Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-18T15:47:41.584Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Temperature-related fitness costs of resistance to spinosad in the diamondback moth, Plutella xylostella (Lepidoptera: Plutelidae)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 November 2007

Z.M. Li ,
S.S. Liu ,
Y.Q. Liu  and
G.Y. Ye
Z.M. Li
Affiliation:
Institute of Insect Sciences, Zhejiang University, 268 Kaixuan Road, Hangzhou 310029, China
S.S. Liu*
Affiliation:
Institute of Insect Sciences, Zhejiang University, 268 Kaixuan Road, Hangzhou 310029, China
Y.Q. Liu
Affiliation:
Institute of Insect Sciences, Zhejiang University, 268 Kaixuan Road, Hangzhou 310029, China
G.Y. Ye
Affiliation:
Institute of Insect Sciences, Zhejiang University, 268 Kaixuan Road, Hangzhou 310029, China
*
*Author for correspondence Fax: +86 571 86049815 E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Fitness costs associated with resistance genes expressed in the absence of insecticides affect the evolution of insecticide resistance and the outcome of resistance management programmes. However, measurements of fitness costs may not be straightforward as they vary with environmental conditions. The diamondback moth, Plutella xylostella L. (Lepidoptera: Plutellidae), has developed resistance to spinosad, the first insecticide of the Naturalyte class, after only a few years of field application of this product. In this study, we compared the performance of two homogenous strains of P. xylostella, one susceptible (SS) and the other resistant (RR) to spinosad at an unfavourable, low natural temperature regime, a favourable median-fluctuating temperature regime and an unfavourable high-fluctuating temperature regime. The RR strain showed only marginal fitness cost at the median temperature regime. At the low temperature regime, the RR strain failed to produce any viable offspring, while the SS strain achieved positive population growth. At the high temperature regime, the RR strain showed a 33% decrease in intrinsic rate of increase compared to the SS strain. The results demonstrate that fitness costs of resistance to spinosad are temperature-dependent, increasing in scale at unfavourably low and high temperatures; costs were particularly high at low temperatures. Suggestions for designing effective management programmes are made to delay or avoid development of resistance to spinosad by P. xylostella under different temperature conditions.

Keywords

insecticide resistancefitness costPlutella xylostellaspinosadtemperature
Type
Research Article
Information
Bulletin of Entomological Research , Volume 97 , Issue 6 , December 2007 , pp. 627 - 635
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agnew, P., Berticat, C., Bedhomme, S., Sidobre, C. & Michalakis, Y. (2004) Parasitism increases and decreases the costs of insecticide resistance in mosquitoes. Evolution 58, 579–586.Google ScholarPubMed
Alyokhin, A.V. & Ferro, D.N. (1999) Relative fitness of Colorado potato beetle (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) resistant and susceptible to the Bacillus thuringiensis Cry3A toxin. Journal of Economic Entomology 92, 510–515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arnaud, L., Brostaux, Y., Assiè, L.K., Gaspar, C. & Haubruge, E. (2002) Increased fecundity of malathion-specific resistant beetles in absence of insecticide pressure. Heredity 89, 425–429.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Arnaud, L., Haubruge, E. & Gage, M.J.G. (2005) The malathion-specific resistance gene confers s sperm competition advantage in Tribolium castaneum. Functional Ecology 19, 1032–1039.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berticat, C., Duron, O., Heyse, D. & Raymond, M. (2004) Insecticide resistance genes confer a predation cost on mosquitoes, Culex pipiens. Genetical Research 83, 189–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carrière, Y., Deland, J-P., Roff, D.A. & Vincent, C. (1994) Life-history costs associated with the evolution of insecticide resistance. Proceedings of the Royal Society Series B 258, 35–40.Google Scholar
