Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T21:50:22.265Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Variation in tolerance of seven species of stored product Coleoptera to methyl bromide and phosphine in strains from twenty-nine countries

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

Barbara D. Hole
Barbara D. Hole
Affiliation:
Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, Slough, Berks., UK
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The toxicities at 25°C and 70% RH of methyl bromide at about 4 mg/litre and phosphine at about 0·24 mg/litre were determined for large populations, including all developmental stages, of a number of strains of seven species of stored product beetles from 29 countries for a range of exposure periods. The species tested were Oryzaephilus surmamensis (L.), Rhyzopertha dominica (F.), Sitophilus granarius (L.), S. oryzae (L.), S. zeamais Motsch., Tribolium castaneum (Hbst.) and T. confusum Duv. With both fumigants, some individuals of certain strains of S. oryzae and T. castaneum survived a concentration × time product twice that sufficient to kill every individual of other strains of these species, and this was also true for R. dominica with methyl bromide and T. confusum with phosphine. With methyl bromide, some individuals of six species survived the longest exposure used. For the two species of Tribolium, this was 48 h, and for the three of Sitophilus and R. dominica it was 32 h. With phosphine, individuals in many strains of S. granarius, S. oryzae and S. zeamais survived for 8 days. In several of the species, there was some correlation between the tolerances of immature stages and of adults for both fumigants. Many strains were tolerant to both fumigants.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Bulletin of Entomological Research , Volume 71 , Issue 2 , June 1981 , pp. 299 - 306
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1981

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anon. (1973) Report of the ninth session of the F.A.O. Working Party of Experts on Resistance of Pests to Pesticides.—17 pp. Rome. F.A.O.Google Scholar
Anon. (1975) Recommended methods for the detection and measurement of resistance of agricultural pests to pesticides. Tentative method for adults of some major pest species of stored cereals, with methyl bromide and phosphine—FAO method no. 16.—Pl Prot. Bull. F.A.O. 23, 12–15.Google Scholar
Bell, C. H., Hole, B. D. & Evans, P. H. (1977). The occurrence of resistance to phosphine in adult and egg stages of strains of Rhyzopertha dominica (F.) (Coleoptera: Bostrichidae).—J. stored Prod. Res. 13, 91–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bond, E. J. & Upitis, E. (1976). Toxicity and uptake of methyl bromide in hybrid descendants of resistant and susceptible Sitophilus granarius (L.).—J. stored Prod. Res. 12, 261–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, W. B. (1959). Fumigation with methyl bromide under gas-proof sheets.—Pest Infest. Res. Bull. no. 1 (2nd edn), 44 pp. London, H.M.S.O.Google Scholar
Bruce, R. B., Robbins, A. J. & Tuft, T. O. (1962). Phosphine residues from Phostoxintreated grain.—J. agric. Fd Chem. 10, 18–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Champ, B. R. & Dyte, C. E. (1976). Report of the FAO global survey of pesticide susceptibility of stored grain pests.—297 pp. Rome, FAO. (FAO Plant Production and Protection Series No. 5.)Google Scholar
Howe, R. W. (1962). The entomological problems of assessing the success of a fumigation of stored produce.—Proc. llth Int. Congr. Ent. 2, 288–90.Google Scholar
Howe, R. W. & Hole, B. D. (1966). The susceptibility of the developmental stages of Sitophilus granarius (L.) (Coleoptera, Curculionidae) to methyl bromide.—J. stored Prod. Res. 2, 13–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, S. E. (1945). Methyl bromide as a fumigant: determination in air.—J. Soc. Chem. Ind., Lond. 64, 57–61.Google Scholar
Lindgren, D. L. & Vincent, L. E. (1965). The susceptibility of laboratory-reared and field-collected cultures of Tribolium confusum and T. castaneum to ethylene dibromide, hydrocyanic acid, and methyl bromide.—J. econ. Ent. 58, 551–555.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindgren, D. L. & Vincent, L. E. (1966). Relative toxicity of hydrogen phosphide to various stored-product insects.—J. stored Prod. Res. 2, 141–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Monro, H. A. U., Musgrave, A. J. & Upitis, E. (1961). Induced tolerance of stored-product beetles to methyl bromide.—Ann. appl. Biol. 49, 373–377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Monro, H. A. U. & Upitis, E. (1956). Selection of populations of the granary weevil Sitophilus granarius L. more resistant to methyl bromide fumigation.—Can. Ent. 88. 37–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Monro, H. A. U., Upitis, E. & Bond, E. J. (1972). Resistance of a laboratory strain of Sitophilus granarius (L.) (Coleoptera, Curculionidae) to phosphine.—J. stored Prod. Res. 8, 199–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quayle, H. J. (1938). The development of resistance to hydrocyanic acid in certain scale insects.—Hilgardia 11, 183–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar