Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T18:58:15.643Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A radius of convexity problem

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 April 2009

M.L. Mogra
Affiliation:
School of Mathematical Sciences, University of Khartoum, PO Box 321, Khartoum, Sudan;
O.P. Juneja
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, Indian Institute of Technology, Kanpur 208016, India.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The authors determine the sharp radius of convexity for functions analytic and starlike in the unit disc having power series representation of the form where an+1 is fixed. The estimate obtained is an improvement over the corresponding fixed second coefficient result. It is expected that this approach will lead to sharpening and improvement of a number of earlier known results.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Australian Mathematical Society 1981

References

[1]Gronwall, T.H., “On the distortion in conformal mapping when the second coefficient in the mapping function has an assigned value”, Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 6 (1920), 300302.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
[2]Juneja, O.P. and Mogra, M.L., “Radii of convexity for certain classes of univalent analytic functions”, Pacific J. Math. 78 (1978), 359368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[3]Juneja, Om Prakash and Mogra, Manak Lal, “A class of univalent functions”, Bull. Sci. Math. (2) 103 (1979),435447.Google Scholar
[4]McCarty, Carl P., “Two radius of convexity problems”, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 42 (1974), 153160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[5]Nehari, Zeev, Conformal mapping (McGraw-Hill, New York, Toronto, London, 1952).Google Scholar
[6]Robertson, Malcolm I.S., “On the theory of univalent functions”, Ann. of Math. (2) 37 (1936), 374408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[7]Schild, Albert, “On a problem in conformal mapping of schlicht functions”, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 4 (1953),4351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[8]Singh, V. and Goel, R.M., “On radii of convexity and starlikeness of some classes of functions”, J. Math. Soc. Japan 23 (1971), 323339.Google Scholar
[9]Silverman, H. and Silvia, E.M., “The influence of the second coefficient on prestarlike functions”, Rocky Mountain J. Math. 10 (1980), 469474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[10]Tepper, David E., “On the radius of convexity and boundary distortion of schlicht functions”, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 150 (1970), 519528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar