Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T06:51:52.739Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

ON A CONJECTURE OF LENNY JONES ABOUT CERTAIN MONOGENIC POLYNOMIALS

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 November 2023

SUMANDEEP KAUR
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, Panjab University, Chandigarh, India e-mail: [email protected]
SURENDER KUMAR*
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, Indian Institute of Technology (IIT), Bhilai, India
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Let $K={\mathbb {Q}}(\theta )$ be an algebraic number field with $\theta $ satisfying a monic irreducible polynomial $f(x)$ of degree n over ${\mathbb {Q}}.$ The polynomial $f(x)$ is said to be monogenic if $\{1,\theta ,\ldots ,\theta ^{n-1}\}$ is an integral basis of K. Deciding whether or not a monic irreducible polynomial is monogenic is an important problem in algebraic number theory. In an attempt to answer this problem for a certain family of polynomials, Jones [‘A brief note on some infinite families of monogenic polynomials’, Bull. Aust. Math. Soc. 100 (2019), 239–244] conjectured that if $n\ge 3$, $1\le m\le n-1$, $\gcd (n,mB)=1$ and A is a prime number, then the polynomial $x^n+A (Bx+1)^m\in {\mathbb {Z}}[x]$ is monogenic if and only if $n^n+(-1)^{n+m}B^n(n-m)^{n-m}m^mA$ is square-free. We prove that this conjecture is true.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Australian Mathematical Publishing Association Inc.

1 Introduction and statements of results

Let $K={\mathbb {Q}}(\theta )$ be an algebraic number field and let $f(x)$ of degree n be the minimal polynomial of $\theta $ over ${\mathbb {Q}}$ . The polynomial $f(x)$ is said to be monogenic if $\{1,\theta ,\ldots ,\theta ^{n-1}\}$ is an integral basis of K.

Denote the ring of algebraic integers of K by ${\mathbb {Z}}_K$ . The field K is said to be monogenic if there exists $\alpha \in {\mathbb {Z}}_K$ such that ${\mathbb {Z}}_K={\mathbb {Z}}[\alpha ].$ It is well known that if $f(x)$ is monogenic, then the number field K is monogenic but the converse is not always true (for example, ${\mathbb {Q}}(\sqrt {d}),$ where $d\ne 1$ is a square-free integer congruent to $1$ modulo $4$ ).

The discriminant of a monic polynomial over a field $\mathbb {F}$ of degree n having roots $\theta _1, \ldots , \theta _n$ in the algebraic closure of $\mathbb {F}$ is $\Delta _f=\prod _{1\leq i<j\leq n}^{}(\theta _i-\theta _j)^2.$ It is a classical result in algebraic number theory that if $f(x)$ is the minimal polynomial of an algebraic integer $\theta $ over ${\mathbb {Q}}$ , then the discriminant $ \Delta _f$ of $f(x)$ and the discriminant $d_K$ of $K={\mathbb {Q}}(\theta )$ are related by the formula

(1.1) $$ \begin{align} \Delta_f=[{\mathbb{Z}}_K:{\mathbb{Z}}[\theta]]^2d_K. \end{align} $$

Clearly if $\Delta_f$ is square-free, then $f(x)$ is monogenic but the converse need not be true. Jones [Reference Jones4, Reference Jones6] constructed infinite families of monogenic polynomials having non square-free discriminant. In [Reference Jones7], Jones showed that there exist infinitely many primes $p \kern1.3pt{\geq }\kern1.3pt 3$ and integers $t \kern1.4pt{\geq}\kern1.4pt 1$ coprime to p, such that ${f(x) \kern1.3pt{=}\kern1.3pt x^p \kern1.3pt{-}\kern1.3pt 2ptx^{p-1} \kern1.3pt{+}\kern1.3pt p^2t^2x^{p-2} \kern1.3pt{+}\kern1.3pt 1}$ is nonmonogenic and, in [Reference Jones5], he gave infinite families of monogenic polynomials using a new discriminant formula.

Throughout the paper, $f(x)=x^n+A(Bx+1)^m\in {\mathbb {Z}}[x]$ is an irreducible polynomial with $n\ge 3$ and $1\le m\le n-1$ , $\theta $ is a root of f, $K={\mathbb {Q}}(\theta )$ is the corresponding algebraic number field, $\Delta _f$ denotes the discriminant of $f(x)$ and $\mathrm {Ind}_K(\theta )$ denotes the group index $ [{\mathbb {Z}}_K: {\mathbb {Z}}[\theta ]]$ . From [Reference Jones4, Theorem 3.1],

(1.2) $$ \begin{align} \Delta_f=(-1)^{{n(n-1)}/{2}}A^{n-1}[n^n+(-1)^{n+m}B^n(n-m)^{n-m}m^mA]. \end{align} $$

Theorem 1.1. Let $A,B,n,m$ be integers with $1\le m\le n-1, n> 2$ and $B\ne 0.$ Assume that $\gcd (n,mB)=1.$ Then an irreducible polynomial of the type $f(x)=x^n+A (Bx+1)^m$ is monogenic if and only if both A and $n^n+(-1)^{n+m}B^n(n-m)^{n-m}m^mA$ are square-free.

Remark 1.2. In Theorem 1.1, the assumption that $\gcd (n,mB)=1$ cannot be dropped. For example, consider the polynomial $f(x){\kern-1pt}={\kern-1pt}x^3{\kern-1pt}-{\kern-1pt}6(3x+{\kern-1pt}1)$ . Here $n{\kern-1pt}={\kern-1pt}3, m{\kern-1pt}={\kern-1pt}1, A{\kern-1pt}={\kern-1pt}-6$ and $B=3.$ Note that $f(x)$ is irreducible over ${\mathbb {Q}}.$ The polynomial $f(x)$ is monogenic and has discriminant $\Delta _f=23.2^2.3^5.$ However, $n^n+(-1)^{n+m}B^n(n-m)^{n-m}m^mA=23.3^3$ is not square-free.

The following corollary is an immediate consequence of Theorem 1.1. It is conjectured by Jones in [Reference Jones4, Conjecture 4.1].

Corollary 1.3. Let p be a prime number, and $n, m$ and B be positive integers with $1\le m\le n-1,~n>2$ and $\gcd (n,mB)=1.$ Then $f(x)=x^n+p(Bx+1)^m$ is monogenic if and only if $n^n+(-1)^{n+m}B^n(n-m)^{n-m}m^mp$ is square-free.

Example 1.4. Let p be an odd prime number and let $a,b$ be positive integers with $n>2$ . Consider the polynomial $f(x)=x^n+ax^2+bx+p$ with $b^2=4ap.$ Note that $f(x)$ satisfies Eisenstein’s criterion with respect to p, so it is irreducible over ${\mathbb {Q}}$ . The polynomial $x^n+ax^2+bx+p$ with $b^2=4ap$ can be reduced to the form $x^n+p(Bx+1)^2$ with $B={b}/{2p}.$ If $\gcd (n,2B)=1,$ that is, $\gcd (n,{b}/{p})=1,$ then Corollary 1.3 implies that $f(x)$ is monogenic if and only if $n^n+(-1)^n4({b}/{2p})^n({n-2})^{n-2}p$ is square-free.

Example 1.5. Let B be an integer not divisible by $3$ with $|B|\ge 4$ and let $A\neq \pm 1$ be a nonzero square-free integer. Then the polynomial $f(x)=x^3+A(Bx+1)^2$ is irreducible by Perron’s criterion, which states that if ${f(x)=x^n+a_{n-1}x^{n-1}+\cdots +a_1x+a_0\in {\mathbb {Z}}[x]}$ with $a_0\ne 0 \hspace {0.1in} \text {and}~ \hspace {0.1in} |a_{n-1}|>1+|a_{n-2}|+\cdots +|a_0|,$ then the polynomial $f(x)$ is irreducible over $\mathbb {Q}$ . In view of Theorem 1.1, the polynomial $x^3+A(Bx+1)^2$ is monogenic if and only if $4AB^3-27$ is square-free.

2 Preliminary results

In what follows, for a prime number p and a given polynomial $g(x) \in {\mathbb {Z}}[x],~ \overline{g} (x)$ will denote the polynomial obtained by reducing each coefficient of $ g(x)$ modulo $p $ .

Let $f(x)\in {\mathbb {Z}}[x]$ be a monic irreducible polynomial having a root $\theta $ and let $L={\mathbb {Q}}(\theta )$ be an algebraic number field. In 1878, Dedekind proved the following criterion which gives a necessary and sufficient condition to be satisfied by $f(x)$ so that p does not divide $\mathrm {Ind}_L(\theta )$ .

Theorem 2.1 (Dedekind’s criterion, [Reference Dedekind2]; see also [Reference Cohen1, Theorem 6.1.4]).

Let $L=\mathbb {Q}(\theta )$ be an algebraic number field and $f(x)$ the minimal polynomial of the algebraic integer $\theta $ over $\mathbb {Q}.$ Let p be a prime and $\overline {f}(x) = \overline {g}_{1}(x)^{e_{1}}\cdots \overline {g}_{t}(x)^{e_{t}}$ be the factorisation of $\overline {f}(x)$ as a product of powers of distinct irreducible polynomials over $\mathbb {Z}/p\mathbb {Z},$ with each $g_{i}(x)\in \mathbb {Z}[x]$ monic. Let $M(x) = (f(x)-g_{1}(x)^{e_{1}}\cdots g_{t}(x)^{e_{t}})/p \in \mathbb {Z}[x]$ . Then p does not divide $\mathrm {Ind}_L(\theta )$ if and only if, for each i, either $e_{i}=1$ or $ \overline{g}_{i}(x)$ does not divide $\overline {M}(x).$

With the notation as in Theorem 2.1, one can easily check that if $f(x)$ is monogenic, then for each prime p dividing $\Delta _f$ , either $e_i=1$ or $ \overline{g}_i(x)$ does not divide $\overline {M}(x)$ for each i.

Definition 2.2. A polynomial $a_nx^n+a_{n-1}x^{n-1}+\cdots +a_0$ in ${\mathbb {Z}}[x]$ with $a_n\ne 0$ is called an Eisenstein polynomial with respect to a prime p if $p\nmid a_n,$ $p\mid a_i$ for $0\le i\le n-1$ and $p^2\nmid a_0.$

The following result is known as Eisenstein’s criterion (see [Reference Ireland and Rosen3]). It will be used in the proof of Corollary 1.3.

Theorem 2.3. Let $g(x)=a_nx^n+a_{n-1}x^{n-1}+\cdots +a_0\in {\mathbb {Z}}[x]$ with $n\ge 1.$ If there is a prime number p such that $ p\nmid a_n, p\mid a_{n-1},\ldots , p\mid a_0$ and $p^2\nmid a_0,$ then $g(x)$ is irreducible over ${\mathbb {Q}}$ .

The following lemma will be used in the proof of Theorem 1.1.

Lemma 2.4 [Reference Narkiewicz8, Lemma 2.17].

Let $\alpha $ be an algebraic integer and let $L={\mathbb {Q}}(\alpha )$ . If the minimal polynomial of $\alpha $ over ${\mathbb {Q}}$ is an Eisenstein polynomial with respect to the prime $p,$ then $\mathrm {Ind}_L(\alpha )$ is not divisible by $p.$

3 Proof of Theorem 1.1 and Corollary 1.3

Proof of Theorem 1.1.

Clearly $A\ne 0.$ Suppose that $\theta $ is a root of $f(x)$ and $K={\mathbb {Q}}(\theta )$ . From (1.2),

$$ \begin{align*}\Delta_f=(-1)^{{n(n-1)}/{2}}A^{n-1}[n^n+(-1)^{n+m}B^n(n-m)^{n-m}m^mA].\end{align*} $$

First suppose that the polynomial $f(x)$ is monogenic. Then $\mathrm {Ind}_K(\theta )=1.$ Let p be a prime dividing $\Delta _f$ . The following cases arise.

