Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T03:05:25.072Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A RIGIDITY PROPERTY OF PLURIHARMONIC MAPS FROM PROJECTIVE MANIFOLDS

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 October 2022

CHE-HUNG HUANG*
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Suppose M is a complex projective manifold of dimension $\geq 2$, V is the support of an ample divisor in M and U is an open set in M that intersects each irreducible component of V. We show that a pluriharmonic map $f:M\to N$ into a Kähler manifold N is holomorphic whenever $f\vert _{V\,\cap \, U}$ is holomorphic.

MSC classification

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Australian Mathematical Publishing Association Inc.

Sampson [Reference Sampson4] proved a unique continuation theorem for harmonic mappings of Riemannian manifolds. Siu [Reference Siu5] showed that a harmonic mapping of connected Kähler manifolds $f: M\to N$ is holomorphic whenever $f\vert _U$ is holomorphic for some nonempty open set $U\subset M$ . It is not difficult to see that, in general, U cannot be replaced by an analytic hypersurface $V\subset M$ . For example, take $f= \phi \times \psi $ , where $\phi : X\to Y$ is a holomorphic mapping of connected Kähler manifolds and $\psi :S\to Y$ is a harmonic map from a Riemann surface S. If $\psi $ is not holomorphic, then f is not holomorphic, but $f\vert _{X\times \{p\}}$ is holomorphic for every $p\in S$ .

Siu’s unique continuation theorem is a basic ingredient in the proof of the strong rigidity theorem for compact Kähler manifolds [Reference Siu5, Theorem 2]. Suppose $M\subset \mathbb {P}^k$ is a projective manifold of dimension $\geq 2$ and V is a smooth hyperplane section of M. We shall see that if $f:M\to N$ is a pluriharmonic map into a Kähler manifold N such that $f\vert _V$ is holomorphic, then f is holomorphic. This result is motivated by the application of Toledo’s theorem on plurisubharmonicity of the energy to rigidity theory [Reference Gromov, Pardalos and Rassias2, Reference Toledo6]. Note that we may weaken the assumption that $f\vert _V$ is holomorphic by applying Siu’s unique continuation theorem.

The main purpose of this note is to establish the following result.

Proposition 1. Suppose $f:M\to N$ is a pluriharmonic map from a projective manifold M into a Kähler manifold N, with ${dim}\, M \geq 2$ . Suppose $D=\sum _{i=1}^k a_i V_i$ is an ample divisor in M, where $a_i\in \mathbb {Z}$ , $a_i\neq 0$ , and $V_i$ is an irreducible hypersurface in M, for $i=1,\ldots ,k$ . Let V be the support of D and let U be an open set in M such that $V_i\hspace {0.02cm}\cap \hspace {0.02cm} U\neq \emptyset $ for each i. If $f\vert _{V\,\cap \, U}$ is holomorphic, then f is holomorphic.

Remark 2. Proposition 1 generalises the following result due to Gromov [Reference Gromov, Pardalos and Rassias2, Section 4.6] (see also [Reference Toledo6, Theorem 5]). Suppose $f:M\to N$ is a pluriharmonic map from a smooth projective surface M into a quotient $N=\Omega \,/\,\Gamma $ of an irreducible bounded symmetric domain $\Omega $ . If $f\vert _V$ is holomorphic for some general element V of a Lefschetz pencil on M, then f is holomorphic.

Proof of Proposition 1.

Let $\omega $ be a Kähler form on M representing the first Chern class $c_1(\mathcal {O}(D))$ associated to D and let $\omega _N = \sqrt {-1}\, h_{\alpha \overline {\beta }} \,dw^\alpha \wedge d \overline {w^\beta }$ denote the Kähler form on N. If $\phi :X\to N$ is a smooth map from an n-dimensional complex submanifold $X\subset M$ into N, we let $\omega _X=\omega \vert _X$ and $\varepsilon "(\phi )= \sqrt {-1}\, h_{\alpha \overline {\beta }} \,\partial \overline {\phi ^\beta }\wedge \overline {\partial } \phi ^\alpha $ , which are real $(1,1)$ -forms on X such that

$$ \begin{align*} \varepsilon"(\phi)\wedge \omega_X^{n-1}/(n-1)! =\vert\overline{\partial}\phi\vert^2\,\omega_X^n/n!\quad \text{if}\ n\geq 1,\end{align*} $$

and we define $E"(\phi )=\int _X\,\vert \overline {\partial }\phi \vert ^2\,dV_{\omega _X}$ provided that the integral is finite.

Since $c_1(\mathcal {O}(D))=[\omega ]$ is the Poincaré dual of the fundamental homology class $[D]$ of D,

(1) $$ \begin{align} E"(f)=\int_M\, \varepsilon"({f})\wedge\frac{\omega^{m-1}}{(m-1)!}=\sum_{i=1}^k\,a_i\cdot\int_{D_i}\,\hspace{-0.02cm} \varepsilon"(f\vert_{D_i})\wedge\frac{\omega_{D_i}^{m-2}}{(m-2)!}=\sum_{i=1}^k a_i E"(f\vert_{D_i}), \end{align} $$

where $m=\text {dim}\, M$ and $D_i$ is the smooth locus of $V_i$ for $1\leq i\leq k$ . Note that $\varepsilon "(f\vert _{D_i})= \varepsilon "(f)\vert _{D_i}$ for each i, and that $\varepsilon "(f)$ is closed because f is pluriharmonic [Reference Ohnita and Udagawa3, Lemma 3.10]. Since $f\vert _{V\,\cap \, U}$ is holomorphic, $f\vert _{D_i}$ is holomorphic for each i (see [Reference Siu5, pages 88–89]) and we conclude from (1) that f is holomorphic.

We shall see that the analogue of (1) holds for the Dirichlet energy $E(f)$ . Suppose that $f: M\to N$ is a pluriharmonic map from a projective manifold M of dimension $m\geq 2$ into a Riemannian manifold $(N, h=h_{ij}\,dy^i\otimes dy^{\,j})$ . We fix a Kähler form $\omega $ on M with integral cohomology class and choose a divisor $D=\sum _{i=1}^k a_i V_i$ such that $c_1(\mathcal {O}(D))=[\omega ]$ , where $a_i$ is a nonzero integer and $V_i$ is an irreducible hypersurface in M with smooth locus $D_i$ for each i.

Recall that if $\phi :X\to N$ is a smooth map from a Kähler submanifold $X\subset M$ , with Kähler form $\omega _X=\omega \vert _X$ , then the energy density $e(\phi )$ of $\phi $ is given by $e(\phi ) = \tfrac 12\vert {d}\phi \vert ^2=\langle \varepsilon (\phi ), \omega _X\rangle $ , where $\varepsilon (\phi )=\sqrt {-1}\,h_{ij}\,\partial \phi ^i\wedge \overline {\partial }\phi ^{\,j}$ is a real (1,1)-form on X, and the energy $E(\phi )$ of $\phi $ is given by $E(\phi )=\int _X e(\phi )\,d V_{\omega _X}$ .

Since f is pluriharmonic, the $(1,1)$ -form $\varepsilon (f)$ is closed (see, for example, [Reference Ohnita and Udagawa3, Lemma 2.2]). For $i=1,\ldots ,k$ , $\varepsilon (f)\vert _{D_i}= \varepsilon (f\vert _{D_i})$ . Since $c_1(\mathcal {O}(D))=[\omega ]$ is the Poincaré dual of $[D]$ , it follows that

(2) $$ \begin{align} E(f)=\int_M\, \varepsilon({f})\wedge\frac{\omega^{m-1}}{(m-1)!}=\sum_{i=1}^k\,a_i\cdot\int_{D_i}\,\hspace{-0.02cm} \varepsilon(f\vert_{D_i})\wedge\frac{\omega_{D_i}^{m-2}}{(m-2)!}=\sum_{i=1}^k a_i E(f\vert_{D_i}). \end{align} $$

Example 3. Suppose S is a compact Riemann surface of genus $g\geq 2$ . The Jacobian $J(S)$ of S is an Abelian variety with a principal polarisation $[\omega ]=c_1(\mathcal {O}(\Theta ))$ , where $\Theta $ is a theta divisor in $J(S)$ , that is, a translate of the zero locus of the Riemann theta function. Put $M=J(S)$ and let $f: M\to N$ be a pluriharmonic map into a Kähler manifold N. Then Proposition 1 shows that if $f\vert _G$ is holomorphic for some nonempty open subset G of $\Theta $ , then f is holomorphic.

Let $W=\mu (S)$ be the image of S under the Abel–Jacobi map $\mu : S\to J(S)$ . We have

$$ \begin{align*}E"(f)=\int_M\, \varepsilon"({f})\wedge\frac{\omega^{g-1}}{(g-1)!}=\int_{W}\,\hspace{-0.02cm} \varepsilon"(f\vert_{W})= E"(f\vert_{W}), \end{align*} $$

since $[({1}/{(g-1)!})\,\omega ^{g-1}]$ is the Poincaré dual of $[W]$ (see, for example, [Reference Griffiths and Harris1, page 350]). Similarly, $E(f)=E(f\vert _W)$ . Using (1) and (2), we conclude that

$$ \begin{align*}E"(f)=E"(f\vert_{\Theta^*})=E"(f\vert_W)\quad \text{and}\quad E(f)=E(f\vert_{\Theta^*})=E(f\vert_W),\end{align*} $$

where $\Theta ^*$ denotes the smooth locus of $\Theta $ . As in the proof of Proposition 1, it follows that if $f\vert _G$ is holomorphic for some nonempty open subset G of W, then f is holomorphic.

References

Griffiths, P. and Harris, J., Principles of Algebraic Geometry (Wiley, Hoboken, NJ, 1978).Google Scholar
Gromov, M., ‘Super stable Kählerian horseshoe?’, in: Essays in Mathematics and Its Applications (eds. Pardalos, P. M. and Rassias, T. M.) (Springer, Berlin–Heidelberg, 2012), 151229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ohnita, Y. and Udagawa, S., ‘Stablility, complex-analyticity and constancy of pluriharmonic maps from compact Kähler manifolds’, Math. Z. 205 (1990), 629644.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sampson, J. H., ‘Some properties and applications of harmonic mappings’, Ann. Sci. Éc. Norm. Supér. (4) 11 (1978), 211228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Siu, Y.-T., ‘The complex-analyticity of harmonic maps and the strong rigidity of compact Kähler manifolds’, Ann. of Math. (2) 112 (1980), 73111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Toledo, D., ‘Hermitian curvature and plurisubharmonicity of energy on Teichmüller space’, Geom. Funct. Anal. 22 (2012), 10151032.CrossRefGoogle Scholar