Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T07:00:53.830Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

LOCALLY NILPOTENT SUBGROUPS OF $\mathrm {GL}_n(D)$

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 November 2024

R. FALLAH-MOGHADDAM*
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics Education, Farhangian University, P.O. Box 14665-889, Tehran, Iran
H. R. DORBIDI
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Science, University of Jiroft, Jiroft 78671-61167, Iran e-mail: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Let A be an F-central simple algebra of degree $m^2=\prod _{i=1}^k p_i^{2\alpha _i}$ and G be a subgroup of the unit group of A such that $F[G]=A$. We prove that if G is a central product of two of its subgroups M and N, then $F[M]\otimes _F F[N]\cong F[G]$. Also, if G is locally nilpotent, then G is a central product of subgroups $H_i$, where $[F[H_i]:F]=p_i^{2\alpha _i}$, $A=F[G]\cong F[H_1]\otimes _F \cdots \otimes _F F[H_k]$ and $H_i/Z(G)$ is the Sylow $p_i$-subgroup of $G/Z(G)$ for each i with $1\leq i\leq k$. Additionally, there is an element of order $p_i$ in F for each i with $1\leq i\leq k$.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Australian Mathematical Publishing Association Inc.

1 Introduction

The multiplicative group of a noncommutative division ring has been investigated in various papers by Amitsur [Reference Amitsur3], Herstein [Reference Herstein13, Reference Herstein14], Hua [Reference Hua15, Reference Hua16], Huzurbazar [Reference Huzurbazar17] and Scott [Reference Scott23, Reference Scott24]. Given a noncommutative division ring D with centre $Z(D) = F$ , the structure of the skew linear group $\mathrm {GL}_n(D)$ for $n \geq 1$ is generally unknown. A good account of the most important results concerning skew linear groups can be found in [Reference Shirvani and Wehrfritz25], as well as in [Reference Suprunenko26] particularly for linear groups. For instance, it is shown in [Reference Hazrat and Wadsworth12] that there is a close connection between the question of the existence of maximal subgroups in the multiplicative group of a finite-dimensional division algebra and Albert’s conjecture concerning the cyclicity of division algebras of prime degree. In this direction, in [Reference Mahdavi-Hezavehi and Tignol20], it is shown that when D is a central division F-algebra of prime degree p, then D is cyclic if and only if $D^*$ contains a nonabelian soluble subgroup. Furthermore, a theorem of Albert (see [Reference Draxl6, page 87]) asserts that D is cyclic if $D^*/F^*$ contains an element of order p.

The structure of locally nilpotent subgroups of $\mathrm {GL}_n(D)$ is studied in many papers. The basic structure of locally nilpotent skew linear groups over a locally finite-dimensional division algebra was studied by Zaleeskii [Reference Zaleeskii30]. One important problem raised by Zaleeskii remains open, namely, is every locally nilpotent subgroup of $\mathrm {GL}_n(D)$ hypercentral. In [Reference Garascuk10], Garascuk proved a theorem that shows this question has a positive answer in the case where $[D:F]< \infty $ . A treatment of such results which is both more elaborate and more refined may be found in [Reference Dixon4, Reference Shirvani and Wehrfritz25Reference Wehrfritz29]. For example, it is shown in [Reference Wehrfritz29] that when H is a locally nilpotent normal subgroup of the absolutely irreducible skew linear group G, then H is centre-by-locally-finite and $G/C_G(H)$ is periodic. In special cases, the structure of maximal subgroups of $\mathrm {GL}_n(D)$ has been investigated (see [Reference Akbari, Ebrahimian, Momenaee Kermani and Salehi Golsefidy1, Reference Akbari, Mahdavi-Hezavehi and Mahmudi2, Reference Dorbidi, Fallah-Moghaddam and Mahdavi-Hezavehi5, Reference Ebrahimian7, Reference Fallah-Moghaddam9]). For instance, it is shown in [Reference Akbari, Ebrahimian, Momenaee Kermani and Salehi Golsefidy1] that when D is a finite-dimensional division ring with infinite centre F and M is a locally nilpotent maximal subgroup of $\mathrm {GL}_n(D)$ , then M is an abelian group. Also, by [Reference Shirvani and Wehrfritz25, Theorem 3.3.8], when D is an F-central locally finite-dimensional division algebra, every locally nilpotent subgroup of $\mathrm {GL}_n(D)$ is soluble.

Another important property of locally nilpotent subgroups arises in crossed product constructions. Let R be a ring, S a subring of R and G a group of units of R normalising S such that $R=S[G]$ . Suppose that $N=S\cap G$ is a normal subgroup of G and $R=\oplus _{t \in T} tS$ , where T is some transversal of N to G. Set $H=G/N$ . We summarise this construction by saying that $(R, S, G, H)$ is a crossed product. Sometimes, we say that R is a crossed product of S by H. Let $\mathcal {O}$ be the class of all groups H such that every crossed product of a division ring by H is an Ore domain. In [Reference Shirvani and Wehrfritz25, Remark 1.4.4], it is shown that the group ring $EG$ is an Ore domain for any division ring E and any torsion-free locally nilpotent group G. In addition, any hyper torsion-free locally nilpotent group is in $\mathcal {O}$ .

Let D be an F-central division algebra and G a subgroup of $\mathrm {GL}_n(D)$ . The F-algebra of G, that is, the F-subalgebra generated by elements of G over F in $M_n(D)$ is denoted by $F[G]$ . Further, G is absolutely irreducible if $F[G]=M_n(D)$ . When $M_n(D)$ is a crossed product over a maximal subfield K, from [Reference Draxl6, page 92], $K/F$ is Galois and we can write $M_n(D)=\oplus _{\sigma \in \mathrm {Gal}(K/F)}Ke_{\sigma }$ , where $e_{\sigma }\in \mathrm {GL}_n(D)$ and for each $x\in K$ and $\sigma \in \mathrm {Gal}(K/F)$ , there exists $\sigma (x)\in K$ such that $e_{\sigma }x=\sigma (x)e_{\sigma }$ . Several recent papers investigate the group theoretical properties which give useful tools to realise maximal Galois subfields of central simple algebras in terms of absolutely irreducible subgroups (see [Reference Akbari, Ebrahimian, Momenaee Kermani and Salehi Golsefidy1, Reference Ebrahimian, Kiani and Mahdavi-Hezavehi8, Reference Fallah-Moghaddam9, Reference Hazrat, Mahdavi-Hezavehi and Motiee11, Reference Keshavarzipour and Mahdavi-Hezavehi18Reference Mahdavi-Hezavehi and Tignol20]).

We say a group G is a central product of two of its subgroups M and N if $G=MN$ and $M\subseteq C_G(N)$ . In fact, a central product of two groups is a quotient group of $M\times N$ . If F is a field and $FG$ denotes the group algebra of G, then it is well known that $FM\otimes _F FN\cong F(M\times N)$ . We prove a similar result for skew linear groups. Let A be an F-central simple algebra of degree $n^2=\prod _{i=1}^k p_i^{2\alpha _i}$ and G be a subgroup of the unit group of A such that $F[G]=A$ . We prove that if G is a central product of two of its subgroups M and N, then $F[M]\otimes _F F[N]\cong F[G]$ . Also, if G is locally nilpotent, then G is a central product of subgroups $H_i$ , where $[F[H_i]:F]=p_i^{2\alpha _i}$ , $A=F[G]\cong F[H_1]\otimes _F \cdots \otimes _F F[H_k]$ and $H_i/Z(G)$ is the Sylow $p_i$ -subgroup of $G/Z(G)$ for $1\leq i\leq k$ . Additionally, there is an element of order $p_i$ in F for $1\leq i\leq k$ .

2 Notation and conventions

We recall here some of the notation that we will need throughout this article. Given a subset S and a subring K of a ring R, the subring generated by K and S is denoted by $K[S].$ The unit group of R is written as $R^*$ . For a group G and subset $S\subset G$ , we denote by $Z(G)$ and $C_G(S)$ the centre and the centraliser of S in G and the same notation is applied for R. We use $N_G(S)$ for the normaliser of S in G and $G'$ for the derived subgroup of G. A group G is a central product of its subgroups $H_1,\ldots ,H_k$ if $G=H_1\cdots H_k$ and $H_i\subseteq C_G(H_j)$ for each $i\neq j$ .

Let F be a field, and A and B be two unital F-algebras. Let H be a subgroup of $A^*$ and G be a subgroup of $B^*$ . We define $H\otimes _F G$ by

$$ \begin{align*}H\otimes_F G=\{a\otimes b \mid a\in H, b\in G\}.\end{align*} $$

Note that $(a\otimes b)^{-1}=a^{-1}\otimes b^{-1}$ , so it is easily checked that $H\otimes _F G$ is a subgroup of $(A\otimes B)^*$ . Also, $F[H]\otimes _F F[G]=F[H\otimes _F G]$ in $A\otimes _F B$ .

Given a division ring D with centre F and a subgroup G of $\mathrm {GL}_n(D)$ , the space of column n-vectors $V=D^n$ over D is a $G\text {--}D$ bimodule; G is called irreducible, completely reducible or reducible according to whether V is irreducible, completely reducible or reducible as a $G\text {--}D$ bimodule.

An irreducible group G is said to be imprimitive if for some integer $m\geq 2,$ there exist subspaces $V_1,\ldots ,V_m$ of V such that $V=\oplus _{i=1}^m V_i$ and for any $g\in G$ , the mapping $V_i\rightarrow gV_i$ is a permutation of the set $\{V_1,\ldots ,V_m\}$ ; otherwise, G is called primitive.

The following important results on central simple algebras will be used later.

Theorem 2.1 (Double centraliser theorem; [Reference Draxl6, page 43]).

Let $B\subseteq A$ be simple rings such that $K:=Z(A)=Z(B)$ . Then, $A\cong B\otimes _K C_A(B)$ whenever $[B:K]$ is finite.

Theorem 2.2 (Centraliser theorem; [Reference Draxl6, page 42]).

Let B be a simple subring of a simple ring A, $ K:=Z(A)\subseteq Z(B)$ and $n:=[B:K]$ be finite. Then:

  1. (1) $C_A(B)\otimes _K M_n(K) \cong A \otimes _K B^{\mathrm {op}}$ ;

  2. (2) $C_A(B)$ is a simple ring;

  3. (3) $Z(C_A(B))=Z(B)$ ;

  4. (4) $C_A(C_A(B))=B$ ;

  5. (5) if $L:=Z(B)$ and $r:=[L:K]$ , then $A \otimes _K L \cong M_r(B) \otimes _L C_A(B) $ ;

  6. (6) A is a free left (right) $C_A(B)$ -module of unique rank n;

  7. (7) if, in addition to the above assumptions, $m:=[A:K]$ is also finite, then A is a free left (right) B-module of unique rank $m/n=[C_A(B):K]$ .

Theorem 2.3 [Reference Draxl6, page 30].

Let $A,B$ be K-algebras, $K:=Z(A)\subseteq Z(B)$ a field and either $[A:K]$ or $[B:K]$ finite. Then, $A\otimes _K B$ is a simple ring if and only if A and B are simple rings.

3 Central products of skew linear groups and tensor products of central simple algebras

In this section, we prove a theorem which relates a central decomposition of an absolutely irreducible group G to the tensor product decomposition of $F[G]$ .

It is well known that every finite dimensional division algebra is isomorphic to a tensor product of division algebras of prime power degree [Reference Draxl6, page 68]. Since each central simple algebra is isomorphic to some $M_n(D)$ , we easily obtain the following result.

Lemma 3.1. Let A be an F-central simple algebra of degree $m^2=\prod _{i=1}^k p_i^{2\alpha _i}$ . Then, $A\cong A_1\otimes _F\cdots \otimes _F A_k$ , where $A_i$ is a unique (up to isomorphism) F-central simple algebra of degree $p_i^{2\alpha _i}$ .

Additionally, we have the following easy lemma.

Lemma 3.2. Let $A,B$ be two F-central simple algebras, and $M\leq A^*$ and $N\leq B^*$ . Then, M and N are absolutely irreducible if and only if $M\otimes _F N$ is an absolutely irreducible subgroup of $A\otimes _F B$ .

Lemma 3.3. Let F be a field, $A,B$ be two unital F-algebras and $a\in A,b\in B$ . Then, $a\otimes b=1\otimes 1$ if and only if $a,b \in F$ and $ab=1$ .

Proof. First, if $a,b \in F$ and $ab=1$ , then $a\otimes b=ab\otimes 1=1\otimes 1$ .

Conversely, assume $a\otimes b=1\otimes 1$ . It is clear that $a\neq 0$ and $b\neq 0$ . First, assume that $a,b \notin F^*$ . Then, $\{1,a\}$ is an F-linearly independent set in A and $\{1,b\}$ is an F-linearly independent set in B. By [Reference Draxl6, Theorem 4.3], $\{a\otimes b,1\otimes 1\}$ is an F-linearly independent set in $A\otimes _F B$ . Therefore, $a\otimes b \neq 1\otimes 1$ . Next, assume that $a \notin F^*$ and $ b\in F^*$ . Then, $ab\notin F^*$ and $\{1,ab\}$ is an F-linearly independent set in B. Thus, $\{1\otimes ab,1\otimes 1\}$ is an F-linearly independent set in $A\otimes _F B$ and $a\otimes b=1\otimes ab\neq 1\otimes 1$ . When $b \notin F^*$ and $ a\in F^*$ , the proof is similar. We conclude that if $a\otimes b=1\otimes 1$ , then $a,b \in F^*$ . Now, we have $1\otimes 1=a\otimes b=ab\otimes 1=ab(1\otimes 1)$ . Consequently, $ab=1$ , as we desired.

The following result shows that any absolutely irreducible skew linear group can be viewed as an absolutely irreducible linear group.

Proposition 3.4. Let F be a field and D be a finite dimensional F-central division algebra such that $[D:F]=n^2$ . Let K be a maximal subfield of D and G be an absolutely irreducible subgroup of $\mathrm {GL}_m(D)$ . Then, $M_m(D)\otimes K\cong M_{mn}(K)$ and $G\otimes _F 1$ is an absolutely irreducible subgroup of $U(M_m(D)\otimes _F K)\cong \mathrm {GL}_{nm}(K)$ isomorphic to G.

Proof. By [Reference Pierce21, Propositions 13.5 and 13.3], there exists a maximal subfield K of D such that $[D:K]=[K:F]=n$ and $D\otimes _F K\cong M_n(K)$ . Therefore, $M_m(D)\otimes _F K\cong M_m(F)\otimes _F(D\otimes _F K)\cong (M_m(F)\otimes _F M_n(F))\otimes _F K \cong M_{mn}(K)$ . Now, by Lemma 3.3, the map $\phi : G\rightarrow G\otimes _F 1$ given by $\phi (g)=g\otimes 1$ is an isomorphism. However, G is an absolutely irreducible subgroup of $\mathrm {GL}_m(D)$ , so $F[G]=M_m(D)$ . Also, $M_m(D)\otimes _F K=F[G]\otimes _F K=K[G\otimes _F K^*]\subseteq K[G\otimes _F 1]\subseteq M_m(D)\otimes _F K$ . Consequently, $K[G\otimes _F 1]=M_m(D)\otimes _F K$ . This means $G\otimes _F 1$ is an absolutely irreducible subgroup of $\mathrm {GL}_m(D)\otimes _F K^*$ isomorphic to G. In addition, G is isomorphic to an absolutely irreducible subgroup of $\mathrm {GL}_{nm}(K)$ .

