Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T07:21:11.218Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Toxicity and Interaction of Stereo-isomers of Benzene Hexachloride in Cockroaches

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

K. van Aspbren
Affiliation:
Laboratory for Research on Biocides,National Council for Agricultural Research, Utrecht.

Extract

Some types of joint action of insecticides described by previous authors are discussed, and experiments described on the joint action on Periplaneta americana (L.) of the γ and δ isomers, and of the γ and α isomers, of benzene hexachloride. The values of the mortalities obtained are given in tables and compared with calculations of those that would be expected according to several models of joint action in which no interaction occurs. From statistical evidence it is concluded that only one of these models, namely, independent action with a strong positive correlation of the susceptibilities to the two poisons, can give an appropriate explanation of the results. These results, however, can also be explained by suggesting that antagonistic effects play a part in the joint action of the BHC isomers investigated.

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1956

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Van Aspeben, K. (1954 a)Arch. int. Pharmacodyn., 99, pp. 368377.Google Scholar
Van Aspeeen, K. (1954 b). Meded. LandbHogesch. Gent., 19, pp. 536545.Google Scholar
Dixon, W. J. & Massey, F. J. (1951). Introduction to statistical analysis.—New York, McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Mcnamara, B. P. & Krop, S. (1948 a). J. Pharmacol., 92, pp. 140146.Google Scholar
Mcnamara, B. P. & Krop, S. (1948 b). J. Pharmacol., 92, pp. 147152.Google Scholar
Plackett, R. L. & Hewlett, P. S. (1952). J. E. statist. Soc., (B) 14, pp. 141163.Google Scholar