Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T16:20:55.473Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The MRCPsych Examination: Time for Change?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

Mark Aveline
Affiliation:
St Ann's Hospital, Nottingham
Frank Margison
Affiliation:
Collegiate Trainees Committee
Chris Thompson
Affiliation:
Bethlem and Maudsley Hospitals
William Trethowan
Affiliation:
St Ann's Hospital, Nottingham
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Examinations loom large in the minds of trainees. Rightly, trainees see passing the MRCPsych as official confirmation that they have successfully concluded their period of general professional training and may now advance to higher training and, almost inevitably, to Consultant status. They may assume, and in this the College does nothing to dissuade them, that they have been tested in the skills needed to practise psychiatry. Enumeration of such facts as are to be enumerated and the observation of external behaviour stand high in the lexicon of success. Listening and understanding, tolerance and compassion are also-runs. The examination does not merely reflect the form of the training but dictates the order of priorities. What the exam values, the trainee values. What the exam ignores, the trainee, unless strongly motivated, will be tempted to ignore.

Type
Research Article
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 1982

References

Ellard, J. (1979) Writing up a psychotherapy case. Australia and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 13, 115–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.