Case 1: $p\mid A$ . Then $f(x)\equiv x^n\,\mod p$ and $M(x)=A(Bx+1)^m/p$ . As $n\ge 3$ , by Dedekind’s criterion, we see that $\overline{x}$ should not divide $\overline {M}(x).$ This implies that $p^2\nmid A.$ Thus, A is square-free. Suppose that $p^2$ divides $(n^n+(-1)^{n+m}B^n(n-m)^{n-m}m^mA).$ Then the hypothesis $p\mid A$ implies that $p\mid n.$ Since $n\ge 3$ and A is square-free, we have $p\mid B^n(n-m)^{n-m}m^m,$ that is, $p\mid m(n-m)B,$ which is not true because $\gcd (n,mB)= 1.$ It follows that $p^2$ cannot divide $(n^n+(-1)^{n+m}B^n(n-m)^{n-m}m^mA)$ and so $ (n^n+(-1)^{n+m}B^n(n-m)^{n-m}m^mA)$ is square-free.

Case 2: $p\nmid A$ . Then p will divide $(n^n+(-1)^{n+m}B^n(n-m)^{n-m}m^mA).$ Keeping in mind the hypothesis $\gcd (n,mB)=1,$ it is easy to see that $p\nmid n$ and so $p\nmid Bm(n-m)$ . Let $\alpha $ be a repeated root of $\overline{f}(x)=x^n+\overline{A}(\overline{B}x+1)^m$ in the algebraic closure of ${\mathbb {Z}}/p{\mathbb {Z}}.$ Then

$$ \begin{align*} \alpha^n+A(B\alpha+1)^m\equiv 0\,\mod p \end{align*} $$

and

$$ \begin{align*} n\alpha^{n-1}+mAB(B\alpha+1)^{m-1}\equiv 0\,\mod p. \end{align*} $$

So $n\alpha ^{n-1}\equiv -mAB(B\alpha +1)^{m-1}\,\mod p.$ By substitution,

$$ \begin{align*}-\alpha mAB(B\alpha+1)^{m-1}+n A(B\alpha+1)^{m}\equiv0\,\mod p,\end{align*} $$

that is,

$$ \begin{align*}(B\alpha+1)^{m-1}(\alpha AB(n-m)+nA)\equiv 0\,\mod p.\end{align*} $$

If $B\alpha +1\equiv 0\,\mod p,$ then $\alpha \equiv -{1}/{B}\,\mod p,$ which yields the contradiction ${(-1)^n}/{\overline {B}^n}=\overline {f}({-1}//{\overline {B}})=\overline {f}(\overline {\alpha })=0.$ Thus, $\alpha AB(n-m)+nA\equiv 0\,\mod p,$ so that

(3.1) $$ \begin{align} \alpha\equiv -\frac{nA}{AB(n-m)}\,\mod p \end{align} $$

is the unique repeated root of $\overline {f}(x)$ in ${\mathbb {Z}}/p{\mathbb {Z}}$ and it is easy to show that $\alpha $ has multiplicity $2.$ So, assuming that $\alpha $ is a positive integer satisfying (3.1), we can write

$$ \begin{align*} f(x) & =(x-\alpha+\alpha)^n+A(B(x-\alpha+\alpha)+1)^m,\\ & =\displaystyle\sum_{k=0}^{n}\binom{n}{k}\alpha^{n-k}(x-\alpha)^k+A\bigg(\displaystyle\sum_{k=0}^{m}\binom{m}{k}(B\alpha+1)^{m-k}B^k(x-\alpha)^k\bigg),\\ & =(x-\alpha)^2h(x)+f'(\alpha)(x-\alpha)+f(\alpha), \end{align*} $$

where $f'(x)$ is the derivative of $f(x)$ and

$$ \begin{align*}h(x)=\displaystyle\sum_{k=2}^{n}\binom{n}{k}\alpha^{n-k}(x-\alpha)^{k-2}+A\bigg(\displaystyle\sum_{k=2}^{m}\binom{m}{k}(B\alpha+1)^{m-k}B^k(x-\alpha)^{k-2}\bigg)\end{align*} $$

is in ${\mathbb {Z}}[x].$ Then $\overline {f}(x)=(x-\overline {\alpha })^2\overline {h}(x),$ where $\overline {h}(x)\in {\mathbb {Z}}[x]$ is separable. Let $\prod _{i=1}^{t} \overline{h}_i(x)$ be the factorisation of $\overline {h}(x)$ into a product of distinct irreducible polynomials $\overline {h}_i(x)\in {\mathbb {Z}}/p{\mathbb {Z}}[x]$ with each $h_i(x)\in {\mathbb {Z}}[x]$ monic. Then we can write

$$ \begin{align*} f(x)=(x-\alpha)^2\bigg(\displaystyle\prod_{i=1}^{t}h_i(x)+p g(x)\bigg)+f'(\alpha)(x-\alpha)+f(\alpha), \end{align*} $$

for some polynomial $g(x)\in {\mathbb {Z}}[x]$ . This implies that

$$ \begin{align*}M(x)=\frac{1}{p}[p (x-\alpha)^2g(x)+(x-\alpha)f'(\alpha)+f(\alpha)].\end{align*} $$

In view of Dedekind’s criterion and the hypothesis that $f(x)$ is monogenic, we see that $f(\alpha )\not \equiv 0\,\mod p^2.$ Equivalently,

$$ \begin{align*}(n^n+(-1)^{n+m}(n-m)^{n-m}m^mB^nA)\not\equiv 0\,\mod p^2.\end{align*} $$

Hence, $(n^n+(-1)^{n+m}(n-m)^{n-m}m^mB^nA)$ is square-free.

Conversely, suppose A and $(n^n+(-1)^{n+m}(n-m)^{n-m}m^mB^nA)$ are square-free. If $A=\pm 1,$ then using (1.1), we see that $\mathrm {Ind}_K(\theta )=1,$ that is, $f(x)$ is monogenic. If p be a prime divisor of $A,$ then $f(x)$ is an Eisenstein polynomial with respect to the prime p. Therefore, by Lemma 2.4, $p\nmid \mathrm {Ind}_K(\theta ).$ Hence, by (1.1), $f(x)$ is monogenic. This completes the proof of the theorem.

Proof of Corollary 1.3.

It is easy to verify that $f(x)$ satisfies Eisenstein’s criterion with respect to the prime $p.$ So $f(x)$ is an irreducible polynomial. Hence, the result follows from Theorem 1.1.

Footnotes

The first author is grateful to the Council of Scientific and Industrial Research, New Delhi for providing financial support in the form of Senior Research Fellowship through Grant No. 09/135(0878)/2019-EMR-1.

The second author is grateful to the University Grants Commission, New Delhi, for providing financial support in the form of Senior Research Fellowship through Ref No.1129/(CSIR-NET JUNE 2019).

References

Cohen, H., A Course in Computational Algebraic Number Theory (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, 1993).10.1007/978-3-662-02945-9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dedekind, R., ‘Über den Zusammenhang zwischen der Theorie der Ideale und der Theorie der höheren Kongruenzen’, Götttingen Abh. 23 (1878), 123.Google Scholar
Ireland, K. and Rosen, M., A Classical Introduction to Modern Number Theory, 2nd edn, Graduate Texts in Mathematics, 84 (Springer, New York, 1990).10.1007/978-1-4757-2103-4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, L., ‘A brief note on some infinite families of monogenic polynomials’, Bull. Aust. Math. Soc. 100 (2019), 239244.10.1017/S0004972719000182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, L., ‘Generating infinite families of monogenic polynomials using a new discriminant formula’, Albanian J. Math. 14 (2020), 3745.10.51286/albjm/1608313765CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, L., ‘Some new infinite families of monogenic polynomials with non-squarefree discriminant’, Acta Arith. 197 (2021), 213219.10.4064/aa200211-21-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, L., ‘On necessary and sufficient conditions for the monogeneity of a certain class of polynomials’, Math. Slovaca 72(3) (2022), 591600.10.1515/ms-2022-0039CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Narkiewicz, W., Elementary and Analytic Theory of Algebraic Numbers, 3rd edn, Springer Monographs in Mathematics (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2004).10.1007/978-3-662-07001-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar