Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T09:35:00.209Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

LIFTING DERIVATIONS AND n-WEAK AMENABILITY OF THE SECOND DUAL OF A BANACH ALGEBRA

Part of: Topological algebras, normed rings and algebras, Banach algebras

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 November 2010

S. BAROOTKOOB  and
H. R. EBRAHIMI VISHKI
S. BAROOTKOOB
Affiliation:
Department of Pure Mathematics, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, PO Box 1159, Mashhad 91775, Iran (email: [email protected])
H. R. EBRAHIMI VISHKI*
Affiliation:
Department of Pure Mathematics and Centre of Excellence in Analysis on Algebraic Structures (CEAAS), Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, PO Box 1159, Mashhad 91775, Iran (email: [email protected])
*
✉For correspondence; e-mail: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

We show that for n≥2, n-weak amenability of the second dual 𝒜** of a Banach algebra 𝒜 implies that of 𝒜. We also provide a positive answer for the case n=1, which sharpens some older results. Our method of proof also provides a unified approach to give short proofs for some known results in the case where n=1.

Keywords

weak amenabilityn-weak amenabilityderivationsecond dualArens product

MSC classification

Secondary: 46H20: Structure, classification of topological algebras
Type
Research Article
Information
Bulletin of the Australian Mathematical Society , Volume 83 , Issue 1 , February 2011 , pp. 122 - 129
Copyright
Copyright © Australian Mathematical Publishing Association Inc. 2010

Footnotes

This research was supported by a grant from Ferdowsi University of Mashhad (No. MP88107VIS).

References

[1]Arens, A., ‘The adjoint of a bilinear operation’, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 2 (1951), 839–848.Google Scholar
[2]Bade, W. G., Curtis, P. C. and Dales, H. G., ‘Amenability and weak amenability for Beurling and Lipschitz algebras’, Proc. London Math. Soc. 55 (1987), 359–377.Google Scholar
[3]Dales, H. G., Ghahramani, F. and Grønbæk, N., ‘Derivations into iterated duals of Banach algebras’, Studia Math. 128(1) (1998), 19–54.Google Scholar
[4]Dales, H. G., Rodrigues-Palacios, A. and Velasco, M. V., ‘The second transpose of a derivation’, J. London Math. Soc. 64(2) (2001), 707–721.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[5]Eshaghi Gordji, M. and Filali, M., ‘Weak amenability of the second dual of a Banach algebra’, Studia Math. 182(3) (2007), 205–213.Google Scholar
[6]Ghahramani, F. and Laali, J., ‘Amenability and topological centres of the second duals of Banach algebras’, Bull. Aust. Math. Soc. 65 (2002), 191–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[7]Ghahramani, F., Loy, R. J. and Willis, G. A., ‘Amenability and weak amenability of the second conjugate Banach algebras’, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 124 (1996), 1489–1497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[8]Jabbari, A., Moslehian, M. S. and Vishki, H. R. E., ‘Constructions preserving n-weak amenability of Banach algebras’, Math. Bohem. 134(4) (2009), 349–357.Google Scholar
[9]Johnson, B. E., ‘Weak amenability of group algebras’, Bull. London Math. Soc. 23 (1991), 281–284.Google Scholar
[10]Mohammadzadeh, S. and Vishki, H. R. E., ‘Arens regularity of module actions and the second adjoint of a derivation’, Bull. Aust. Math. Soc. 77 (2008), 465–476.Google Scholar