Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-03T19:19:12.962Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

ON SUPERNILPOTENT RADICALS WITH THE AMITSUR PROPERTY

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 June 2009

HALINA FRANCE-JACKSON*
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics and Applied Mathematics, Summerstrand Campus (South), Nelson Mandela Metropolitan University, PO Box 77000, Port Elizabeth 6031, South Africa (email: [email protected])
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

A radical α has the Amitsur property if α(A[x])=(α(A[x])∩A)[x] for all rings A. For rings RS with the same unity, we call S a finite centralizing extension of R if there exist b1,b2,…,btS such that S=b1R+b2R+⋯+btR and bir=rbi for all rR and i=1,2,…,t. A radical α is FCE-friendly if α(S)∩Rα(R) for any finite centralizing extension S of a ring R. We show that if α is a supernilpotent radical whose semisimple class contains the ring ℤ of all integers and α is FCE-friendly, then α has the Amitsur property. In this way the Amitsur property of many well-known radicals such as the prime radical, the Jacobson radical, the Brown–McCoy radical, the antisimple radical and the Behrens radical can be established. Moreover, applying this condition, we will show that the upper radical 𝒰(*k) generated by the essential cover *k of the class * of all *-rings has the Amitsur property and 𝒰(*k)(A[x])=𝒰(*k)(A)[x], where a semiprime ring R is called a *-ring if the factor ring R/I is prime radical for every nonzero ideal I of R. The importance of *-rings stems from the fact that a *-ring A is Jacobson semisimple if and only if A is a primitive ring.

MSC classification

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Australian Mathematical Publishing Association Inc. 2009

References

[1]Amitsur, S. A., ‘Radicals of polynomial rings’, Canad. J. Math. 8 (1956), 355361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[2]Andrunakievich, V. A. and Ryabukhin, Yu. M., Radicals of Algebra and Structure Theory (Nauka, Moscow, 1979), in Russian.Google Scholar
[3]Ferrero, M. and Wisbauer, R., ‘Unitary strongly prime rings and related radicals’, J. Pure Appl. Algebra 181 (2003), 209226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[4]France-Jackson, H., ‘On atoms of the lattice of supernilpotent radicals’, Quaest. Math. 10 (1987), 251256.Google Scholar
[5]France-Jackson, H., ‘Rings related to special atoms’, Quaest. Math. 24 (2001), 105109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[6]Gardner, B. J., ‘Some recent results and open problems concerning special radicals’, in: Radical Theory, Proceedings of the 1988 Sendai Conference, Sendai, 24–30 July 1988 (ed. S. Kyono) (Uchida Rokakuho, Tokyo, 1989), pp. 2556.Google Scholar
[7]Gardner, B. J. and Wiegandt, R., Radical Theory of Rings (Marcel Dekker, New York, 2004).Google Scholar
[8]Korolczuk, H., ‘A note on the lattice of special radicals’, Bull. Pol. Acad. Sci. Math. 29 (1981), 103104.Google Scholar
[9]McConnell, J. C. and Robson, J. C., Noncommutative Noetherian Rings (John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, 1987).Google Scholar
[10]McCoy, N. H., The Theory of Rings (MacMillan, New York, 1964).Google Scholar
[11]Lee, P.-H. and Puczylowski, E. R., ‘On the Behrens radical of matrix rings and polynomial rings’, J. Pure Appl. Algebra 212 (2008), 21632169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar