Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T21:12:40.505Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

ON LATTICES OF RADICALS IN THE CLASS OF ALL FINITE GROUPS

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 February 2012

JAN KREMPA*
Affiliation:
Institute of Mathematics, University of Warsaw ul. Banacha 2, 02-097 Warszawa, Poland (email: [email protected])
IZABELA AGATA MALINOWSKA
Affiliation:
Institute of Mathematics, University of Białystok, ul. Akademicka 2, 15-267 Białystok, Poland (email: [email protected])
*
For correspondence; e-mail: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Lattices of radicals have been extensively studied, for example in the class of associative rings, leading to some interesting results. In this paper we investigate the lattice L of all radicals in the class of all finite groups. We also consider some of its important sublattices. In particular, we prove that the lattice L is closed to being modular, the lattice Lh of all hereditary radicals is a Boolean algebra, and there exists a natural, useful projection of the lattice L onto Lh.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Australian Mathematical Publishing Association Inc. 2012

References

[1]Bagiński, C. and Stocka, A., ‘Finite groups with L-free lattices of subgroups’, Illinois J. Math. 52 (2008), 887900.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[2]Doerk, K. and Hawkes, T., Finite Soluble Groups (Walter de Gruyter, Berlin–New York, 1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[3]Gardner, B. J., Radical Theory, Pitman Research Notes in Mathematics, 198 (Longman Sci. & Tech, 1989).Google Scholar
[4]Gardner, B. J. and Wiegandt, R., Radical Theory of Rings, Monographs and Textbooks in Pure and Applied Mathematics, 261 (Marcel Dekker, New York, 2004).Google Scholar
[5]Grätzer, G., General Lattice Theory, 2nd edn (Birkhäuser, Basel, 1998).Google Scholar
[6]Huppert, B. and Blackburn, N., Finite Groups III (Springer, Berlin, 1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[7]Krempa, J. and Malinowska, I., ‘On Kurosh-Amitsur radicals of finite groups’, An. Ştiinţ. Univ. ‘Ovidius’, Constanţa, Ser. Mat. 19(1) (2011), 175190.Google Scholar
[8]Krempa, J. and Sakowicz, A., ‘On uniform dimension of finite groups’, Colloq. Math. 89(2) (2001), 223231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[9]Krempa, J. and Terlikowska-Osłowska, B., On Uniform Dimension of Lattices, Contributions to General Algebra, 9 (Teubner, Stuttgart, 1995), pp. 219230.Google Scholar
[10]Lennox, J. C. and Stonehewer, S. E., Subnormal Subgroups of Groups (Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1987).Google Scholar
[11]Malinowska, I. A., ‘On finite nearly uniform groups’, Publ. Math. Debrecen 69 (2006), 155169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[12]Neumann, P. M., ‘On the structure of standard wreath product of groups’, Math. Z. 84 (1964), 343373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[13]Puczyłowski, E. R., ‘Some questions concerning radicals of associative rings’, in: Theory of Radicals (Szekszard 1991) (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1993), pp. 209227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[14]Shemetkov, L. A., Skiba, A. N. and Vorob’ev, N. N., ‘On lattices of formations of finite groups’, Algebra Colloq. 17 (2010), 557564.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[15]Snider, R. L., ‘Lattices of radicals’, Pacific J. Math. 40 (1972), 207220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[16]Terlikowska-Osłowska, B., ‘Category with a selfdual set of axioms’, Bull. Acad. Polon. Sci. 25 (1977), 12071214.Google Scholar
[17]Widiger, A., ‘Lattices of radicals for hereditary artinian rings’, Math. Nachr. 84 (1978), 301309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar