Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T07:35:26.343Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The visual responsiveness of the tsetse fly Glossina morsitans Westw. (Glossinidae) to moving objects: the effects of hunger, sex, host odour and stimulus characteristics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

John Brady
John Brady
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology & Applied Entomology, Imperial College of Science & Technology, London SW7
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The responses of adult Glossina morsitans Westw. to large slowly moving visual stimuli were tested in the laboratory. The standard stimulus, lasting 60 s, consisted of a vertical black stripe (5° wide) on a white background moved 12 times past a window (25° wide) at 13·5°/s. The kinetic responses (take-off), but not orientation towards the stripe, went through a daily cycle with morning and evening maxima some 500% greater than the mid-day response. Kinetic responsiveness in both sexes and all ages of fly increased in an overall linear manner during five days' starvation, though pregnant females were about half as responsive as mature males. The intensity of orientation also increased with starvation, at least in males. For take-off, the minimum stripe width eliciting responses subtended ca 0·6° to the flies, and the optimum angular velocity was 3–7°/s, for orientation, 2–20°/s; the distance of the stripe appeared unimportant. Human odour elicited take-offs in the absence of the visual stimulus, and enhanced the visual responses if these were tested within three minutes of the start of odour stimulation; these effects were much greater in teneral than in mature males. It is concluded that the differences between the sexes and physiological stages of fly are mainly quantitative, and that the accepted view of four physiologically distinguishable phases of behaviour is therefore unsatisfactory. Instead, it is proposed that tsetse behaviour is the outcome of continuously variable responsiveness to visual host stimuli, and not a succession of behavioural entities.

Type
Research Paper
Information
Bulletin of Entomological Research , Volume 62 , Issue 2 , November 1972 , pp. 257 - 280
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1972

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Brady, J. (1970). Characteristics of spontaneous activity in tsetse flies.—Nature, Lond. 228, 286–287.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brady, J. (1972). Spontaneous, circadian components of tsetse fly activity.—J. Insect Physiol. 18, 471–484.Google Scholar
Bursell, E. (1960 a). The measurement of size in tsetse flies (Glossina).—Bull. ent. Res. 51, 33–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bursell, E. (1960 b). Loss of water by excretion and defaecation in the tsetse fly.—J. exp. Biol. 37, 689–697.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bursell, E. (1961 a). The behaviour of tsetse flies (Glossina swynnertoni Austen) in relation to problems of sampling.—Proc. R. ent. Soc. Lond. (A) 36, 9–20.Google Scholar
Bursell, E. (1961b). Post-teneral development of the thoracic musculature in tsetse flies.—Proc. R. ent. Soc. Lond. (A) 36, 69–74.Google Scholar
Bursell, E. (1963). Aspects of the metabolism of amino acids in the tsetse fly, Glossina (Diptera).—J. Insect Physiol. 9, 439–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bursell, E. (1966 a). Aspects of the flight metabolism of tsetse flies (Glossina).—Comp. Biochem. Physiol. 19, 809–818.Google Scholar
Bursell, E. (1966 b). The nutritional state of tsetse flies from different vegetation types in Rhodesia.—Bull. ent. Res. 57, 171–180.Google Scholar
Bursell, E. (1970). Dispersal and concentration of Glossina. In Mulligan, H. W.Ed. The African trypanosomiases, 382–394. London, Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Bursell, E. & Slack, E. (1969). Indications concerning the flight activity of tsetse flies (Glossina morsitans Westw.) in the field—Bull. ent. Res. 58, 575–579.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bursell, E., Slack, E. & Kuwengwa, T. (1972). Aspects of the development of flight musculature in the tsetse fly (Glossina morsitans). Second symposium on tsetse fly breeding in the laboratory and its practical applications,Bristol,1971.—Trans. R. Soc. trop. Med. Hyg. 66, 319–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burtr, E. T. & Catron, W. T. (1969). Resolution of the locust eye measured by rotation of radial striped patterns—Proc. R. Soc. (B) 173, 513–529.Google Scholar
Burtt, E. T. & Patferson, J. A. (1970). Internal muscle in the eye of an insect.—Nature, Lond. 228, 183–184.Google Scholar
Buxton, P. A. (1955). The natural history of tsetse flies. An account of the biology of the genus Glossina (Diptera).—Mem. Lond. School Hyg. trop. Med. No. 10, 816 pp.Google Scholar
Chapman, R. F. (1961). Some experiments to determine the methods used in host-finding by the tsetse fly, Glossina medicorum Austen.—Bull. ent. Res. 52, 83–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dame, D. A., Birkenmeyer, D. R. & Bursell, E. (1969). Development of the thoracic muscle and flight behaviour of Glossina morsitans orientalis Vanderplank.—Bull. ent. Res. 59, 345–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dean, G. J. W., Clements, S. A. & Paget, J. (1969). Observations on sex attraction and mating behaviour of the tsetse fly Glossina morsitans orientoiis Vanderplank.—Bull. ent. Res. 59, 355–365.Google Scholar
Dethier, V. G. (1954). Notes on the biting response of tsetse flies—Am. I. trop. Med. Hyg. 3, 160–171.Google Scholar
Fiske, W. F. (1920). Investigations into the bionomics of Glossina palpalis.—Bull. ent. Res. 10, 347–463.Google Scholar
Ford, J. (1969). Feeding and other responses of tsetse flies to man and ox and their epide miological significance.—Acta trop. 26, 249–264.Google Scholar
Ford, J. (1971). The role of the trypanosomiasis in African ecology—a study of the tsetse fly problem.—568 pp. Oxford, Clarendon.Google Scholar
Foster, W. A. (1972). Male sexual maturation ofG. miorsitans and G. austeni in relation to blood feeding. Second symposium on tsetse fly breeding in the laboratory and its practical applications,Bristol,1971.—Trans. R. Soc. trop. Med. Hyg. 66, 311.Google Scholar
Galun, R. & Margalit, J. (1969). Adenine nucleotides as feeding stimulants of the tsetse fly Glossina austeni Newst.—Nature, Lond. 222, 583–584.Google Scholar
Gatehouse, A. G. (1970). Interactions between stimuli in the induction of probing by Stomoxys calcitrans.—J. Insect Physiol. 16, 991–1000.Google Scholar
Gatehouse, A. G.. (1972 a). Some responses of tsetse flies to visual and olfactory stimuli.—Nature, New Biol. 236, 63–64.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gatebouse, A. G.. (1972 b). Host−finding behaviour of tsetse flies. In Canning, E. U. & Wright, C. A.Eds. Behavioural aspects of parasite transmission.—Zool. J. Linn. Soc. 51, Suppl. 1 (in press).Google Scholar
Glasgow, J. P.. (1961). The feeding habits of Glossina swynnertoni Austen.—J. Anim. Ecol. 30, 77–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glasgow, J. P.. (1963). The distribution and abundance of tsetse.—241 pp. Oxford, Pergamon.Google Scholar
Jackson, C. H. N. (1946). An artificially isolated generation of tsetse flies (Diptera).—Bull. ent. Res. 37, 291–299.Google Scholar
Jahn, T. L.. & Wulff, V. J.. (1950). Photoreception. In Prosser, C. L.Ed. Comparative animal physiology, 381–446. Philadelphia, Saunders.Google Scholar
Kellog, F. E.. & Wright, R. H.. (1962). The olfactory guidance of flying insects. III. A technique for observing and recording flight paths.—Can. Ent. 94, 486–493.Google Scholar
Langley, P. A.. (1970). Post-teneral development of thoracic flight musculature in the tsetse-flies Glossina austeni and G. morsitans.—Entomologia exp. appl. 13, 133–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lloyd, L. (1912). Notes on Glossina morsitans Westw. in the Luangwa valley, Northern Rhodesia.—Bull. ent. Res. 3, 233–239.Google Scholar
Machado, A., De, B. (1970). Les races geographiques de Glossina morsitans. In de Azevedo, J. F.Ed. Criacão da mosca tsé-tsé em laboratário e sua aplicação prática 1.° symposium internacional 22 e 23 de abril de 1969. Tsetse fly breeding under laboratory conditions and its practical application. 1st international symposium22nd and 23rd April 1969.Lisbon, Portugal,Junta de Investiga¸ôes do Ultramar. 471–486.Google Scholar
Mazokhin-Porshnyakov, G. A.. (1969). Insect vision.—306 pp. New York, Plenum.Google Scholar
Mimura, K. (1971). Movement discrimination by the visual system of flies.—Z. vergi. Physiol. 73, 105–138.Google Scholar
Nash, T. A. M. (1969). Africa's bane—the tsetse fly.—224 pp. London, Collins.Google Scholar
Pilson, R. D.. & Pilson, B. M.. (1967). Behaviour studies of Glossina morsitans Westw. in the field.—Bul. ent. Res. 57, 227–257.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pollock, J. N.. (1970). Sperm transfer by spermatophores in Glossina austeni Newstead.—Nature, Lond. 225, 1063–1064.Google Scholar
Swynnerton, C. F. M. (1936). The tsetse flies of East Africa. A first study of their ecology, with a view to their control.—Trans. R. ent. Soc. Lond. 84, 1–579.Google Scholar
Turner, D. A.. (1971). Olfactory perception of live hosts and carbon dioxide by the tsetse fly Glossina morsitans orientalis Vanderplank.—Bull. ent. Res. 61, 75–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vale, G. A.. (1972). Some aspects of the field study of tsetse flies.—Rhod. Sci. News 6, 10–13.Google Scholar
Vanderplank, F. L. (1947). Experiments in the hybridisation of tsetse−flies (Glossina, Diptera) and the possibility of a new method of control.—Trans. R. ent. Soc. Lond. 98, 1–18.Google Scholar