Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T18:43:55.680Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Transcriptomic analysis of the gonads of Locusta migratoria (Orthoptera: Acrididae) following infection with Paranosema locustae

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 October 2024

Xuewei Kong
Affiliation:
International Research Center for the Collaborative Containment of Cross-Border Pests in Central Asia, Xinjiang Key Laboratory of Special Species Conservation and Regulatory Biology, College of Life Sciences, Xinjiang Normal University, Urumqi 830054, China Tacheng, Research Field (Migratory Biology), Observation and Research Station of Xinjiang, Tacheng 834700, China
Xinrui Guo
Affiliation:
International Research Center for the Collaborative Containment of Cross-Border Pests in Central Asia, Xinjiang Key Laboratory of Special Species Conservation and Regulatory Biology, College of Life Sciences, Xinjiang Normal University, Urumqi 830054, China Tacheng, Research Field (Migratory Biology), Observation and Research Station of Xinjiang, Tacheng 834700, China
Jun Lin
Affiliation:
Central for Prevention and Control of Prediction & Forecast Prevention of Locust and Rodent, Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, China
Hui Liu
Affiliation:
International Research Center for the Collaborative Containment of Cross-Border Pests in Central Asia, Xinjiang Key Laboratory of Special Species Conservation and Regulatory Biology, College of Life Sciences, Xinjiang Normal University, Urumqi 830054, China Tacheng, Research Field (Migratory Biology), Observation and Research Station of Xinjiang, Tacheng 834700, China
Huihui Zhang
Affiliation:
International Research Center for the Collaborative Containment of Cross-Border Pests in Central Asia, Xinjiang Key Laboratory of Special Species Conservation and Regulatory Biology, College of Life Sciences, Xinjiang Normal University, Urumqi 830054, China Tacheng, Research Field (Migratory Biology), Observation and Research Station of Xinjiang, Tacheng 834700, China
Hongxia Hu
Affiliation:
International Research Center for the Collaborative Containment of Cross-Border Pests in Central Asia, Xinjiang Key Laboratory of Special Species Conservation and Regulatory Biology, College of Life Sciences, Xinjiang Normal University, Urumqi 830054, China Tacheng, Research Field (Migratory Biology), Observation and Research Station of Xinjiang, Tacheng 834700, China
Wangpeng Shi
Affiliation:
College of Plant Protection, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China
Rong Ji
Affiliation:
International Research Center for the Collaborative Containment of Cross-Border Pests in Central Asia, Xinjiang Key Laboratory of Special Species Conservation and Regulatory Biology, College of Life Sciences, Xinjiang Normal University, Urumqi 830054, China Tacheng, Research Field (Migratory Biology), Observation and Research Station of Xinjiang, Tacheng 834700, China
Roman Jashenko
Affiliation:
Ministry of Education and Science of the Republic of Kazakhstan, Almaty 050060, Kazakhstan
Han Wang*
Affiliation:
International Research Center for the Collaborative Containment of Cross-Border Pests in Central Asia, Xinjiang Key Laboratory of Special Species Conservation and Regulatory Biology, College of Life Sciences, Xinjiang Normal University, Urumqi 830054, China Tacheng, Research Field (Migratory Biology), Observation and Research Station of Xinjiang, Tacheng 834700, China
*
Corresponding author: Han Wang; Email: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Paranosema locustae is an environmentally friendly parasitic predator with promising applications in locust control. In this study, transcriptome sequencing was conducted on gonadal tissues of Locusta migratoria males and females infected and uninfected with P. locustae at different developmental stages. A total of 18,635 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were identified in female ovary tissue transcriptomes, with the highest number of DEGs observed at 1 day post-eclosion (7141). In male testis tissue transcriptomes, a total of 32,954 DEGs were identified, with the highest number observed at 9 days post-eclosion (11,245). Venn analysis revealed 25 common DEGs among female groups and 205 common DEGs among male groups. Gene ontology and Kyoto Encyclopaedia of Genes and Genome analyses indicated that DEGs were mainly enriched in basic metabolism such as amino acid metabolism, carbohydrate metabolism, lipid metabolism, and immune response processes. Protein–protein interaction analysis results indicated that L. migratoria regulates the expression of immune- and reproductive-related genes to meet the body's demands in different developmental stages after P. locustae infection. Immune- and reproductive-related genes in L. migratoria gonadal tissue were screened based on database annotation information and relevant literature. Genes such as Tsf, Hex1, Apolp-III, Serpin, Defense, Hsp70, Hsp90, JHBP, JHE, JHEH1, JHAMT, and VgR play important roles in the balance between immune response and reproduction in gonadal tissues. For transcriptome validation, Tsf, Hex1, and ApoLp-III were selected and verified by quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR). Correlation analysis revealed that the qRT-PCR expression patterns were consistent with the RNA-Seq results. These findings contribute to further understanding the interaction mechanisms between locusts and P. locustae.

Type
Research Paper
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press

Introduction

Locusts are characterised by their gregarious behaviour, strong reproductive capacity, omnivorous diet, and strong migratory ability, causing severe damage to crops and grasslands, thereby posing a serious threat to food security and the healthy development of the ecological environment. Conducting scientifically effective comprehensive control measures is crucial. Chemical pesticide spraying is the primary method for locust control, particularly effective in controlling migratory and outbreak locust plagues. However, it often leads to serious issues such as locust resistance, pesticide residues, and environmental pollution. Therefore, there is an urgent need to find environmentally friendly, safe, and efficient pest control strategies.

Paranosema locustae is a single-celled eukaryotic organism that parasitises selectively on locusts and other orthopteran insects. It infects hosts and reproduces indefinitely, causing metabolic disorders, hindered organ development, reduced mobility, prolonged developmental periods, weakened reproductive capacity, and continuously spreads horizontally and vertically within locust populations, playing an important role in regulating locust population numbers (Zhang and Lecoq, Reference Zhang and Lecoq2021; Liu et al., Reference Liu, Wei, Ye, Zhang, Yang, Shi, Zhang, Jashenko, Ji and Hu2023; Zhang et al., Reference Zhang, Xu, Cao, Wang and Zhang2023a, Reference Zhang, Yang, Wang, Liu, Shi, Kabak, Ji and Hu2023b). P. locustae exhibits high safety to non-orthopteran insects, vertebrates, and minimal environmental impact, thus becoming an important means of green locust control (Dakhel et al., Reference Dakhel, Latchininsky and Jaronski2019; Chen et al., Reference Chen, Gao, Li, Zhang, Huang, Wang, Song, Xing, Liu, Nie, Nie, Hua, Zhang, Wang, Ma and Zhang2020; Zhang and Lecoq, Reference Zhang and Lecoq2021).

To resist pathogen infections, locusts must invest a considerable amount of energy. However, limited energy intake cannot simultaneously meet the energy demands of immunity and reproduction. Therefore, there is a trade-off in resource allocation when organisms face stress (Schwenke, et al., Reference Schwenke, Lazzaro and Wolfner2016; Budischak et al., Reference Budischak, Hansen, Caudron, Garnier, Kartzinel, Pelczer, Cressler, Leeuwen and Graham2018; Shang et al., Reference Shang, Niu, Ding, Zhang, Ye, Zhang, Smagghe and Wang2018; Yao et al., Reference Yao, Xu, Dong, Que, Quan and Chen2018). Wang et al. (Reference Wang, Liu, Xia, Xie, Tang and Wang2019a) demonstrated that upon infection with Micrococcus luteus, genes such as PPO1, antimicrobial peptides, and defensins were upregulated, while Vgs expression levels were downregulated, indicating that locusts prioritise increasing investment in immune responses to maintain survival under M. luteus stress. P. locustae infection can induce immune response reactions in various host tissues, leading to increased immune investment and upregulation of immune-related gene expression. Lv et al. (Reference Lv, Mohamed, Zhang, Zhang and Zhang2016) found that P. locustae infection induces the expression of defensins in Locusta migratoria fat bodies and salivary glands, but the transcription levels of defensins in fat bodies are lower, suggesting that P. locustae may weaken the immune response of fat bodies, making them more susceptible to infection. After L. migratoria infection with P. locustae, significant decreases in vitellogenin and vitellogenin receptor transcription expression, as well as reductions in vitellin content in fat bodies, haemolymph, and ovaries were observed, accompanied by significant decreases in egg cell number, ovarian length, and ovarian weight in female locusts, inhibiting vitellin deposition and ultimately reducing reproductive capacity (Chen et al., Reference Chen, Shen, Song, Zhang and Yan2002; Zhang and Lecoq, Reference Zhang and Lecoq2021; Hu et al., Reference Hu, Wang, Tang, Xie, Ding, Xu, Tang, Zhang and Wang2022). Most studies imply that there is a mutual constraint between immunity and reproduction in the body after infection. The activation of immune responses leads to a diminished reproductive capacity.

Locusts possess strong reproductive abilities, which are the main reason for their outbreak. How do reproductive organs respond when the organism is under P. locustae infection stress? This study conducted transcriptome sequencing on gonadal tissues of L. migratoria males and females infected and uninfected with P. locustae at different developmental stages, analysed relevant bioinformatics data, and identified key genes and metabolic pathways involved in the balance between immunity and reproduction in L. migratoria gonadal tissues. This research provides data support for exploring the molecular biology mechanisms of interaction between P. locustae and locusts, screening optimal pest control targets, and further improving pest control effectiveness.

Materials and methods

Insect sources

L. migratoria eggs obtained from laboratory breeding were incubated in an artificial breeding chamber under the following conditions: temperature at 30 ± 1°C, humidity at 50 ± 5%, and a light–dark cycle of 14 L:10 D. After hatching, locust nymphs were reared to adulthood under the aforementioned conditions.

P. locustae infection

P. locustae provided by China Agricultural University was stored at −20°C. Based on preliminary trial results, each L. migratoria was infected with 1 × 104 spores of P. locustae. L. migratoria third-instar nymphs were infected using an individual feeding method (Panek et al., Reference Panek, El Alaoui, Mone, Urbach, Demettre, Texier, Brun, Zanzoni, Peyretaillade, Parisot, Lerat, Peyret, Delbac and Biron2014). Infected third-instar nymphs were reared to adulthood under the conditions mentioned in the section ‘Insect sources’. Then testes/ovaries were collected at third-instar nymphs (1 day post-infection) and also 1, 9, and 19 days post-eclosion of adults. These tissues were placed in RNA preservation solution (Tiangen, Beijing, China) and stored at −80°C for transcriptome sequencing. Three replicates were set for each age group, totalling 48 samples. Uninfected nymphs served as the control group.

RNA extraction and transcriptome sequencing

Total RNA from each sample was extracted using Trizol (Invitrogen, USA), and residual genomic DNA was removed using DNase I (Takara, China). The quantity and quality of RNA samples were assessed using a Nano Drop spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, DE). Transcriptome sequencing was conducted by Beijing Novogene Company using Illumina sequencing technology.

Data quality control

The Illumina platform converts the sequenced image signals into text signals via CASAVA Base Calling and stores them as raw data in the fastq format. Clean reads were obtained by removing reads containing adapter, poly-N, and low-quality reads from raw data. At the same time, Q20, Q30, and GC (guanine deoxyribonucleotide and cytosine deoxyribonucleotide) content of the clean data were calculated. All the downstream analyses were based on the clean reads with high quality.

De novo transcriptome assembly and gene annotation

Trinity was used to assemble clean reads (Grabherr et al., Reference Grabherr, Haas, Yassour, Levin, Thompson, Amit, Adiconis, Lin, Raychowdhury, Zeng, Chen, Mauceli, Hacohen, Gnirke, Rhind, Palma, Birren, Nusbaum, Lindblad-Toh, Friedman and Regev2011). Corset (Davidson and Oshlack, Reference Davidson and Oshlack2014) was adopted to cluster the assembled contigs based on shared reads. The longest transcripts of each cluster were selected as unigenes, which were then annotated and applied for the following analyses. Gene function was annotated based on the following databases: Nr (NCBI non-redundant protein sequences), Nt (NCBI non-redundant nucleotide sequences), Pfam (Protein family), COG (Cluster of Orthologous Groups of proteins) and KOG (euKaryotic Orthologous Groups), Swiss-Prot (a manually annotated and reviewed protein sequence database), KEGG (Kyoto Encyclopaedia of Genes and Genome), and GO (Gene Ontology).

Screening and enrichment analysis of differentially expressed genes

FPKM values were calculated to represent gene expression levels (Trapnell et al., Reference Trapnell, Williams, Pertea, Mortazavi, Kwan, van Baren, Salzberg, Wold and Pachter2010). DESeq2 was used to determine differences in gene expression levels between two groups (Love et al., Reference Love, Huber and Anders2014), calculating P-values, performing multiple hypothesis testing correction (Benjamini–Hochberg), and obtaining false-discovery rates (represented as P adj). Using P adj < 0.05 and |log2FoldChange| > 2 as criteria for selecting differentially expressed genes (DEGs). DEGs were screened for CFn3 vs. TFn3 (third-instar female locusts in the control group vs. infected group), CF1 vs. TF1 (1-day-old female locusts in the control group vs. infected group), CF9 vs. TF9 (9-day-old female locusts in the control group vs. infected group), CF19 vs. TF19 (19-day-old female locusts in the control group vs. infected group), CMn3 vs. TMn3 (third-instar male locusts in the control group vs. infected group), CM1 vs. TM1 (1-day-old male locusts in the control group vs. infected group), CM9 vs. TM9 (9-day-old male locusts in the control group vs. infected group), and CM19 vs. TM19 (19-day-old male locusts in the control group vs. infected group). GOseq (Young et al., Reference Young, Wakefield, Smyth and Oshlack2010) and KOBAS (Mao et al., Reference Mao, Cai, Olyarchuk and Wei2005) were used for GO and KEGG annotation and functional enrichment analysis of DEGs, with P adj < 0.05 as the significance enrichment threshold.

PPI network construction

We performed protein–protein interaction (PPI) network analysis of the DEGs using the STRING database to construct potential interactions of genes with interaction scores >0.15. Then the networks created by STRING were imported into Cytoscape (version 3.9.1) software for visualisation.

Expression analysis of gonadal tissue stress response-related genes

Three immune- and reproductive-related genes were validated by quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) using TB Green® Premix Ex Taq™ II (Takara, China), with EF1α as the reference gene. Each reaction system (20 μl) included 10 μl TB Green, 1.0 μl each of upstream and downstream primers (table S1), 1 μl cDNA template, and 7.0 μl double-distilled water. The reaction programme included pre-denaturation at 95°C for 2 min; followed by 40 cycles of denaturation at 95°C for 10 s, annealing at 60°C for 10 s, and extension at 72°C for 10 s; and a final melting curve stage. Three samples were selected for each age group, with each sample tested three times. The Ct values were collected after the reaction, and the relative gene expression levels were calculated using the 2−ΔΔCt method. Data were represented as mean ± standard error. Single-factor analysis of variance (ANOVA) was performed using Origin2022 software (P < 0.05).

Results and analysis

Quality assessment of sequencing results

Transcriptome sequencing of gonadal tissues of infected and uninfected L. migratoria males and females with P. locustae was conducted using the Illumina HiSeq™ 6000 sequencing platform. Clean data for each sample ranged from 5.8 to 6.7 Gb, with GC content between 37.77 and 47.33%, and Q20 and Q30 values ranging from 97.14 to 97.77 and 92.45 to 93.71, respectively. A total of 226,186 unigenes were obtained, with an average length of 845 bp and an N50 length of 1088 bp. Unigenes longer than 1 kb accounted for 19.791% of the total (table 1). The assembly quality of Trinity.fasta, unigene.fasta, and cluster.fasta was evaluated using BUSCO software. The results showed a level of 98.1, 93.2, and 93.2% completeness for Trinity, unigene, and cluster, respectively, indicating good assembly completeness and high accuracy, suitable for subsequent analysis (fig. S1).

Table 1. Transcriptome assembly results for L. migratoria

Analysis of DEGs in L. migratoria gonadal tissues of infected and uninfected P. locustae

Using the transcriptome data of uninfected P. locustae male and female gonadal tissues as controls, analysis of DEGs was performed. Upon infection with P. locustae, L. migratoria third-instar nymphs exhibited 2382 DEGs in female ovary tissues, with 1134 downregulated genes and 1248 upregulated genes; and 4957 DEGs in male testis tissues, with 2580 downregulated genes and 2377 upregulated genes. After nymphs eclosed into adults, the number of DEGs increased. Female locusts had the most DEGs at 1 day post-eclosion, with 7141 DEGs, including 3902 downregulated and 3239 upregulated genes. DEGs in male locusts continued to increase, peaking at 9 days post-eclosion with 11,245 DEGs, including 6412 downregulated and 4833 upregulated genes (fig. 1). Venn diagrams illustrated the overlap of DEGs among different comparison groups. After infection with P. locustae, there were 25 common DEGs in female groups (CFn3 vs. TFn3, CF1 vs. TF1, CF9 vs. TF9, CF19 vs. TF19) and 205 common DEGs in male groups (CMn3 vs. TMn3, CM1 vs. TM1, CM9 vs. TM9, CM19 vs. TM19) (fig. 2).

Figure 1. Histogram analysis of the number of DEGs between samples in ovary (A) and testis (B) of L. migratoria. After infection with P. locustae, ovary tissues of L. migratoria had the most DEGs at 1 day post-eclosion, while testis tissues had the most DEGs at 9 day post-eclosion.

Figure 2. Venn diagrams analysis illustrated the overlap of DEGs among different comparison groups in ovary (A) and testis (B). After infection with P. locustae, there were 25 common DEGs in female ovary groups and 205 common DEGs in male testis groups.

Significant enrichment analysis of DEGs in GO functions

GO functional annotation analysis was performed on DEGs in female ovary tissues. Results showed no significant enrichment in CFn3 vs. TFn3 and CF1 vs. TF1 groups. In the CF9 vs. TF9 group, DEGs were significantly enriched in ribosome (GO:0005840), oxidoreductase activity (GO:0016491), and ribosome biogenesis (GO:0042254), with 91, 191, and 90 differential genes, respectively (P adj < 0.05). In the CF19 vs. TF19 group, DEGs were significantly enriched in transporter activity (GO:0005215), transmembrane transport (GO:0055085), external encapsulating structure (GO:0030312), and molecular transducer activity (GO:0060089), with 196, 165, 24, and 57 differential genes, respectively (P adj < 0.05) (fig. 3).

Figure 3. Dot plot of top 20 ranked GO terms of DEGs in different stages of female ovary of L. migratoria. The figures represent the CFn3 vs. TFn3, CF1 vs. TF1, CF9 vs. TF9, CF19 vs. TF19, respectively. The vertical axis indicates GO terms and the horizontal axis represents the gene ratio. The size of dots indicates the number of genes in the GO term, and the colour of the dots corresponds to different P adj ranges.

GO functional annotation analysis of DEGs in male testis tissues showed significant enrichment in oxidoreductase activity (GO:0016491) in the CMn3 vs. TMn3 group, with 239 differential genes (P adj < 0.05). In the CM1 vs. TM1 group, there was no significant enrichment. In the CM9 vs. TM9 group, DEGs were significantly enriched in various categories including catalytic activity (GO:0003824), catalytic activity, acting on a protein (GO:0140096), hydrolase activity (GO:0016787), carbohydrate metabolic process (GO:0005975), transferase activity (GO:0016740), protein modification process (GO:0036211), protein glycosylation (GO:0006486), microtubule-based movement (GO:0007018), lipid metabolic process (GO:0006629), and oxidoreductase activity (GO:0016491), with 2458, 696, 1159, 274, 891, 376, 45, 36, 242, and 450 differential genes, respectively (P adj < 0.05). In the CM19 vs. TM19 group, DEGs were significantly enriched in hydrolase activity (GO:0016787) and molecular transducer activity (GO:0060089), with 625 and 93 differential genes, respectively (P adj < 0.05) (fig. 4).

Figure 4. Dot plot of top 20 ranked GO terms of DEGs in different stages of male testis of L. migratoria. The figures represent the CMn3 vs. TMn3, CM1 vs. TM1, CM9 vs. TM9, CM19 vs. TM19, respectively. The vertical axis indicates GO terms and the horizontal axis represents the gene ratio. The size of dots indicates the number of genes in the GO term, and the colour of the dots corresponds to different Padj ranges.

Enrichment analysis of KEGG pathways for DEGs

Enrichment analysis of KEGG pathways for DEGs in female ovary tissues revealed significant enrichment in various metabolic pathways in different comparison groups. In the CFn3 vs. TFn3 group, DEGs were significantly enriched in pathways such as ascorbate and aldarate metabolism (ko00053), pentose and glucuronate interconversions (ko00040), arginine biosynthesis (ko00220), alanine, aspartate, and glutamate metabolism (ko00250), drug metabolism – other enzymes (ko00983), haematopoietic cell lineage (ko04640), steroid hormone biosynthesis (ko00140), fat digestion and absorption (ko04975), fructose and mannose metabolism (ko00051), retinol metabolism (ko00830), chemical carcinogenesis (ko05204), and metabolism of xenobiotics by cytochrome P450 (ko00980). Differential gene counts ranged from 5 to 13 for these pathways (P adj < 0.05). The CF1 vs. TF1 group showed no significant enrichment. In the CF9 vs. TF9 group, DEGs were significantly enriched only in the ribosome pathway (ko03010), with 72 differential genes (P adj < 0.05). In the CF19 vs. TF19 group, DEGs were significantly enriched in pathways such as lysosome (ko04142), biosynthesis of unsaturated fatty acids (ko01040), pentose and glucuronate interconversions (ko00040), glycosaminoglycan degradation (ko00531), other glycan degradation (ko00511), olfactory transduction (ko04740), metabolism of xenobiotics by cytochrome P450 (ko00980), drug metabolism – other enzymes (ko00983), longevity regulating pathway – worm (ko04212), and chemical carcinogenesis (ko05204). Differential gene counts ranged from 9 to 37 for these pathways (P adj < 0.05) (fig. 5).

Figure 5. KEGG analysis of DEGs in different stages of female ovary of L. migratoria. The figures represent the KEGG pathway for the CFn3 vs. TFn3, CF1 vs. TF1, CF9 vs. TF9, CF19 vs. TF19, respectively. The vertical axis represents the pathway name, and the horizontal axis represents the gene ratio. The size of the dots indicates the number of genes in the pathway, and the colour of the dots corresponds to different P adj ranges.

For DEGs in male testis tissues, no significant enrichment was observed in the CMn3 vs. TMn3, CM9 vs. TM9, and CM19 vs. TM19 groups. However, in the CM1 vs. TM1 group, DEGs were significantly enriched in the spliceosome pathway (ko03040), with 59 differential genes (P adj < 0.05) (fig. 6).

Figure 6. KEGG analysis of DEGs in different stages of male testis of L. migratoria. The figures represent the KEGG pathway for the CMn3 vs. TMn3, CM1 vs. TM1, CM9 vs. TM9, CM19 vs. TM19, respectively. The vertical axis represents the pathway name, and the horizontal axis represents the gene ratio. The size of the dots indicates the number of genes in the pathway, and the colour of the dots corresponds to different Padj ranges.

The network of PPI of DEGs

To further explore the possible mechanisms of gonadal tissue of L. migratoria resistance to P. locustae infection, the putative 690 key DEGs belonging to the CF1 vs. TF1 group, 225 DEGs belonging to CF9 vs. TF9 group, 757 DEGs belonging to CM1 vs. TM1 group, 1140 DEGs belonging to CM9 vs. TM9 group were used to build PPI networks. As shown in the CF1 vs. TF1 group in fig. 7, immune-related genes, such as ACSL, APC3, DNM1L, GNG13, PTPN11, and TIAM1, were significantly downregulated, while reproductive-related gene, NCOA2, was significantly upregulated in female ovary at 1 day post-eclosion. Similar results were also observed in other groups. The results indicate that immune- and reproductive-related gene expression were regulated to meet the body's demands in different developmental stages after P. locustae infection.

Figure 7. Network of PPI for DEGs. The figures represent the PPI analysis of DEGs in CF1 vs. TF1, CF9 vs. TF9, CM1 vs. TM1, CM9 vs. TM9, respectively. Nodes represent DEGs, and edges represent interactions between two DEGs. The rhombi represent DEGs related to immunity, the triangles represent DEGs related to reproduction; the circles represent DEGs related to immunity and reproduction. Red and blue represent an upward adjustment and a downward adjustment, respectively.

Selection and qRT-PCR validation of immune- and reproductive-related genes in L. migratoria gonadal tissues

Based on functional annotation and enrichment analysis of DEGs, along with relevant literature, immune- and reproductive-related DEGs were selected from the transcriptome data. These genes included Transferrin (Tsf), Hexamerin-like protein 1 (Hex1), Apolipophorin-III (ApoLp-III), and others associated with immune regulation, phagocytosis, stress response, and reproductive regulation (table 2). qRT-PCR was performed to validate the expression levels of Tsf, Hex1, and ApoLp-III. Tsf showed significant upregulation in female ovary tissues at 1 and 19 days post-eclosion and significant downregulation at 9 days post-eclosion (P < 0.05) (fig. 8A). In male testis tissues, Tsf was significantly upregulated in all developmental stages (P < 0.05) (fig. 8B). Hex1 exhibited significant upregulation in female ovary tissues at 1 and 19 days post-eclosion and in third-instar nymph male testis tissues (P < 0.05) (fig. 8C, D). However, its expression was significantly downregulated in male testis tissues at 1 day post-eclosion (P < 0.05) (fig. 8D). ApoLp-III showed significant upregulation in all developmental stages of both female ovary and male testis tissues (P < 0.05) (fig. 8E, F). A regression analysis was performed to evaluate and validate Tsf, Hex1, and ApoLp-III genes from RNA-Seq data using qRT-PCR. The results indicate a significant correlation coefficient (R 2 = 0.71–0.99) between RNA-Seq and qRT-PCR data expressed in log2FC (fig. S2). Correlation analysis revealed that the qRT-PCR expression patterns of Tsf, Hex1, and ApoLp-III were all consistent with the RNA-Seq results, indicating that the RNA-Seq results were highly reliable.

Table 2. Part of DEGs related to immunity and reproduction in gonadal tissue

Figure 8. Relative expression levels of three unigenes, including Tsf, Hex1, and ApoLp-III among different stages of ovary and testis in L. migratoria. Columns and polylines indicate the relative expression levels of genes identified by qRT-PCR and RNA-Seq, respectively. EF1α-F was used as an internal control. The details of the primers are shown in table S1. Data are expressed as mean ± SE (n = 3). Asterisks above columns indicate statistically significant differences by one-way ANOVA with Duncan's test (P < 0.05). n3 indicates third-instar locust nymphs. 1, 9, and 19 indicate 1, 9, and 19 days adult after emergence, respectively.

Discussion

Interactions between pests and pathogens have long been a focal point in life sciences research. The gonads, as crucial reproductive organs in insects, play a pivotal role in the balance and regulation of immunity and reproduction when faced with pathogen infection, which ultimately determines the population dynamics of insects. Understanding the response of gonadal tissues to pathogen stress and elucidating the strategies of immunity and reproduction can facilitate the exploration of new pest control methods, especially from the perspective of reproductive regulation.

This study utilised high-throughput transcriptome sequencing to reveal that upon infection with P. locustae, differential gene expression in the ovaries of female L. migratoria primarily enriched in various immune-related GO categories and metabolic pathways, such as ribosome, oxidoreductase activity, transporter activity, etc. The differential gene expression in the testes of male locusts enriched in processes like catalytic activity, protein glycosylation, etc. This indicates that P. locustae infection modulates the basic metabolism and immune response of insect gonadal tissues (Aufauvre et al., Reference Aufauvre, Misme-Aucouturier, Viguès, Texier, Delbac and Blot2014; Zhang et al., Reference Zhang, Chen, Keyhani, Zhang, Li and Xia2015b; Kurze et al., Reference Kurze, Dosselli, Grassl, Le Conte, Kryger, Baer and Moritz2016; Xu et al., Reference Xu, Wu, Yu, Meng, Chen, Liu, Zhong and Pan2023).

The innate immune system plays a crucial role in insect resistance to pathogen infection. Previous studies have shown that insects such as Bombyx mori (Ma et al., Reference Ma, Li, Pan, Li, Han, Xu, Lan, Chen, Yang, Chen, Sang, Ji, Li, Long and Zhou2013) and Apis mellifera (Chaimanee et al., Reference Chaimanee, Chantawannakul, Chen, Evans and Pettis2012; Aufauvre et al., Reference Aufauvre, Misme-Aucouturier, Viguès, Texier, Delbac and Blot2014) enhance their immune systems by modulating pathways like the Toll signalling pathway, JAK/STAT signalling pathway, and expression of antimicrobial peptides upon pathogen infection. Similarly, upon infection with Metarhizium acridum, the expression of immune-related genes in L. migratoria also changes (Zhang et al., Reference Zhang, Chen, Keyhani, Zhang, Li and Xia2015b). In this study, it was found that upon infection with P. locustae, the expression of immune-related genes in L. migratoria also changed. For instance, Toll-like receptor and DSCAM2 were downregulated after L. migratoria third-instar nymphs were infected with P. locustae, while DSCAM2, Defense, Lysozyme P, c-type Lysozyme were gradually upregulated after eclosion at 1, 9, and 19 days. We might expect that P. locustae may evade the host's immune response by interfering with the expression of key genes in the host's immune system in the initial stages of infection. Subsequently, the body gradually upregulates the expression of immune-related genes to resist P. locustae infection.

In our study, qRT-PCR results revealed significant upregulation of Tsf in the testicular tissues of male L. migratoria upon infection with P. locustae. We speculate that organism can enhance resistance to P. locustae by upregulating Tsf expression to avoid oxidative stress damage caused by iron overload. Iron homoeostasis plays a crucial role in the body's defence and stress response mechanisms. Transferrin (Trf) is a key protein involved in maintaining iron homoeostasis and participates in iron metabolism, oxidative stress defence, and innate immunity (Najera et al., Reference Najera, Coca, Nutsch and Gorman2019; Weber et al., Reference Weber, Park and Gorman2020, Reference Weber, Brummett, Coca, Tabunoki, Kanost, Ragan, Park and Gorman2022; Zafar et al., Reference Zafar, Huang, Xu and Jin2022). Studies have shown that upon exposure to insecticide stress, mosquitoes like Culex pipiens pallens (Tan et al., Reference Tan, Wang, Cheng, Liu, Wang, Gong, Quan, Gao and Zhu2012), Helicoverpa armigera (Zhang et al., Reference Zhang, Shang, Lu, Zhao and Gao2015a), Spodoptera littoralis (Hamama et al., Reference Hamama, Hussein, Fahmy, Fergani, Mabrouk and Farghaley2016), and L. migratoria (Gao, Reference Gao2016) exhibit upregulated expression of transferrin. Similarly, pathogen stress can induce the upregulation of host transferrin expression, thereby regulating iron homoeostasis and transport (Desjardins et al., Reference Desjardins, Sanscrainte, Goldberg, Heiman, Young, Zeng, Madhani, Becnel and Cuomo2015). For instance, in Drosophila melanogaster, transcription levels of Transferrin significantly increase after Escherichia coli infection, where it employs iron inhibition strategies to combat infection, a process dependent on nuclear factor-κB, Toll, Imd, and other signalling pathways (Iatsenko et al., Reference Iatsenko, Marra, Boquete, Peña and Lemaitre2020). Moreover, Plutella xylostella shows increased expression of PxTrf after treatment with Staphylococcus aureus, E. coli, and Isaria cicadae (Xu et al., Reference Xu, Hao, Wang, Li, Guo and Dang2020). Simultaneously, interference with PxTrf expression significantly inhibits the formation of P. xylostella haemocyte nodules and enhances its sensitivity to I. cicadae (Xu et al., Reference Xu, Hao, Wang, Li, Guo and Dang2020). In A. mellifera, infection with Nosema ceranae leads to iron deficiency in the body and induces upregulation of AmTsf expression. Silencing AmTsf expression through RNAi alleviates iron loss, enhances honey bee immunity, and increases survival rates (Rodríguez-García et al., Reference Rodríguez-García, Heerman, Cook, Evans, DeGrandi-Hoffman, Banmeke, Zhang, Huang, Hamilton and Chen2021). This multifaceted role of transferrin in the immune response is evident across various studies.

In our study, Hex1 was significantly upregulated in the ovarian tissues of female L. migratoria at 1 and 19 days post-eclosion upon infection with P. locustae. We speculate that females prioritise the upregulation of reproductive-related genes in response to immune and reproductive pressures, meeting the amino acid reserve demands for gamete development and gonadal maturation, thereby ensuring population reproduction. Hexamerin is another important functional protein involved in various life activities such as cuticle formation, hormone transport, lipid transportation, energy metabolism, diapause, metamorphosis, and plays a significant role in the immune response (Burmester, Reference Burmester2015; Janashia and Alaux, Reference Janashia and Alaux2016; Lieb et al., Reference Lieb, Ebner and Hartmut2016; Cui et al., Reference Cui, Tu, Hao, Aftab, Chen, Mark and Zhang2019). Circulifer haematoceps exhibits upregulated expression of Hexamerin upon infection with Spiroplasma citri (Eliautout et al., Reference Eliautout, Dubrana, Vincent-Monégat, Vallier, Braquart-Varnier, Poirie, Saillard, Heddi and Arricau-Bouvery2016). Similarly, treatment with organophosphate results in increased Hexamerin expression in Culex quinquefasciatus (Games et al., Reference Games, Alves, Katz, Tomich and Serrao2016). Conversely, effective chlorofluorocarbon pesticide treatment downregulates Hexamerin expression in Spodoptera exigua larvae (Wang et al., Reference Wang, Hu, Wei and Su2019b). This indicates differential regulation of Hexamerin expression under different stresses. In L. migratoria, stimulation with E. coli leads to a trend of first downregulation and then upregulation of Hex1 and Hex2 expression in fat bodies, while Hex3 and Hex4 show the opposite trend, suggesting that Hexamerin family genes have immune functions with possible mutual compensation effects among members (Zhang et al., Reference Zhang, Jiao, He and Yin2018). Injection of Antheraea pernyi larvae with S. aureus, E. coli, and Candida albicans leads to a sharp increase in Ap-hexamerin expression in fat bodies 12 h post-treatment, confirming the significant enhancement of phenoloxidase activity by Ap-hexamerin and its involvement in the early immune response of A. pernyi (Liu et al., Reference Liu, Zhu, Ma, Zhang, Wang and Zhang2019). Hexamerin also plays a crucial role in insect reproduction. Expression analysis of AcHex-2 in 5th- and 12th-instar Acrida cinerea adults shows that it is predominantly expressed in the ovaries and testes, with significantly higher expression in the 12th instar compared to the 5th instar, indicating its tissue specificity and importance during reproduction (Dong et al., Reference Dong, Zhang, Li, Lu and Yin2015).

Our qRT-PCR results indicate a significant upregulation of ApoLp-III expression in the gonadal tissues of male and female L. migratoria at 1, 9, and 19 days post-eclosion after P. locustae infection, suggesting its involvement in the immune defence response of L. migratoria against P. locustae. Additionally, transcriptome results show upregulation of Defense, Toll-like receptor, and Serpin expression in the gonadal tissues of L. migratoria at 1, 9, and 19 days post-eclosion, suggesting the possible involvement of ApoLp-III in regulating key genes of the Toll and serine protease inhibitor pathways in the immune response of L. migratoria. Apolipophorin plays a crucial role in lipid transport, lipoprotein metabolism, and innate immunity in insects, divided into ApoLp-I, ApoLp-II, and ApoLp-III (Browne et al., Reference Browne, Surlis and Kavanagh2014; Wen et al., Reference Wen, Luo, Li, Wu, Zhang, Wang and Zhang2017). As a pattern recognition molecule, ApoLp-III participates in the immune response and phagocytosis process of the organism by activating functional protein activity, thereby enhancing the antibacterial and antifungal capabilities (Zdybicka-Barabas et al., Reference Zdybicka-Barabas, Sowa-Jasiłek, Stączek, Jakubowicz and Cytrynska2015; Wijeratne and Weers, Reference Wijeratne and Weers2019; Stączek et al., Reference Stączek, Zdybicka-Barabas, Wiater, Pleszczynska and Cytrynska2020). Studies have shown significant changes in ApoLp-III levels in various insects such as Apis cerana (Kim and Jin, Reference Kim and Jin2015), Actias selene Hübner (Qian et al., Reference Qian, Wang, Zhu, Wei, Li, Liu and Wang2016), Galleria mellonella (Iwański and Andrejko, Reference Iwański and Andrejko2023), and Spodoptera litura (Vengateswari and Shivakumar, Reference Vengateswari and Shivakumar2023) upon pathogen infection, demonstrating its antimicrobial activity and importance in the response to pathogen stress. In Tenebrio molitor, silencing of TmApoLp-III expression enhances larval sensitivity to Listeria monocytogenes (Patnaik et al., Reference Patnaik, Patnaik, Park, Jo, Le and Han2015). Additionally, induction of ScApoLp-III expression is observed in the gut and fat bodies of Samia cynthia ricini upon S. aureus infection, while it is downregulated upon Pseudomonas aeruginosa induction (Yu et al., Reference Yu, Wang, Zhang, Toufeeq, Li, Li, Yang, Hu and Xu2018). Recombinant ScApoLp-III can bind to E. coli, P. aeruginosa, S. aureus, and Bacillus subtilis, strongly inhibiting the proliferation of E. coli and P. aeruginosa (Yu et al., Reference Yu, Wang, Zhang, Toufeeq, Li, Li, Yang, Hu and Xu2018). Studies have also shown that upon infection with Beauveria bassiana, BmApoLp-III expression is upregulated in B. mori larvae, and recombinant BmApoLp-III protein significantly inhibits the proliferation of B. bassiana, delaying the onset of symptoms and death in infected larvae (Wu et al., Reference Wu, Lin, Zhao, Su, Li, Zhang and Guo2021). Moreover, BmApoLp-III can regulate the expression of genes related to the Toll, JAK/STAT, and Imd signalling pathways, promoting the expression of immune effectors (Wu et al., Reference Wu, Lin, Zhao, Su, Li, Zhang and Guo2021).

Through transcriptomic analysis, our study reveals significant changes in basic metabolism and immune response processes in the gonadal tissues of male and female L. migratoria after P. locustae infection, including amino acid metabolism, carbohydrate metabolism, lipid metabolism, and the involvement of genes such as Transferrin, Hexamerin, Apolipophorin, Toll signalling pathway regulatory proteins, Heat shock proteins, Juvenile hormone-related proteins and enzymes, and Vitellogenin receptor in the immune and reproductive balance of gonadal tissues. These findings are crucial for further elucidating the possible mechanisms underlying the response of L. migratoria gonadal tissues to P. locustae infection, identifying optimal pest control targets, and enhancing the efficacy of P. locustae against locusts.

Supplementary material

The supplementary material for this article can be found at https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007485324000592.

Availability of data and materials

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in this article.

Author contributions

Xuewei Kong carried out the studies, participated in collecting data, in acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data, performed the statistical analysis, participated in experimental design, drafted the manuscript, and participated in paper review and editing. Xinrui Guo participated in collecting data, in acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data, performed the statistical analysis. Hui Liu and Huihui Zhang participated in collecting data. Hongxia Hu, Jun Lin, Wangpeng Shi, Rong Ji, and Roman Jashenko participated in paper review and editing. Han Wang participated in funding acquisition, project administration, supervision, and experimental design, performed the statistical analysis, drafted the manuscript, and participated in paper review and editing.

Financial support

This work was supported by Special Project of Innovation Environment (Talent and Base) Construction in Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region (grant number 2022D04002); Natural Science Foundation in Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region (grant number 2021D01A124); Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region Science and Technology support Xinjiang Project plan (mandatory) project (grant number 2022E02007); and Tianshan Talent Training Program (grant number TSYCLJ0016).

Competing interests

None.

References

Aufauvre, J, Misme-Aucouturier, B, Viguès, B, Texier, C, Delbac, F and Blot, N (2014) Transcriptome analyses of the honeybee response to Nosema ceranae and insecticides. PLoS ONE 9, e91686.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Browne, N, Surlis, C and Kavanagh, K (2014) Thermal and physical stresses induce a short-term immune priming effect in Galleria mellonella larvae. Journal of Insect Physiology 63, 2126.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Budischak, SA, Hansen, CB, Caudron, Q, Garnier, R, Kartzinel, TR, Pelczer, I, Cressler, CE, Leeuwen, A and Graham, AL (2018) Feeding immunity: physiological and behavioral responses to infection and resource limitation. Frontiers in Immunology 8, 1914.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Burmester, T (2015) Expression and evolution of hexamerins from the tobacco hornworm, Manduca sexta, and other Lepidoptera. Insect Biochemistry and Molecular Biology 62, 226234.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chaimanee, V, Chantawannakul, P, Chen, YP, Evans, JD and Pettis, JS (2012) Differential expression of immune genes of adult honey bee (Apis mellifera) after inoculated by Nosema ceranae. Journal of Insect Physiology 58, 10901095.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chen, JX, Shen, J, Song, DL, Zhang, L and Yan, YH (2002) Effect of Nosema locustae on the content of vitellogenin of Locusta migratoria manilensis. Acta Entomologica Sinica 45, 170174.Google Scholar
Chen, LX, Gao, XK, Li, RT, Zhang, LM, Huang, R, Wang, LQ, Song, Y, Xing, ZZ, Liu, T, Nie, XN, Nie, FY, Hua, S, Zhang, ZH, Wang, F, Ma, RLZ and Zhang, L (2020) Complete genome of a unicellular parasite (Antonospora locustae) and transcriptional interactions with its host locust. Microbial Genomics 6, mgen000421.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cui, DN, Tu, XB, Hao, K, Aftab, R, Chen, J, Mark, M and Zhang, ZH (2019) Identification of diapause-associated proteins in migratory locust, Locusta migratoria L. (Orthoptera: Acridoidea) by label-free quantification analysis. Journal of Integrative Agriculture 18, 25792588.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dakhel, WH, Latchininsky, AV and Jaronski, ST (2019) Efficacy of two entomopathogenic fungi, Metarhizium brunneum, Strain F52 alone and combined with Paranosema locustae against the migratory grasshopper, Melanoplus sanguinipes, under laboratory and greenhouse conditions. Insects 10, 94.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Davidson, NM and Oshlack, A (2014) Corset: enabling differential gene expression analysis for de novo assembled transcriptomes. Genome Biology 15, 410.Google ScholarPubMed
Desjardins, CA, Sanscrainte, ND, Goldberg, JM, Heiman, D, Young, S, Zeng, QD, Madhani, HD, Becnel, JJ and Cuomo, CA (2015) Contrasting host–pathogen interactions and genome evolution in two generalist and specialist microsporidian pathogens of mosquitoes. Nature Communications 6, 7121.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dong, LJ, Zhang, XH, Li, YL, Lu, SS and Yin, H (2015) Cloning and expression analysis of a hexamerin gene from Acrida cinerea (Acridoidea: Acrididae). Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology 17, 7884.Google Scholar
Eliautout, R, Dubrana, MP, Vincent-Monégat, C, Vallier, A, Braquart-Varnier, C, Poirie, M, Saillard, C, Heddi, A and Arricau-Bouvery, N (2016) Immune response and survival of Circulifer haematoceps to Spiroplasma citri infection requires expression of the gene hexamerin. Developmental and Comparative Immunology 54, 719.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Games, PD, Alves, SN, Katz, BB, Tomich, JM and Serrao, JE (2016) Differential protein expression in the midgut of Culex quinquefasciatus mosquitoes induced by the insecticide temephos. Medical and Veterinary Entomology 30, 253263.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gao, HL (2016) Effects of imidacloprid treatment on gene expression related to detoxification and defense in Locusta migratori (thesis). Nanjing Agricultural University.Google Scholar
Grabherr, MG, Haas, BJ, Yassour, M, Levin, JZ, Thompson, D, Amit, I, Adiconis, X, Lin, F, Raychowdhury, R, Zeng, QD, Chen, ZH, Mauceli, E, Hacohen, N, Gnirke, A, Rhind, N, Palma, FD, Birren, BW, Nusbaum, C, Lindblad-Toh, K, Friedman, N and Regev, A (2011) Full-length transcriptome assembly from RNA-Seq data without a reference genome. Nature Biotechnology 29, 644652.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hamama, HM, Hussein, MA, Fahmy, AR, Fergani, YA, Mabrouk, AM and Farghaley, SF (2016) A transferrin fragment isolated from the Egyptian cotton leaf worm, Spodoptera littoralis (Boisduval) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) in response to two commercial bioinsecticides. Egyptian Journal of Biological Pest Control 26, 5964.Google Scholar
Hu, YW, Wang, SH, Tang, Y, Xie, GQ, Ding, YJ, Xu, QY, Tang, B, Zhang, L and Wang, SG (2022) Suppression of yolk formation, oviposition and egg quality of locust (Locusta migratoria manilensis) infected by Paranosema locustae. Frontiers in Immunology 13, 848267.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Iatsenko, I, Marra, A, Boquete, JP, Peña, J and Lemaitre, B (2020) Iron sequestration by transferrin 1 mediates nutritional immunity in Drosophila melanogaster. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 117, 73177325.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Iwański, B and Andrejko, M (2023) Changes in the apolipophorin III in Galleria mellonella larvae treated with Pseudomonas aeruginosa exotoxin A. Journal of Insect Physiology 149, 104536.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Janashia, I and Alaux, C (2016) Specific immune stimulation by endogenous bacteria in honey bees (Hymenoptera: Apidae). Journal of Economic Entomology 109, 14741477.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kim, BY and Jin, BR (2015) Apolipophorin III from honeybees (Apis cerana) exhibits antibacterial activity. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part B: Biochemistry and Molecular Biology 182, 613.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kurze, C, Dosselli, R, Grassl, J, Le Conte, Y, Kryger, P, Baer, B and Moritz, RFA (2016) Differential proteomics reveals novel insights into Nosema–honey bee interactions. Insect Biochemistry and Molecular Biology 79, 4249.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lieb, B, Ebner, B and Hartmut, K (2016) cDNA sequences of two arylphorin subunits of an insect biliprotein: phylogenetic differences and gene duplications during evolution of hexamerins – implications for hexamer formation. Journal of Experimental Zoology Part B: Molecular and Developmental Evolution 326, 136148.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Liu, CB, Zhu, JY, Ma, JJ, Zhang, JH, Wang, XL and Zhang, R (2019) A novel hexamerin with an unexpected contribution to the prophenoloxidase activation system of the Chinese oak silkworm, Antheraea pernyi. Archives of Insect Biochemistry and Physiology 103, e21648.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, H, Wei, XJ, Ye, XF, Zhang, HH, Yang, K, Shi, WP, Zhang, JR, Jashenko, R, Ji, R and Hu, HX (2023) The immune response of Locusta migratoria manilensis at different times of infection with Paranosema locustae. Archives of Insect Biochemistry and Physiology 114, e22055.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Love, MI, Huber, W and Anders, S (2014) Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-Seq data with DESeq2. Genome Biology 15, 550.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lv, MY, Mohamed, AA, Zhang, LW, Zhang, PF and Zhang, L (2016) A family of CSαβ defensins and defensin-like peptides from the migratory locust, Locusta migratoria, and their expression dynamics during mycosis and nosemosis. PLoS ONE 11, e0161585.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ma, ZG, Li, CF, Pan, GQ, Li, ZH, Han, B, Xu, JS, Lan, XQ, Chen, J, Yang, DL, Chen, QM, Sang, Q, Ji, XC, Li, T, Long, MX and Zhou, ZY (2013) Genome-wide transcriptional response of silkworm (Bombyx mori) to infection by the microsporidian Nosema bombycis. PLoS ONE 8, e84137.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mao, XZ, Cai, T, Olyarchuk, JG and Wei, LP (2005) Automated genome annotation and pathway identification using the KEGG Orthology (KO) as a controlled vocabulary. Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) 21, 37873793.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Najera, DG, Coca, M, Nutsch, KE and Gorman, MJ (2019) Characterization of a membrane-bound insect transferrin. The FASEB Journal 33, 795.11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Panek, J, El Alaoui, H, Mone, A, Urbach, S, Demettre, E, Texier, C, Brun, C, Zanzoni, A, Peyretaillade, E, Parisot, N, Lerat, E, Peyret, P, Delbac, F and Biron, DG (2014) Hijacking of host cellular functions by an intracellular parasite, the microsporidian Anncaliia algerae. PLoS ONE 9, e100791.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Patnaik, BB, Patnaik, HH, Park, KB, Jo, YH, Le, YS and Han, YS (2015) Silencing of apolipophorin-III causes abnormal adult morphological phenotype and susceptibility to Listeria monocytogenes infection in Tenebrio molitor. Entomological Research 45, 116121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Qian, C, Wang, F, Zhu, BJ, Wei, GQ, Li, S, Liu, CL and Wang, L (2016) Identification and characterization of an Apolipophorin-III gene from Actias selene Hübner (Lepidoptera: Saturniidae). Journal of Asia-Pacific Entomology 19, 103108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rodríguez-García, C, Heerman, MC, Cook, SC, Evans, JD, DeGrandi-Hoffman, G, Banmeke, O, Zhang, Y, Huang, SK, Hamilton, M and Chen, YP (2021) Transferrin-mediated iron sequestration suggests a novel therapeutic strategy for controlling Nosema disease in the honey bee, Apis mellifera. PLoS Pathogens 17, e1009270.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schwenke, RA, Lazzaro, BP and Wolfner, MF (2016) Reproduction-immunity trade-offs in insects. Annual Review of Entomology 61, 239256.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shang, F, Niu, JZ, Ding, BY, Zhang, Q, Ye, C, Zhang, W, Smagghe, G and Wang, JJ (2018) Vitellogenin and its receptor play essential roles in the development and reproduction of the brown citrus aphid, Aphis (Toxoptera) citricidus. Insect Molecular Biology 27, 221233.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stączek, S, Zdybicka-Barabas, A, Wiater, A, Pleszczynska, M and Cytrynska, M (2020) Activation of cellular immune response in insect model host Galleria mellonella by fungal α-1,3-glucan. Pathogens and Disease 78, ftaa062.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tan, WB, Wang, X, Cheng, P, Liu, LJ, Wang, HF, Gong, MQ, Quan, X, Gao, HG and Zhu, CL (2012) Cloning and overexpression of transferrin gene from cypermethrin-resistant Culex pipiens pallens. Parasitology Research 110, 939959.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Trapnell, C, Williams, BA, Pertea, G, Mortazavi, A, Kwan, G, van Baren, MJ, Salzberg, SL, Wold, BJ and Pachter, L (2010) Transcript assembly and abundance estimation from RNA-Seq reveals thousands of new transcripts and switching among isoforms. Nature Biotechnology 28, 511515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vengateswari, G and Shivakumar, MS (2023) Isolation identification and molecular characterization of immune defense proteins from Bacillus thuringiensis challenged Spodoptera litura (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) larvae. Research Journal of Biotechnology 18, 112117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, SH, Liu, XJ, Xia, ZY, Xie, GQ, Tang, B and Wang, SG (2019a) Transcriptome analysis of the molecular mechanism underlying immunity- and reproduction trade-off in Locusta migratoria infected by Micrococcus luteus. PLoS ONE 14, e0211605.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wang, SY, Hu, B, Wei, Q and Su, JY (2019b) Cloning and characterization of hexamerin in Spodoptera exigua and the expression response to insecticide exposure. Journal of Asia-Pacific Entomology 22, 602610.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weber, JJ, Park, YJ and Gorman, M (2020) Secreted insect transferrin-1 with strong and reversible iron-binding has potentially tissue specific roles in immunity and iron transport. The FASEB Journal 34, 1.Google Scholar
Weber, JJ, Brummett, LM, Coca, ME, Tabunoki, H, Kanost, MR, Ragan, EJ, Park, Y and Gorman, MJ (2022) Phenotypic analyses, protein localization, and bacteriostatic activity of Drosophila melanogaster transferrin-1. Insect Biochemistry and Molecular Biology 147, 103811.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wen, DH, Luo, H, Li, TN, Wu, CF, Zhang, JH, Wang, XL and Zhang, R (2017) Cloning and characterization of an insect apolipoprotein (apolipophorin-II/I) involved in the host immune response of Antheraea pernyi. Developmental and Comparative Immunology 77, 221228.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wijeratne, T and Weers, PMM (2019) Lipid-bound apoLp-III is less effective in binding to lipopolysaccharides and phosphatidylglycerol vesicles compared to the lipid-free protein. Molecular and Cellular Biochemistry 458, 6170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wu, WM, Lin, S, Zhao, Z, Su, Y, Li, RL, Zhang, ZD and Guo, XJ (2021) Bombyx mori apolipophorin-III inhibits Beauveria bassiana directly and through regulating expression of genes relevant to immune signaling pathways. Journal of Invertebrate Pathology 184, 107647.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Xu, HH, Hao, ZP, Wang, LF, Li, SJ, Guo, YR and Dang, XL (2020) Suppression of transferrin expression enhances the susceptibility of Plutella xylostella to Isaria cicadae. Insects 11, 281.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Xu, X, Wu, YJ, Yu, B, Meng, XZ, Chen, J, Liu, ZW, Zhong, YJ and Pan, GQ (2023) Transcriptome and immune-related gene function analyses of Antheraea pernyi (Lepidoptera: Saturniidae) eggs infected by Nosema pernyi. Acta Entomologica Sinica 66, 15601569.Google Scholar
Yao, Q, Xu, S, Dong, YZ, Que, YL, Quan, LF and Chen, BX (2018) Characterization of vitellogenin and vitellogenin receptor of Conopomorpha sinensis Bradley and their responses to sublethal concentrations of insecticide. Frontiers in Physiology 9, 1250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young, MD, Wakefield, MJ, Smyth, GK and Oshlack, A (2010) Gene ontology analysis for RNA-Seq: accounting for selection bias. Genome Biology 11, R14.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yu, HZ, Wang, J, Zhang, SZ, Toufeeq, S, Li, B, Li, Z, Yang, LA, Hu, P and Xu, JP (2018) Molecular characterisation of Apolipophorin-III gene in Samia cynthia ricini and its roles in response to bacterial infection. Journal of Invertebrate Pathology 159, 6170.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zafar, J, Huang, JL, Xu, XX and Jin, FL (2022) Analysis of long non-coding RNA-mediated regulatory networks of Plutella xylostella in response to Metarhizium anisopliae infection. Insects 13, 916.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zdybicka-Barabas, A, Sowa-Jasiłek, A, Stączek, S, Jakubowicz, T and Cytrynska, M (2015) Different forms of apolipophorin III in Galleria mellonella larvae challenged with bacteria and fungi. Peptides 68, 105112.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zhang, L and Lecoq, M (2021) Nosema locustae (Protozoa, Microsporidia), a biological agent for locust and grasshopper control. Agronomy 11, 711.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, L, Shang, Q, Lu, Y, Zhao, Q and Gao, X (2015a) A transferrin gene associated with development and 2-tridecanone tolerance in Helicoverpa armigera. Insect Molecular Biology 24, 155166.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zhang, W, Chen, JH, Keyhani, NO, Zhang, ZY, Li, S and Xia, YX (2015b) Comparative transcriptomic analysis of immune responses of the migratory locust, Locusta migratoria, to challenge by the fungal insect pathogen, Metarhizium acridum. BMC Genomics 16, 867.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zhang, Z, Jiao, LL, He, K and Yin, H (2018) Expression and immune functional analysis of hexamerin gene family in Locusta migratoria (Acridoidea: Oedipodidae). Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology 20, 4551.Google Scholar
Zhang, H, Xu, N, Cao, LR, Wang, R and Zhang, K (2023a) Review on research and utilization of microbial pesticides in China. Chinese Journal of Pesticide Science 25, 769778.Google Scholar
Zhang, HH, Yang, K, Wang, H, Liu, H, Shi, WP, Kabak, I, Ji, R and Hu, HX (2023b) Molecular and biochemical changes in Locusta migratoria (Orthoptera: Acrididae) infected with Paranosema locustae. Journal of Insect Science 23, 18.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Figure 0

Table 1. Transcriptome assembly results for L. migratoria

Figure 1

Figure 1. Histogram analysis of the number of DEGs between samples in ovary (A) and testis (B) of L. migratoria. After infection with P. locustae, ovary tissues of L. migratoria had the most DEGs at 1 day post-eclosion, while testis tissues had the most DEGs at 9 day post-eclosion.

Figure 2

Figure 2. Venn diagrams analysis illustrated the overlap of DEGs among different comparison groups in ovary (A) and testis (B). After infection with P. locustae, there were 25 common DEGs in female ovary groups and 205 common DEGs in male testis groups.

Figure 3

Figure 3. Dot plot of top 20 ranked GO terms of DEGs in different stages of female ovary of L. migratoria. The figures represent the CFn3 vs. TFn3, CF1 vs. TF1, CF9 vs. TF9, CF19 vs. TF19, respectively. The vertical axis indicates GO terms and the horizontal axis represents the gene ratio. The size of dots indicates the number of genes in the GO term, and the colour of the dots corresponds to different Padj ranges.

Figure 4

Figure 4. Dot plot of top 20 ranked GO terms of DEGs in different stages of male testis of L. migratoria. The figures represent the CMn3 vs. TMn3, CM1 vs. TM1, CM9 vs. TM9, CM19 vs. TM19, respectively. The vertical axis indicates GO terms and the horizontal axis represents the gene ratio. The size of dots indicates the number of genes in the GO term, and the colour of the dots corresponds to different Padj ranges.

Figure 5

Figure 5. KEGG analysis of DEGs in different stages of female ovary of L. migratoria. The figures represent the KEGG pathway for the CFn3 vs. TFn3, CF1 vs. TF1, CF9 vs. TF9, CF19 vs. TF19, respectively. The vertical axis represents the pathway name, and the horizontal axis represents the gene ratio. The size of the dots indicates the number of genes in the pathway, and the colour of the dots corresponds to different Padj ranges.

Figure 6

Figure 6. KEGG analysis of DEGs in different stages of male testis of L. migratoria. The figures represent the KEGG pathway for the CMn3 vs. TMn3, CM1 vs. TM1, CM9 vs. TM9, CM19 vs. TM19, respectively. The vertical axis represents the pathway name, and the horizontal axis represents the gene ratio. The size of the dots indicates the number of genes in the pathway, and the colour of the dots corresponds to different Padj ranges.

Figure 7

Figure 7. Network of PPI for DEGs. The figures represent the PPI analysis of DEGs in CF1 vs. TF1, CF9 vs. TF9, CM1 vs. TM1, CM9 vs. TM9, respectively. Nodes represent DEGs, and edges represent interactions between two DEGs. The rhombi represent DEGs related to immunity, the triangles represent DEGs related to reproduction; the circles represent DEGs related to immunity and reproduction. Red and blue represent an upward adjustment and a downward adjustment, respectively.

Figure 8

Table 2. Part of DEGs related to immunity and reproduction in gonadal tissue

Figure 9

Figure 8. Relative expression levels of three unigenes, including Tsf, Hex1, and ApoLp-III among different stages of ovary and testis in L. migratoria. Columns and polylines indicate the relative expression levels of genes identified by qRT-PCR and RNA-Seq, respectively. EF1α-F was used as an internal control. The details of the primers are shown in table S1. Data are expressed as mean ± SE (n = 3). Asterisks above columns indicate statistically significant differences by one-way ANOVA with Duncan's test (P < 0.05). n3 indicates third-instar locust nymphs. 1, 9, and 19 indicate 1, 9, and 19 days adult after emergence, respectively.

Supplementary material: File

Kong et al. supplementary material 1

Kong et al. supplementary material
Download Kong et al. supplementary material 1(File)
File 470.4 KB
Supplementary material: File

Kong et al. supplementary material 2

Kong et al. supplementary material
Download Kong et al. supplementary material 2(File)
File 56.8 KB
Supplementary material: File

Kong et al. supplementary material 3

Kong et al. supplementary material
Download Kong et al. supplementary material 3(File)
File 23 KB