No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
PRODUCTS OF BASE-κ-PARACOMPACT SPACES AND COMPACT SPACES
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 21 July 2011
Abstract
Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Let λ be a regular ordinal with λ≥ω1. Then we prove that (λ+1)×λ is not base-countably metacompact. This implies that base-κ-paracompactness is not an inverse invariant of perfect mappings, which answers a question asked by Yamazaki.
Keywords
MSC classification
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Bulletin of the Australian Mathematical Society , Volume 84 , Issue 3 , December 2011 , pp. 387 - 392
- Copyright
- Copyright © Australian Mathematical Publishing Association Inc. 2011
References
[1]Gruenhage, G., ‘Base-paracompactness and base-normality of GO-spaces’, Questions Answers Gen. Topology 23 (2005), 137–141.Google Scholar
[2]Kemoto, N., Ohta, H. and Tamano, K., ‘Products of spaces of ordinal numbers’, Topology Appl. 45 (1992), 245–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[3]Kemoto, N. and Smith, K. D., ‘Hereditary countable metacompactness in finite and infinite product spaces of ordinals’, Topology Appl. 77 (1997), 57–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[4]Kunen, K., Set Theory. An Introduction to Independence Proofs (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1980).Google Scholar
[5]Morita, K., ‘Paracompactness and product spaces’, Fund. Math. 50 (1961/62), 223–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[6]Mou, L., ‘Base-normality and total paracompactness of subspaces of products of two ordinals’, Sci. Math. Jpn. 63 (2006), 89–100.Google Scholar
[7]Mou, L., Wang, R. and Wang, S., ‘Base metacompact spaces’, Adv. Math. 40 (2011), 111–117.Google Scholar
[8]Porter, J. E., ‘Base-paracompact spaces’, Topology Appl. 128 (2003), 145–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[9]Yamazaki, K., ‘Base-normality and product spaces’, Topology Appl. 148 (2005), 123–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
You have
Access