Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T17:55:10.188Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Vertical and temporal distribution of Helicoverpa zea (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) larvae in determinate and indeterminate soybean

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 September 2020

Dominic D. Reisig Open the ORCID record for Dominic D. Reisig [Opens in a new window] ,
Don Cook ,
Jeremy K. Greene ,
Michael Caprio ,
Jeff Gore ,
Fred Musser  and
Francis Reay-Jones
Dominic D. Reisig*
Affiliation:
Department of Entomology and Plant Pathology, Vernon G. James Research and Extension Center, North Carolina State University, 207 Research Station Rd., Plymouth, NC27962, USA
Don Cook
Affiliation:
Delta Research & Extension Center, Mississippi State University, P.O. Box 197, Stoneville, MS38776, USA
Jeremy K. Greene
Affiliation:
Department of Plant and Environmental Sciences, Edisto Research and Education Center, Clemson University, 64 Research Road, Blackville, SC29817, USA
Michael Caprio
Affiliation:
Department of Biochemistry, Molecular Biology, Entomology and Plant Pathology, Mississippi State University, Box 9775, Mississippi State, MS39762, USA
Jeff Gore
Affiliation:
Delta Research & Extension Center, Mississippi State University, P.O. Box 197, Stoneville, MS38776, USA
Fred Musser
Affiliation:
Department of Biochemistry, Molecular Biology, Entomology and Plant Pathology, Mississippi State University, Box 9775, Mississippi State, MS39762, USA
Francis Reay-Jones
Affiliation:
Department of Plant and Environmental Sciences, Pee Dee Research and Education Center, Clemson University, 2200 Pocket Road, Florence, SC29506-9727, USA
*
Author for correspondence: Dominic D. Reisig, Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Most oviposition by Helicoverpa zea (Boddie) occurs near the top of the canopy in soybean, Glycine max (L.) Merr, and larval abundance is influenced by the growth habit of plants. However, the vertical distribution of larvae within the canopy is not as well known. We evaluated the vertical distribution of H. zea larvae in determinate and indeterminate varieties, hypothesizing that larval distribution in the canopy would vary between these two growth habits and over time. We tested this hypothesis in a naturally infested replicated field experiment and two experimentally manipulated cage experiments. In the field experiment, flowering time was synchronized between the varieties by manipulating planting date, while infestation timing was manipulated in the cage experiments. Larvae were recovered using destructive sampling of individual soybean plants, and their vertical distribution by instar was recorded from three sampling points over time in each experiment. While larval population growth and development varied between the determinate and indeterminate varieties within and among experiments, we found little evidence that larvae have preference for different vertical locations in the canopy. This study lends support to the hypothesis that larval movement and location within soybean canopies do not result entirely from oviposition location and nutritional requirements.

Keywords

Canopygrowth habitmovementovipositional locationpreference
Type
Research Paper
Information
Bulletin of Entomological Research , Volume 111 , Issue 3 , June 2021 , pp. 282 - 288
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ablett, GR, Beversdorf, WD and Dirks, VA (1991) Row width and seeding rate performance of indeterminate, semideterminate, and determinate soybean. Journal of Production Agriculture 4, 391–395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alston, DG, Bradley, JR Jr, Schmitt, DP and Coble, HD (1991) Response of Helicoverpa zea (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) populations to canopy development in soybean as influenced by Heterodera glycines (Nematoda: Heteroderidae) and annual weed population densities. Journal of Economic Entomology 84, 267–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, AC and Yeargan, KV (1998) Influence of soybean canopy closure on predator abundances and predation on Helicoverpa zea (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) eggs. Environmental Entomology 27, 1488–1495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bradley, JR Jr. and van Duyn, JW (1980) Insect Pest Management in North Carolina Soybeans. Boulder, CO: Westview Press Inc., pp. 343–354.Google Scholar
Bradley, JR, Herzog, GA, Roach, SH, Stinner, RE and Terry, LI (1986) Cultural control in southeastern U.S. cropping systems. In Johnson, SJ, King, EG and JR, Bradley (eds), Theory and Tactics of Heliothis Population Management: 1. Cultural and Biological Control, vol. 316. Tifton, GA: Southern Cooperative Series Bulletin, pp. 22–27.Google Scholar
Braswell, LR, Reisig, DD, Sorenson, CE and Collins, GD (2019) Development and dispersal of Helicoverpa zea (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) on non-Bt and Bt pyramided cotton. Environmental Entomology 48, 465–477.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dieghan, J, McPherson, RM and Ravlin, FW (1985) Comparison of sweep-net and ground-cloth sampling methods for estimating arthropod densities in different soybean cropping systems. Journal of Economic Entomology 78, 208–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duffield, SJ and Dillon, ML (2005) The emergence and control of overwintering Helicoverpa armigera pupae in southern New South Wales. Australian Journal of Entomology 44, 316–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eckel, CS, Terry, LI, Bradley, JR Jr. and Van Duyn, JW (1992) Changes in within-plant distribution of Helicoverpa zea (Boddie) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) on soybeans. Environmental Entomology 21, 287–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hardwick, DF (1965) The Corn Earworm Complex. Ottawa, Canada: Entomological Society of Canada.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hillhouse, TL and Pitre, HN (1976) Oviposition by Heliothis on soybeans and cotton. Journal of Economic Entomology 69, 144–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kenward, MG and Roger, JH (1997) Small sample interference for fixed effects from restricted maximum likelihood. Biometrics 53, 983–997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Littell, RC, Milliken, GA, Stroup, WW, Wolfinger, RD and Schabenberger, O (2006) SAS for Mixed Models, 2nd edn. Cary, NC: SAS Institute.Google Scholar
Mayse, MA (1978) Effects of spacing between rows on soybean arthropod populations. Journal of Applied Ecology 15, 439–450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayse, MA (1984) Soybean row-spacing: effects on arthropod population patterns and sampling considerations. Environmental Management 8, 325–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McWilliams, JM (1983) Relationship of soybean pod development to bollworm and tobacco budworm damage. Journal of Economic Entomology 76, 502–506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Musser, FR, Catchot, AL Jr., Conley, SP, Davis, JA, DiFonzo, C, Greene, J, Lorenz, GM, Owens, D, Reed, T, Reisig, DD, Roberts, P, Royer, T, Seiter, NJ, Stewart, SD, Taylor, S, Tilmon, K and Way, MO (2018) 2017 Soybean insect losses in the United States. Midsouth Entomologist 11, 1–23.Google Scholar
Musser, FR, Catchot, AL Jr., Conley, SP, Davis, JA, DiFonzo, C, Greene, JK, Lorenz, GM, Owens, D, Reed, T, Reisig, DD, Roberts, P, Royer, T, Seiter, NJ, Stewart, SD, Taylor, S, Tilmon, K, Villanueva, RT and Way, MO (2019) 2018 Soybean insect losses in the United States. Midsouth Entomologist 12, 1–24.Google Scholar
Parvez, AQ, Gardner, FP and Boote, KJ (1989) Determinate- and indeterminate-type soybean cultivar responses to pattern, density, and planting sate. Crop Science 29, 150–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pitre, HN and Hillhouse, TL (1981) Establishment of infestation and behavior of Heliothis zea on soybeans. Journal of the Georgia Entomological Society 16, 28–34.Google Scholar
Reisig, DD, Cook, D, Greene, J, Caprio, M, Gore, J, Musser, F and Reay-Jones, F (2020) Location of Helicoverpa zea (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) larvae on different plant parts of determinate and indeterminate soybean. Bulletin of Entomological Research 1–7. doi: 10.1017/S0007485320000280.Google ScholarPubMed
SAS Institute (2011) User Manual, version 9.3. Cary, NC: SAS Institute.Google Scholar
Sprenkel, RK, Brooks, WM, VanDuyn, JW and Deitz, LL (1979) The effects of three cultural variables on the incidence of Nomuraea rileyi, phytophagous Lepidoptera, and their predators on soybeans. Environmental Entomology 8, 334–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Studebaker, GE, Spurgeon, DW and Mueller, AJ (1991) Calibration of ground cloth and sweep net sampling methods for larvae of corn earworm and soybean looper (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) in soybean. Journal of Economic Entomology 84, 1625–1629.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suits, R, Reisig, D and Burrack, H (2017) Feeding preference and performance of Helicoverpa zea (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) larvae on various soybean tissue types. Florida Entomologist 100, 162–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Terry, I, Bradley, JR Jr and Van Duyn, JW (1987) Within-plant distribution of Heliothis zea (Boddie) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) eggs on soybeans. Environmental Entomology 16, 625–629.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Terry, I, Bradley, JR Jr and Duyn, JWV (1989) Establishment of early instar Heliothis zea on soybeans. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 51, 233–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zeiss, MR and Klubertanz, TH (1993) Sampling programs for soybean arthropods. In Pedigo, LP and Buntin, GD (eds), Handbook of Sampling Methods for Arthropods in Agriculture. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, pp. 539–602.Google Scholar