Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T13:28:55.109Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

AN IMPROVED RESULT ON GROUND STATE SOLUTIONS OF QUASILINEAR SCHRÖDINGER EQUATIONS WITH SUPER-LINEAR NONLINEARITIES

Part of: Elliptic equations and systems Equations of mathematical physics and other areas of application

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 December 2018

SITONG CHEN Open the ORCID record for SITONG CHEN [Opens in a new window]  and
ZU GAO
SITONG CHEN*
Affiliation:
School of Mathematics and Statistics, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan 410083, PR China email [email protected]
ZU GAO
Affiliation:
School of Mathematics and Statistics, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan 410083, PR China email [email protected]
*
✉[email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

By using variational and some new analytic techniques, we prove the existence of ground state solutions for the quasilinear Schrödinger equation with variable potentials and super-linear nonlinearities. Moreover, we establish a minimax characterisation of the ground state energy. Our result improves and extends the existing results in the literature.

Keywords

quasilinear Schrödinger equationground state solutionPohoz̆aev identity

MSC classification

Primary: 35J20: Variational methods for second-order elliptic equations
Secondary: 35Q55: NLS-like equations (nonlinear Schrödinger)
Type
Research Article
Information
Bulletin of the Australian Mathematical Society , Volume 99 , Issue 2 , April 2019 , pp. 231 - 241
Copyright
© 2018 Australian Mathematical Publishing Association Inc. 

Footnotes

This work is partially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (11571370, 11701487 and 11626202) and Hunan Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China (2016JJ6137).

References

Brizhik, L., Eremko, A., Piette, B. and Zakrzewski, W. J., ‘Electron self-trapping in a discrete two-dimensional lattice’, Physica D 159 (2001), 71–90.Google Scholar
Chen, J., Tang, X. H. and Chen, S. T., ‘Existence of ground states for fractional Kirchhoff equations with general potentials via Nehari–Pohozaev manifold’, Electron. J. Differential Equations 2018 (2018), Article ID 142, 21 pages.Google Scholar
Chen, S. T. and Tang, X. H., ‘Existence of ground state solutions for quasilinear Schrödinger equations with variable potentials and almost necessary nonlinearities’, Electron. J. Differential Equations 2018 (2018), Article ID 157, 13 pages.Google Scholar
Chen, S. T. and Tang, X. H., ‘Ground state solutions for generalized Schrödinger equations with variable potentials and Berestycki–Lions nonlinearities’, J. Math. Phys. 59 (2018), Article ID 081508.Google Scholar
Chen, S. T. and Tang, X. H., ‘Improved results for Klein–Gordon–Maxwell systems with general nonlinearity’, Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst. 38 (2018), 2333–2348.Google Scholar
Colin, M. and Jeanjean, L., ‘Solutions for a quasilinear Schrödinger equation: a dual approach’, Nonlinear Anal. 56 (2004), 213–226.Google Scholar
Hartmann, H. and Zakrzewski, W. J., ‘Electrons on hexagonal lattices and applications to nanotubes’, Phys. Rev. B 68 184302 (2003).Google Scholar
Jeanjean, L., ‘On the existence of bounded Palais–Smale sequences and application to a Landesman–Lazer-type problem set on ℝ N ’, Proc. Roy. Soc. Edinburgh Sect. A 129 (1999), 787–809.Google Scholar
Liu, J. Q., Wang, Y. Q. and Wang, Z. Q., ‘Soliton solutions for quasilinear Schrödinger equations, II’, J. Differential Equations 187 (2003), 473–493.Google Scholar
Liu, J. Q., Wang, Y. Q. and Wang, Z. Q., ‘Solutions for quasilinear Schrödinger equations via the Nehari method’, Comm. Partial Differential Equations 29 (2004), 879–901.Google Scholar
Poppenberg, M., ‘On the local well posedness of quasilinear Schrödinger equations in arbitrary space dimension’, J. Differential Equations 172 (2001), 83–115.Google Scholar
Ruiz, D. and Siciliano, G., ‘Existence of ground states for a modified nonlinear Schrödinger equation’, Nonlinearity 23 (2010), 1221–1233.Google Scholar
Tang, X. H. and Chen, S. T., ‘Ground state solutions of Nehari–Pohoz̆aev type for Kirchhoff-type problems with general potentials’, Calc. Var. Partial Differential Equations 56 (2017), Article ID 110, 25 pages.Google Scholar
Tang, X. H. and Chen, S. T., ‘Ground state solutions of Nehari–Pohoz̆aev type for Schrödinger–Poisson problems with general potentials’, Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst. 37 (2017), 4973–5002.Google Scholar
Tang, X. H., Lin, X. Y. and Yu, J. S., ‘Nontrivial solutions for Schrödinger equation with local super-quadratic conditions’, J. Dynam. Differential Equations 2018 (2018), 15 pages, available online at https://doi.org/10.1007/s10884–018–9662–2.Google Scholar
Willem, M., Minimax Theorems, Progress in Nonlinear Differential Equations and their Applications, 24 (Birkhäuser, Boston, MA, 1996).Google Scholar
Wu, K. and Wu, X., ‘Radial solutions for quasilinear Schrödinger equations without 4-superlinear condition’, Appl. Math. Lett. 76 (2018), 53–59.Google Scholar
Yang, M. B., ‘Existence of solutions for a quasilinear Schrödinger equation with subcritical nonlinearities’, Nonlinear Anal. 74 (2012), 5362–5373.Google Scholar
Zhang, J., Tang, X. H. and Zhang, W., ‘Ground state solutions for a quasilinear Schrödinger equation’, Mediterr. J. Math. 14 (2017), Article ID 84, 13 pages.Google Scholar