Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T14:50:14.321Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On super efficiency in set-valued optimisation in locally convex spaces

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 April 2009

Yihong Xu  and
Chuanxi Zhu
Yihong Xu
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi 330047, People's Republic of China, e-mail: [email protected]
Chuanxi Zhu
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi 330047, People's Republic of China, e-mail: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The set-valued optimisation problem with constraints is considered in the sense of super efficiency in locally convex linear topological spaces. Under the assumption of nearly cone-subconvexlikeness, by applying the separation theorem for convex sets, Kuhn-Tucker and Lagrange necessary conditions for the set-valued optimisation problem to attain its super efficient solutions are obtained. Also, Kuhn-Tucker and Lagrange sufficient conditions are derived. Finally two kinds of unconstrained programs equivalent to set-valued optimisation problems are established.

Type
Research Article
Information
Bulletin of the Australian Mathematical Society , Volume 71 , Issue 2 , April 2005 , pp. 183 - 192
Copyright
Copyright © Australian Mathematical Society 2005

References

[1]Chen, G.Y. and Rong, W.D., ‘Characterizations of the Benson proper efficiency for non-convex vector optimization’, J. Optim. Theory Appl. 98 (1998), 365–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[2]Li, Z., ‘A theorem of the alternative and its application to the optimization of set-valued maps’, J. Optim. Theory Appl. 100 (1999), 365–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[3]Borwein, J.M. and Zhung, D.M., ‘Superefficiency in vector optimization’, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 338 (1993), 105–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[4]Zheng, X.Y., ‘Proper efficiency in locally convex topological vector spaces’, J. Optim. Theory Appl. 94 (1997), 469–486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[5]Zheng, X.Y., ‘The domination property for efficiency in locally convex spaces’, J. Math. Anal. Appl. 213 (1997), 455–467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[6]Yang, X.M., Li, D. and Wang, S.Y., ‘Nearly-subconvexlikeness in vector optimization with set-valued functions’, J. Optim. Theory Appl. 110 (2001), 413–427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[7]Qiu, Q.S. and Fu, W.T., ‘The connectedness of the super efficient solution sets of the optimization problem for a set-valued mapping’, (in Chinese), J. Systems Sci. Math. Sci. 22 (2002), 107–114.Google Scholar
[8]Hu, Y.D. and Ling, C., ‘Connectedness of cone superefficient point sets in locally convex topological vector spaces’, J. Optim. Theory Appl. 107 (2000), 433–446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[9]Cheng, Y.H. and Fu, W.T., ‘Strong efficiency in a locally convex space’, Math. Methods Oper. Res. 50 (1999), 373–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar