Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T21:51:52.940Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Equationally complete varieties of generalized groups

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 April 2009

W.F. Page
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, University of Miami, Coral Gables, Florida, USA.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

In previous work, Page and Butson [Algebra Universalis 3 (1973), 112–126] characterized all equationally complete classes (atoms) of m–semigroups (universal algebras with one m–ary associative operation), and hence m–groups, in the commutative case. The further characterization of the non-commutative m-group atoms was thought to hinge upon a conjecture by Page [PhD thesis, University of Miami, 1973] that a weaker form of commutativity held true. In this paper that conjecture is proved and then used to study the special case m = 4. Two additional infinite sets of atoms are thereby determined, although it is not proved that these examples exhaust the remaining atoms for m = 4.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Australian Mathematical Society 1975

References

[1]Borevich, Z.I. and Shafarevich, I.R., Number theory (translated by Greenleaf, Newcomb. Pure and Applied Mathematics, 20. Academic Press, New York and London, 1966).Google Scholar
[2]Dörnte, Wilhelm, “Untersuchungen über einen verallgemeinerten Gruppenbegriff”, Math. Z. 29 (1929), 119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[3]Monk, J.D. and Sioson, F.M., “On the general theory of m–groups”, Fund. Math. 72 (1971), 233244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[4]Page, William Frank, “On the lattice of equational classes of m–semigroups”, (PhD thesis, University of Miami, Coral Gables, 1973).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[5]Page, W.F. and Butson, A.T., “The lattice of equational classes of m–semigroups”, Algebra Universalis 3 (1973), 112126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[6]Post, Emil L., “Polyadic groups”, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 48 (1940), 208350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar