity’ (1835) was the forerunner of our present-day concept of psychopathic (sociopathic) personality; the most recent example of this appearing in the paper by Davies and Feldman (1981), who write: ‘In 1801 Pinel described a condition termed by him manie sans délire, the notable feature of which was that the sufferer showed bouts of extreme violence but with no signs of psychosis … Prichard confirmed Pinel's observation and coined the term “moral insanity” which led to “a marked perversion of the natural impulses”.’ A number of modern textbooks (Sim, 1974; Friedman et al, 1975; Slater and Roth, 1977; Trethowan, 1979) also appear to regard moral insanity as the precursor of psychopathic disorder, although Trethowan correctly noted how the word ‘moral’ denoted ‘affective’ and was not being used in the usual ethical sense. He went on, however, to write that Prichard described cases showing antisocial or even criminal behaviour.

Type
Research Article
Information
Bulletin of the Royal College of Psychiatrists , Volume 6 , Issue 4 , April 1982 , pp. 57 - 59
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 1982

References

Battie, W. (1758) A Treatise on Madness. London: Whiston and White.Google Scholar
Craft, M. (1965) Ten Studies into Psychopathic Personality, pp. 7–9. Bristol: John Wright.Google Scholar
Davies, W. & Feldman, P. (1981) Diagnosis of psychopathy by forensic specialists. British Journal of Psychiatry, 138, 329–31.Google Scholar
Friedman, A., Kaplan, H. I. & Sadock, B. J. (1975) Comprehensive Textbook of Psychiatry, 2nd Edition, p. 1287. Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins.Google Scholar
Hadfield, J., case of (1800) 27 State Trials. 1281.Google Scholar
Hunter, R. & Macalpine, I. (1963) Three Hundred Years of Psychiatry, pp. 836–39. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Leigh, D. (1961) The Historical Development of British Psychiatry, pp. 172–84. Oxford: Pergamon.Google Scholar
Maudsley, H. (1874) Responsibility in Mental Disease. London: Henry S. King.Google Scholar
Maughs, S. (1941) Concepts of psychopathy and psychopathic personality: Its evolution and historical development. Journal of Criminal Psychopathology, 2, 329; 426.Google Scholar
Pinel, P. (1801) A Treatise on Insanity. Trans. 1806 by Davies, D. D., Republished 1962, pp. 150–56. New York: Hafner.Google Scholar
Prichard, J. C. (1835) A Treatise on Insanity. London: Sherwood, Gilbert and Piper.Google Scholar
Prichard, J. C. (1847) On the Different Forms of Insanity in Relation to Jurisprudence. London: Hippolyte Baillière.Google Scholar
Radnor Commission (1908) Report of the Royal Commission on the Care and Control of the Feeble-Minded, Vol. VIII, pp 189ff. HMSO.Google Scholar
Scott, P. D. (1960) The treatment of psychopaths. British Medical Journal, i, 1641–46.Google Scholar
Sim, M. (1974) Guide to Psychiatry, 3rd Edition, p. 429. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone.Google Scholar
Skae, D. (1863) A rational and practical classification of insanity. Journal of Mental Science, 9, 309–19.Google Scholar
Slater, E. & Roth, M. (1977) Clinical Psychiatry, 3rd Edition, p. 56. London: Baillière Tindall and Cassell.Google Scholar
Trethowan, W. H. (1979) Psychiatry, 4th Edition, p. 273. London: Baillière Tindall.Google Scholar
Tuke, D. H. (1885) Moral and emotional insanity. Journal of Mental Science, 31, 174; 366.Google Scholar
Tuke, D. H. (1892) Dictionary of Psychological Medicine, pp. 813–16. London: Churchill.Google Scholar
Walk, A. (1954) Some aspects of the ‘moral treatment’ of the insane. Journal of Mental Science, 100, 809.Google Scholar
Walk, A. & Walker, D. L. (1961) Gloucester and the beginnings of the RMPA. Journal of Mental Science, 107, 609–11.Google Scholar
Whitlock, F. A. (1967) Prichard and the concept of moral insanity. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 1, 72–79.Google Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.