Corollary 3.5. Let F be a field and D be a finite dimensional F-central division algebra. Assume that G is a subgroup of $\mathrm {GL}_m(D)$ such that $F[G]$ is a simple ring. Then, there exists an absolutely irreducible linear group H isomorphic to G.

Theorem 3.6 [Reference Shirvani and Wehrfritz25, page 7].

Let F be a field, D a locally finite-dimensional division F-algebra and G a subgroup of $\mathrm {GL}_n(D)$ . Set $R=F[G]\subseteq M_n(D)$ .

  1. (1) If G is completely reducible, then R is semisimple Artinian.

  2. (2) If G is irreducible, then R is simple Artinian.

Using Theorem 3.6, we obtain the following result.

Corollary 3.7. Let F be a field and D be a finite dimensional F-central division algebra. If G is an irreducible subgroup of $\mathrm {GL}_m(D)$ , then there exists an absolutely irreducible linear group H isomorphic to G.

When F is a field, a subgroup G of $\mathrm {GL}_n(F)$ is said to be absolutely irreducible if it is an irreducible subgroup of $\mathrm {GL}_n(K)$ for any extension K of F. Hence, we obtain the following result.

Corollary 3.8. Let F be a field and D be a finite dimensional F-central division algebra. If G is an irreducible subgroup of $\mathrm {GL}_m(D)$ such that either G is irreducible or $F[G]$ is a simple ring, then there exists an algebraically closed field $\Omega $ and an irreducible $\Omega $ -linear group H isomorphic to G.

Theorem 3.9 [Reference Shirvani and Wehrfritz25, page 8].

Let F be a field, D a division F-algebra and G a subgroup of $\mathrm {GL}_n(D)$ . Set $R=F[G]\subseteq M_n(D)$ .

  1. (1) If R is semiprime (for example, if R is semisimple Artinian), then G is isomorphic to a completely reducible subgroup of $\mathrm {GL}_n(D)$ .

  2. (2) If R is simple Artinian, then for some $m\leq n$ , the group G is isomorphic to an irreducible subgroup of $\mathrm {GL}_m(D)$ .

Using Theorem 3.9, we obtain the following result.

Corollary 3.10. Let F be a field and D be a finite dimensional F-central division algebra such that $[D:F]=n^2$ . Let $A=M_m(D)\subseteq M_{n^2m}(F)=B$ be an F-central simple algebra. If G is a subgroup of $\mathrm {GL}_m(D)$ such that either G is irreducible or $F[G]$ is a simple ring, then for some $s\leq mn^2$ , the group G is isomorphic to an irreducible subgroup of $\mathrm {GL}_{s}(F)$ .

Theorem 3.11 [Reference Suprunenko26, page 111].

Let V be a finite dimensional linear space over a division ring D and G an irreducible subgroup of $\mathrm {GL}(V)$ which can be represented in the form $G=HF$ , where H and F are elementwise permutable normal subgroups of G. Then, the irreducible components of $H(F)$ are pairwise equivalent.

Proposition 3.12. Let F be a field and D be a finite dimensional F-central division algebra. Assume that G is an absolutely irreducible subgroup of $\mathrm {GL}_n(D)$ . If $G=MN$ is a central product decomposition of G, then $F[M]\otimes _F F[N]\cong F[G]$ and under this isomorphism, $M\otimes _F N\cong G$ . Additionally, $F[M]$ and $F[N]$ are F-central division algebras.

Proof. By [Reference Shirvani and Wehrfritz25, Theorem 1.2.1], G is irreducible. Using [Reference Shirvani and Wehrfritz25, Theorem 1.1.7] and Theorem 3.11, we conclude that M is a homogeneous completely irreducible subgroup. So Theorem 3.11 implies $D^n\cong V^m$ , where V is an irreducible $M-D$ bimodule. Hence, $F[N]\subseteq A=C_{M_n(D)}(M)=\mathrm {End}_{M-D}(D^n)\cong M_m(E)$ , where $E=\mathrm {End}_{M-D}(V)$ is a division ring by Schur’s lemma. Note that $F[N]\otimes F[M]\leq A\otimes _F C_{M_n(D)}(A)$ . Hence, by the centraliser theorem, $[F[M]:F]FN]:F]\leq [A:F][C_{M_n(D)}(A):F]=n^2[D:F]$ . Furthermore, $F[M],F[N]\subseteq F[G]$ implies that there is a surjective homomorphism f from $F[N]\otimes _F F[M]$ onto $F[G]{\kern-1pt}={\kern-1pt}M_n(D)$ such that $f(a\otimes b){\kern-1pt}={\kern-1pt}ab$ for each $a{\kern-1pt}\in{\kern-1pt} M,b{\kern-1pt}\in{\kern-1pt} N$ . So $F[M]\otimes _F F[N]\cong F[G]$ by dimension counting. It is clear that $\overline {f}$ , the restriction of f to $M\otimes _F N$ , is a surjective homomorphism on G. If $\overline {f}(a\otimes b)=ab=1$ , then $a=b^{-1}\in M\cap N\subseteq Z(G)\subseteq F$ . Hence, $a\otimes b=b^{-1}\otimes b=1\otimes b^{-1}b=1\otimes 1$ . So, $\ker (\overline {f})$ is trivial and $\overline {f}$ is an isomorphism from $M\otimes _F N$ to G. Consequently, $F[M]$ and $F[N]$ are F-central division algebras by Theorem 2.3.

The following example shows that the above result is not true in semisimple rings.

Example 3.13. Let $A=F\times F$ , $G=\{(1,1),(1,-1),(-1,1),(-1,-1)\}$ , $M=\{(1,1), (1,-1)\},N=\{(1,1),(-1,1)\}$ . Then, G is a central product of M and N. However, $ [F[M]\otimes _F F[N]:F]=4$ . So $F[M]\otimes _F F[N]\ncong F[G]=A$ .

Next we introduce some notation from [Reference Suprunenko26]. Let V be a finite dimensional linear space over a division ring D and G a completely irreducible subgroup of $\mathrm {GL}(V)$ . Let $D^n=V=L_1\oplus \cdots \oplus L_r $ and suppose that $L_i$ is a G-invariant G-irreducible subspace of V for $1\leq i\leq r$ . We determine the irreducible components of G, that is, the irreducible representations $d_i$ of the form

$$ \begin{align*}d_i:G\rightarrow \text{GL}(L_i), \quad g\rightarrow g\mid L_i, \quad i=1, \ldots, r.\end{align*} $$

By [Reference Suprunenko26, Lemma 13.1], the irreducible components $d_i$ and $d_j$ of G are equivalent if and only if there exists a module isomorphism $\Psi : L_i\rightarrow L_j$ such that for any $y \in G$ ,

$$ \begin{align*}d_j(y)=\Psi d_1(y)\Psi^{-1}.\end{align*} $$

In addition, these representations are equivalent if and only if the modules $L_i$ and $L_j$ have respective bases $B_1 $ and $B_2$ such that for any $y\in G$ , the matrix of the endomorphism $d_i(y)$ in $B_1$ is the same as that of $d_j(y)$ in $B_2$ . This observation gives the following result.

Lemma 3.14. Let G be a completely irreducible subgroup of $\mathrm {GL}_n(D)$ such that the irreducible components of G are pairwise equivalent. Let r be the degree of an irreducible component of G and $n=rs$ . Then, there is an isomorphism f with $f:M_n(D)\longrightarrow M_r(D)\otimes _F M_s(F)$ and an irreducible subgroup H of $\mathrm {GL}_r(D)$ such that $f(G)=H\otimes \{1\}$ .

4 Locally nilpotent subgroups of $\textrm {GL}_n(D)$

In this section, we prove that every absolutely irreducible locally nilpotent subgroup of $\mathrm {GL}_n(D)$ is a central product of some of its subgroups which gives a decomposition of $M_n(D)$ as a tensor product of central simple algebras of prime power degree. First, we recall the following general results which play a key role in proving our main theorems.

Theorem 4.1 [Reference Suprunenko26, page 216].

Let F be an arbitrary field and G be an absolutely irreducible locally nilpotent subgroup of $\mathrm {GL}_n(F)$ . Then, $G/Z(G) $ is periodic and $\pi (G/Z(G))=\pi (n)$ .

Theorem 4.2 [Reference Wehrfritz29].

Let H be a locally nilpotent normal subgroup of the absolutely irreducible skew linear group G. Then, H is centre-by-locally finite and $G/C_G(H)$ is periodic.

Theorem 4.3 [Reference Robinson22, page 342].

Let G be a locally nilpotent group. Then, the elements of finite order in G form a fully invariant subgroup T (the torsion subgroup of G) such that $G/T$ is torsion and T is a direct product of p-groups.

Theorem 4.4 [Reference Dorbidi, Fallah-Moghaddam and Mahdavi-Hezavehi5].

Let N be a normal subgroup in a primitive subgroup M of $\mathrm {GL}_n(D)$ . Then:

  1. (1) $F[N]$ is a prime ring;

  2. (2) $C_{M_n(D)}(N)$ is a simple Artinian ring;

  3. (3) if $C_{M_n(D)}(N)$ is a division ring, then N is irreducible.

Theorem 4.5 [Reference Keshavarzipour and Mahdavi-Hezavehi18].

Let D be a finite dimensional F-central division algebra. Then, $M_m(D)$ is a crossed product over a maximal subfield if and only if there exists an absolutely irreducible subgroup G of $M_m(D)$ and a normal abelian subgroup A of G such that $C_G(A)=A$ and $F[A]$ contains no zero divisor.

Theorem 4.6. Let $A=M_n(D)$ be an F-central simple algebra of degree $m^2=\prod _{i=1}^k p_i^{2\alpha _i}$ and G be an absolutely irreducible locally nilpotent subgroup $A^*$ . Then:

  1. (1) $G/Z(G) $ is locally finite and $\pi (G/Z(G))=\pi (m)$ ;

  2. (2) $G/Z(G) $ is a p-group for some prime p if and only if m is a pth power.

Proof. (1) By Theorem 4.2, G is centre-by-locally finite. Let K be a maximal subfield of D. By Proposition 3.4, G is isomorphic to an absolutely irreducible subgroup of $\mathrm {GL}_{m}(K)$ . Now, Theorem 4.1 asserts that $\pi (G/Z(G))=\pi (m)$ .

(2) This statement is clear from item (1).

Corollary 4.7. Let $A=M_n(D)$ be an F-central simple algebra of degree $m^2=\prod _{i=1}^k p_i^{2\alpha _i}$ and G be an absolutely irreducible locally nilpotent subgroup of $A^*$ . Then:

  1. (1) $G/Z(G) $ is locally finite and $\pi (G/Z(G))=\pi (m^2/[C_{M_n(D)}:F])\subseteq \pi (m)$ ;

  2. (2) if $G/Z(G) $ is a p-group for some prime p, then $[F[G]:F]$ is a pth power;

  3. (3) if m is a pth power for some prime p, then $G/Z(G) $ is a p-group.

Proof. By Theorem 3.6, $F[G]$ is a simple ring. From the centraliser theorem, $[F[G]:F][C_{M_n(D)}:F]=m^2$ . The reminder of the proof is similar to the proof of Theorem 4.6.

Now we are ready to prove the main theorem of this article.

Theorem 4.8. Let $A=M_n(D)$ be an F-central simple algebra of degree $m^2=\prod _{i=1}^k p_i^{2\alpha _i}$ and G be an absolutely irreducible locally nilpotent subgroup $A^*$ . Then:

  1. (1) $G/Z(G)$ is the internal direct product of ${H_1}/{Z(G)},\ldots , {H_k}/{Z(G)}$ , where $H_i/Z(G)$ is the Sylow $p_i$ -subgroup of $G/Z(G)$ ;

  2. (2) G is the central product of $H_1,\ldots ,H_k$ ;

  3. (3) $A=F[G]\cong F[H_1]\otimes _F \cdots \otimes _F F[H_k]$ and $G\cong H_1\otimes _F \cdots \otimes _F H_k $ under this isomorphism and, for each i, $A_i=F[H_i]$ is an F-central simple algebra and $[F[H_i]:F]={p_i}^{2\alpha _i}$ .

Proof. (1) The statement follows from Theorems 4.3 and 4.6.

(2) Let $i \neq j$ and take $a \in H_i,b \in H_j$ . Then, $ab=\lambda ba$ with $\lambda \in Z(G) \subseteq F^*$ . Now, $a^{{p_i}^\gamma } \in F^*$ and $b^{{p_j}^\delta }\in F^*$ , so $\lambda ^{{p_i}^\gamma }=\lambda ^{{p_j}^\delta }=1$ , which gives $\lambda =1$ and $ab=ba$ . So, $H_i\subseteq C_G(H_j)$ and G is the central product of $H_1,\ldots ,H_k$ .

(3) This statement follows from Proposition 3.12 and induction on k.

Corollary 4.9. Keep the notation and assumptions of Theorem 4.8. If $n=1$ and $F[H_i]=D_i$ , then $D\cong D_1\otimes _F \cdots \otimes _F D_k$ , where $i(D_i)={p_i}^{\alpha _i}$ .

Using [Reference Kiani and Ramezan-Nassab19, Theorem 2.4], we have the following proposition.

Proposition 4.10. Keep the notation and assumptions of Theorem 4.8. Then, $F[G]=M_n(D)$ is a crossed product over a maximal subfield K if and only if for each i, $F[H_i]$ is a crossed product over a maximal subfield $K_i$ . In addition, under these circumstances, $K\cong K_1 \otimes _F\cdots \otimes _F K_k$ and $\mathrm {Gal}(K/F)\cong \mathrm {Gal}(K_1/F)\times \cdots \times \mathrm {Gal}(K_k/F). $

Theorem 4.11. Let D be an F-central finite dimensional division algebra. Assume that G be a primitive absolutely irreducible locally nilpotent subgroup of $\mathrm {GL}_n(D)$ . Then, $M_n(D)$ is a crossed product over a maximal subfield K. With the notation and assumptions of Theorem 4.8:

  1. (1) there exists an abelian normal subgroup S of G such that $G/S$ and $\mathrm {Gal}(K/F)$ are finite nilpotent groups and $\mathrm {Gal}(K/F)\cong N_{\mathrm {GL}_n(D)}(K^*)/K^*\cong G/S$ ;

  2. (2) for each i, there exists an abelian subgroup $A_i$ of $H_i$ such that $F[H_i]$ is a crossed product over a maximal subfield $K_i$ and, in addition, $H_i/A_i$ and $Gal(K_i/F)$ are finite nilpotent groups and $\mathrm {Gal}(K_i/F)\cong N_{F[H_i]^*}(K_i^*)/K_i^*\cong H_i/A_i$ ;

  3. (3) $S\cong A_1\otimes _F \cdots \otimes _F A_k $ , $K\cong K_1\otimes _F \cdots \otimes _F K_k $ and $S=A_1 \cdots A_k $ .

Proof. By [Reference Shirvani and Wehrfritz25, Theorem 3.3.8], G is soluble. Now, using [Reference Suprunenko26, Theorem 6, page 135], G contains a maximal abelian normal subgroup, say S, such that $|G/S|< \infty $ . By Theorem 4.4, $K=F[S]$ is a field and by a result in [Reference Garascuk10], G is hypercentral. Hence, by an exercise from [Reference Robinson22, page 354], we conclude that every maximal abelian normal subgroup of G is self-centralising. Now, using Theorem 4.5, we conclude that $M_n(D)$ is a crossed product over a maximal subfield K. By a result of [Reference Draxl6, page 92], $K/F$ is Galois and we can write $M_n(D)=\oplus _{\sigma \in \mathrm {Gal}(K/F)}Ke_{\sigma }$ , where $e_{\sigma }\in \mathrm {GL}_n(D)$ and for each $x\in K$ and $\sigma \in \mathrm {Gal}(K/F)$ , there exists $\sigma (x)\in K$ such that $e_{\sigma }x=\sigma (x)e_{\sigma }$ . So, $e_{\sigma }\in N_{\mathrm {GL}_n(D)}(K^*)$ . Now, using the Skolem–Noether theorem [Reference Draxl6, page 39] and the fact that $C_{M_n(D)}(K)=K$ , we obtain $\mathrm {Gal}(K/F)\cong N_{\mathrm {GL}_n(D)}(K^*)/K^*$ . However, consider the homomorphism $\sigma : G\rightarrow \mathrm {Gal}(K/F)$ given by $\sigma (x)=f_x$ , where $f_x(k)=xkx^{-1}$ for $k\in K$ . Clearly, $\ker (\sigma )=C_G(K)$ . Since $S\subseteq C_G(K)\subseteq C_G(S)=S$ , we have $C_G(K)=S$ . Choose an element $a \in \mathrm {Fix}(\mathrm {Im}\, \sigma )$ . For any $x\in G$ , we have $f_x(a)=a$ and hence $xa=ax$ . This shows that $\mathrm {Fix}(\mathrm {Im}\, \sigma )\subseteq C_K(G)\subseteq C_{M_n(D)}(G)=F$ . Hence, $F=\mathrm {Fix}(\mathrm {Im}\, \sigma )$ and $\sigma $ is surjective. Therefore, $\mathrm {Gal}(K/F)\cong G/S$ , as we claimed.

The proof is completed by using Theorem 4.8 and Proposition 4.10.

We can immediately deduce the following theorem.

Theorem 4.12. Let D be an F-central finite dimensional division algebra such that $[D:F]=i(D)^2=\prod _{i=1}^k{p_i}^{2\alpha _i}$ . If $D^*$ contains an absolutely irreducible locally nilpotent subgroup G, then D is a crossed product over a maximal subfield K. With the notation and assumptions of Theorems 4.8 and 4.11, $D\cong D_1\otimes _F \cdots \otimes _F D_k$ , where $F[H_i]=D_i$ and $D_i$ is a crossed product over a maximal subfield $K_i$ .

Proposition 4.13. Let $A=M_n(D)$ be an F-central simple algebra of degree $m^2=\prod _{i=1}^k p_i^{2\alpha _i}$ and G be an absolutely irreducible locally nilpotent subgroup $A^*$ . Then, there is an element of order $p_i$ in F for $1\leq i\leq k$ .

Proof. Keep the notation and assumptions of Theorem 4.8, so that $[F[H_i]:F]={p_i}^{2\alpha _i}$ . Since $F[H_i]$ is a central simple algebra, $F[H_i]\cong M_{{p_i}^{\beta _i}}(D_i)$ , where $D_i$ is an F-central division algebra of degree a power of $p_i$ . Assume that $K_i$ is a maximal subfield of $D_i$ . By [Reference Suprunenko26, Theorem 27.6] and Proposition 3.4, $K_i$ contains an element b, say, of order $p_i$ . Now, $[F(b):F]\leq p_i-1$ and $[F(b):F]\mid [K_i:F]$ . However, $[K_i:F]$ is a power of $p_i$ , which implies $[F[b]:F]=1$ , that is, $b\in F$ .

Proposition 4.14. Let D be an F-central finite dimensional division algebra and suppose that for $p \in \pi (n)$ , there is an element of order p in F, when $n>1$ . Then, $\mathrm {GL}_n(D)$ contains a finite irreducible nonabelian nilpotent subgroup G such that $F[G]=M_n(F)\subseteq M_n(D)$ .

Proof. By [Reference Suprunenko26, Theorem 27.6], there exists a finite nilpotent subgroup G of $\mathrm {GL}_n(F)$ such that $F[G]=M_n(F)\subseteq M_n(D)$ . We show that G is an irreducible subgroup of $\mathrm {GL}_n(D)$ . In contrast, assume that G is reducible in $\mathrm {GL}_n(D)$ . By [Reference Shirvani and Wehrfritz25, Theorem 1.1.1], there exists a matrix $P \in \mathrm {GL}_n(D)$ such that

$$ \begin{align*}P(F[G])P^{-1}\subseteq\left[\begin{matrix} M_r(D) & B \\ 0_{(n-s)\times r} & M_{n-s}(D)\\ \end{matrix}\right].\end{align*} $$

This means that we can define a homomorphism from $M_n(F)$ to $M_r(D)$ . However, $M_n(F)$ is a simple ring. Hence, this map is an injection. This contradicts [Reference Shirvani and Wehrfritz25, Theorem 1.1.9], which asserts that the matrix ring $M_r(D)$ contains at most r nonzero pairwise orthogonal idempotents.

Example 4.15. The multiplicative group of the real quaternion division algebra contains the quaternion group which is an absolutely irreducible $2$ -group. By [Reference Ebrahimian, Kiani and Mahdavi-Hezavehi8, Corollary 3.5], if D is a noncommutative finite dimensional F-central division algebra and $D^*$ contains an absolutely irreducible finite p-subgroup for some prime p, then D is a nilpotent crossed product with $[D : F] = 2^m$ for some $m \in \mathbb {N}$ .

Acknowledgements

The first author thanks the Research Council of the Farhangian University for support. The second author is indebted to the Research Council of University of Jiroft for support.

References

Akbari, S., Ebrahimian, R., Momenaee Kermani, H. and Salehi Golsefidy, A., ‘Maximal subgroups of ${GL}_n(D)$ ’, J. Algebra 259 (2003), 201225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Akbari, S., Mahdavi-Hezavehi, M. and Mahmudi, M. G., ‘Maximal subgroups of ${GL}_1(D)$ ’, J. Algebra 217 (1999), 422433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amitsur, S. A., ‘Finite subgroups of division rings’, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 80 (1955), 361386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dixon, J. D., The Structure of Linear Groups, Van Nostrand Reinhold Mathematical Studies, 37 (John Wiley and Sons, Hoboken, NJ, 1971).Google Scholar
Dorbidi, H., Fallah-Moghaddam, R. and Mahdavi-Hezavehi, M., ‘Soluble maximal subgroups of ${GL}_n(D)$ ’, J. Algebra Appl. 9(6) (2010), 921932.Google Scholar
Draxl, P. K., Skew Fields (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1983).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ebrahimian, R., ‘Nilpotent maximal subgroups of ${GL}_n(D)$ ’, J. Algebra 280 (2004), 244248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ebrahimian, R., Kiani, D. and Mahdavi-Hezavehi, M., ‘Supersoluble crossed product criterion for division algebras’, Israel J. Math. 145 (2005), 325331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fallah-Moghaddam, R., ‘Maximal subgroups of ${SL}_n(D)$ ’, J. Algebra 531 (2019), 7082.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garascuk, M. S., ‘On the theory of the generalized nilpotent linear groups’, Dokl. Akad. Nauk BSSR 4 (1960), 276277.Google Scholar
Hazrat, R., Mahdavi-Hezavehi, M. and Motiee, M., ‘Multiplicative groups of division rings’, Math. Proc. R. Ir. Acad. 114(1) (2014), 37114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hazrat, R. and Wadsworth, A. R., ‘On maximal subgroups of the multiplicative group of a division algebra’, J. Algebra 322 (2009), 25282543.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herstein, I. N., ‘Finite multiplicative subgroups in division rings’, Pacific J. Math. 3 (1953), 121126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herstein, I. N., ‘Multiplicative commutators in division rings’, Israel J. Math. 31(2) (1978), 180188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hua, L. K., ‘Some properties of a field’, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 35 (1949), 533537.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hua, L. K., ‘On the multiplicative group of a field’, Sci. Rec. Acad. Sin. 3 (1950), 16.Google Scholar
Huzurbazar, M. S., ‘The multiplicative group of a division ring’, Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR 131 (1960), 12681271; English translation Soviet Math. Dokl. 1 (1960), 433–435.Google Scholar
Keshavarzipour, T. and Mahdavi-Hezavehi, M., ‘Crossed product conditions for central simple algebras in terms of irreducible subgroups’, J. Algebra 315(2) (2007), 738744.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kiani, D. and Ramezan-Nassab, M., ‘Crossed product conditions for central simple algebras in terms of splitting fields’, Int. Math. Forum 4(32) (2009), 15871590.Google Scholar
Mahdavi-Hezavehi, M. and Tignol, J.-P., ‘Cyclicity conditions for division algebras of prime degree’, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 131(12) (2003), 36733676.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pierce, R. S., Associative Algebras, Graduate Texts in Mathematics, 88 (Springer, New York, 1986).Google Scholar
Robinson, D. J. S., A Course in the Theory Groups, Graduate Texts in Mathematics, 80 (Springer, New York, 1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scott, W. R., ‘On the multiplicative group of a division ring’, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 8 (1957), 303305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scott, W. R., Group Theory (Dover, New York, 1987).Google Scholar
Shirvani, M. and Wehrfritz, B. A. F., Skew Linear Groups, London Mathematical Society Lecture Note Series, 118 (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1986).Google Scholar
Suprunenko, D. A., Matrix Groups (American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 1976).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wehrfritz, B. A. F., Infinite Linear Groups, Ergebnisse der Mathematik und ihrer Grenzgebiete, 76 (Springer-Verlag, Berlin–Heidelberg–New York, 1973).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wehrfritz, B. A. F., ‘Locally nilpotent skew linear groups’, Proc. Edinb. Math. Soc. (2) 29 (1986), 101113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wehrfritz, B. A. F., ‘Locally nilpotent skew linear groups II’, Proc. Edinb. Math. Soc. (2) 30 (1987), 423426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zaleeskii, A. E., ‘The structure of several classes of matrix groups over a division ring’, Sibirsk. Mat. Zh. 8 (1967), 12841298 (in Russian).Google Scholar