Hostname: page-component-f554764f5-nwwvg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-21T08:47:24.439Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

ISOMORPHISM OF RELATIVE HOLOMORPHS AND MATRIX SIMILARITY

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 September 2024

VOLKER GEBHARDT
Affiliation:
Centre for Research in Mathematics and Data Science, Western Sydney University, Penrith, New South Wales 2751, Australia e-mail: [email protected]
ALBERTO J. HERNANDEZ ALVARADO
Affiliation:
CIMPA, Universidad de Costa Rica, San Pedro, San José, Costa Rica e-mail: [email protected]
FERNANDO SZECHTMAN*
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Regina, Regina, Saskatchewan S4S 0A2, Canada

Abstract

Let V be a finite dimensional vector space over the field with p elements, where p is a prime number. Given arbitrary $\alpha ,\beta \in \mathrm {GL}(V)$, we consider the semidirect products $V\rtimes \langle \alpha \rangle $ and $V\rtimes \langle \beta \rangle $, and show that if $V\rtimes \langle \alpha \rangle $ and $V\rtimes \langle \beta \rangle $ are isomorphic, then $\alpha $ must be similar to a power of $\beta $ that generates the same subgroup as $\beta $; that is, if H and K are cyclic subgroups of $\mathrm {GL}(V)$ such that $V\rtimes H\cong V\rtimes K$, then H and K must be conjugate subgroups of $\mathrm {GL}(V)$. If we remove the cyclic condition, there exist examples of nonisomorphic, let alone nonconjugate, subgroups H and K of $\mathrm {GL}(V)$ such that $V\rtimes H\cong V\rtimes K$. Even if we require that noncyclic subgroups H and K of $\mathrm {GL}(V)$ be abelian, we may still have $V\rtimes H\cong V\rtimes K$ with H and K nonconjugate in $\mathrm {GL}(V)$, but in this case, H and K must at least be isomorphic. If we replace V by a free module U over ${\mathbb {Z}}/p^m{\mathbb {Z}}$ of finite rank, with $m>1$, it may happen that $U\rtimes H\cong U\rtimes K$ for nonconjugate cyclic subgroups of $\mathrm {GL}(U)$. If we completely abandon our requirements on V, a sufficient criterion is given for a finite group G to admit nonconjugate cyclic subgroups H and K of $\mathrm {Aut}(G)$ such that $G\rtimes H\cong G\rtimes K$. This criterion is satisfied by many groups.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Australian Mathematical Publishing Association Inc.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

Footnotes

The third author was supported in part by an NSERC discovery grant.

References

Bekker, I. H., ‘The holomorphs of torsion-free abelian groups’, Izv. Vyssh. Uchebn. Zaved. Mat. 3 (1974), 311.Google Scholar
Burnside, W., Theory of Groups of Finite Order (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1897).Google Scholar
Caranti, A. and Dalla Volta, F., ‘Groups that have the same holomorph as a finite perfect group’, J. Algebra 507 (2018), 81102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clay, J. R., ‘Completeness of relative holomorphs of abelian groups’, Rocky Mountain J. Math. 10 (1980), 731741.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dark, R. S., ‘A complete group of odd order’, Math. Proc. Cambridge Philos. Soc. 77 (1975), 2128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hsu, N. C., ‘The holomorphs of free abelian groups of finite rank’, Amer. Math. Monthly 72 (1965), 754756.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kohl, T., ‘Groups of order $4p$ , twisted wreath products and Hopf–Galois theory’, J. Algebra 314 (2007), 7274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kohl, T., ‘Multiple holomorphs of dihedral and quaternionic groups’, Comm. Algebra 43 (2015), 42904304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuzennyi, N. F., ‘Isomorphism of semidirect products’, Ukrainian Math. J. 26 (1974), 543547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, G. A., ‘On the multiple holomorphs of a group’, Math. Ann. 66 (1908), 133142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mills, W. H., ‘Multiple holomorphs of finitely generated abelian groups’, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 71 (1951), 379392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mills, W. H., ‘On the non-isomorphism of certain holomorphs’, Trans. Am. Math. Soc. 74 (1953), 428443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peremans, W., ‘Completeness of holomorphs’, Nederl. Akad. Wet., Proc., Ser. A 60 (1957), 608619.Google Scholar
Taunt, D. R., ‘Remarks on the isomorphism problem in theories of construction of finite groups’, Proc. Cambridge Philos. Soc. 51 (1955), 1624.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vera López, A. and Ortiz de Elguea, L., ‘The conjugacy-vectors of all relative holomorphs of an elementary Abelian group of order 16’, Port. Math. 47 (1990), 243257.Google Scholar