Carrière, Y., Roff, D.A. & Deland, J.-P. (1995) The joint evolution of diapause and insecticide resistance: a test of an optimality model. Ecology 76, 1497–1505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carrière, Y., Christa Ellers-Kirk, C., Patin, A.L., Sims, M.A., Meyer, S., Liu, Y.B., Dennehy, T.J. & Tabashnik, B.E. (2001) Overwintering cost associated with resistance to transgenic cotton in the pink bollworm (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae). Journal of Economic Entomology 94, 935–941.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chen, X.D. & Nakasuji, F. (2004) Dimished egg size in fenvalerate resistant strains of the diamondback moth Plutella xylostella (Lepidoptera: Yponomeutidae). Applied Entomology and Zoology 39, 335–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chevillon, C., Denis Bourguet, D., Rousset, F.O., Pasteur, N. & Raymond, M. (1997) Pleiotropy of adaptive changes in populations: comparisons among insecticide resistance genes in Culex pipiens. Genetical Research 70, 195–204.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Coustau, C., Chevillon, C. & ffrench-Constant, R.H. (2000) Resistance to xenobiotics and parasites: can we count the cost? Trends in Ecology and Evolution 15, 378–383.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ferguson, J.S. (2004) Development and stability of insecticide resistance in the leafminer Liriomyza trifolii (Diptera: Agromyzidae) to cyromazine, abmectin, and spinosad. Journal of Economic Entomology 97, 112–119.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Foster, S.P., Harrington, R., Devonshire, A.L., Denholm, I., Clark, S.J. & Mugglestone, M.A. (1997) Evidence for a possible fitness trade-off between insecticide resistance and the low temperature movement that is essential for survival of UK populations of Myzus persicae (Hemiptera: Aphididae). Bulletin of Entomological Research 87, 573–579.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foster, S.P., Denholm, I. & Devonshire, A.L. (2000) The ups and downs of insecticide resistance in peach-potato aphids (Myzus persicae) in the UK. Crop Protection 19, 873–879.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foster, S.P., Harrington, R., Dewar, A.M., Denholm, I. & Devonshire, A.L. (2002) Temporal and spatial dynamics of insecticide resistance in Myzus persicae (Hemiptera: Aphididae). Pest Management Science 58, 895–907.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Foster, S.P., Denholm, I., Thompson, R., Poppy, G.M. & Powell, W. (2005) Reduced response of insecticide-resistant aphids and attraction of parasitoids to aphid alarm pheromone: a potential fitness trade-off. Bulletin of Entomological Research 95, 37–46.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Groeters, F.R., Tabashnik, T.E., Finson, N. & Johnson, M.W. (1994) Fitness costs of resistance to Bacillus thuringiensis in the diamondback moth (Plutella xylostella). Evolution 48, 197–201.Google ScholarPubMed
Janmaat, A.F. & Myers, J.H. (2005) The cost of resistance to Bacillus thuringiensis varies with the host plant of Trichoplusisa ni. Proceedings of the Royal Society Series B 272, 1031–1038.Google ScholarPubMed
Krebs, C.J. (2001) Ecology: Experimental Analysis of Distribution and Abundance. Chapters 9–10, San Francisco, Benjamin Cummings.Google Scholar
Li, T.W., Gao, X.W., Zheng, B.Z. & Liang, P. (2000) Study on genetics of avermectins resistance and population genetics in Plutella xylostella. Acta Entomologica Sinica 43, 255–263.Google Scholar
Li, Z.M. (2005) Improving artificial selection of insecticide resistance in the parasitoid Cotesia plutellae: integrating host resistance into the selection process. PhD thesis, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.Google Scholar
Liu, S.S., Chen, F.Z. & Zalucki, M.P. (2002) Development and survival of the diamondback moth (Lepidoptera: Plutellidae) at constant and alternating temperatures. Environmental Entomology 31, 221–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKenzie, J.A. (1990) Selection at the dieldrin resistance locus in overwintering populations of Lucilia cuprina (Wiedemann). Australian Journal of Zoology 38, 493–501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raymond, B., Sayyed, A.H. & Wright, D.J. (2005) Genes and environment interact to determine the fitness cost of resistance to Bacillus thuringiensis. Proceedings of the Royal Society Series B 272, 1519–1524.Google ScholarPubMed
Roush, R.T. & McKenzie, J.A. (1987) Ecological genetics of insecticide and acaricide resistance. Annual Review of Entomology 32, 361–380.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sayyed, A.H. & Wright, D.J. (2001) Fitness costs and stability of resistance to Bacillus thuringiensis in a field population of the diamondback moth Plutella xylostella L. Ecological Entomology 26, 502–508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sayyed, A.H., Omar, D. & Wright, D.J. (2004) Genetics of spinosad resistance in a multi-resistant field selected population of Plutella xylostella. Pest Management Science 60, 827–832.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shono, T. & Scott, J.G. (2003) Spinosad resistance in the housefly, Musca domestica, is due to a recessive factor on autosome 1. Pesticide Biochemistry and Physiology 75, 1–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
StatSoft, Inc. (2003). STATISTICA for Windows, version 6. Tulsa, OK, StatSoft, Inc.Google Scholar
Su, X.Y. & Lin, C.S. (1986) Modelling population dynamics of Mythimna separate. Acta Ecologica Sinica 6, 65–73.Google Scholar
Tabashnik, B.E., Cushing, N.L., Finson, N. & Johnson, M.W. (1990) Field development of resistance to Bacillus thuringiensis in diamondback moth (Lepidoptera: Plutellidae). Journal of Economic Entomology 83, 1671–1676.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tabashnik, B.E., Dennehy, T.J. & Carrière, Y. (2005) Delayed resistance to transgenic cotton in pink bollworm. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science USA 102, 15389–15393.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Talekar, N.S. & Shelton, A.M. (1993) Biology, ecology, and management of the diamondback moth. Annual Review of Entomology 38, 275–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tang, J.D., Gilboa, S., Roush, R.T. & Shelton, A.M. (1997) Inheritance, stability, and lack-of-fitness costs of field-selected resistance to Bacillus thuringiensis in diamondback moth (Lepidoptera: Plutellidae) from Florida. Journal of Economic Entomology 90, 732–741.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, G.D., Dutton, R. & Sparks, T.C. (2000) Spinosad – a case study: an example from a natural products discovery programme. Pest Management Science 56, 696–702.3.0.CO;2-5>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, T., Valle, J. & Vinuela, E. (2003) Is the naturally derived insecticide spinosad® compatible with insect natural enemies. Biocontrol Science and Technology 13, 459–475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wyss, C.F., Young, H.P., Shukla, J. & Roe, R.M. (2003) Biology and genetics of a laboratory strain of the tobacco budworm, Heliothis virescens (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae), highly resistant to spinosad. Crop Protection 22, 307–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yamada, K., Tanaka, T., Fahmy, A.R. & Miyata, T. (1993) Laboratory evaluation of the biological fitness of chlorfluazuron resistant and susceptible strains from the same origin of the diamondback moth Plutella xylostella. Applied Entomology and Zoology 28, 396–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yang, J., Li, Z.M., Liu, Y.Q. & Liu, S.S. (2004) Comparison of low temperature tolerance between spinosad resistant and susceptible strains of diamondback moth. Chinese Journal of Pesticide Science 6, 25–31.Google Scholar
Young, H.P., Bailey, W.D. & Roe, R.M. (2003) Spinosad selection of a laboratory strain of the tobacco budworm, Heliothis virescens (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae), and characterization of resistance. Crop Protection 22, 265–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhao, J.Z., Li, Y.X., Collins, H.L., Gusukuma-Minuto, L., Mau, R.F.L., Thompson, G.D. & Shelton, A.M. (2002) Monitoring and characterization of diamondback moth (Lepidoptera: Plutellidae) resistance to spinosad. Journal of Economic Entomology 95, 430–436.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zhao, J.Z., Collins, H.L., Li, Y.X., Mau, R.F.L., Thompson, G.D., Hertlein, M.B., Andaloro, J.T., Boykin, R. & Shelton, A.M. (2006) Monitoring of diamondback moth (Lepidoptera: Plutellidae) resistance to spinosad, indoxacarb and emamectin benzoate. Journal of Economic Entomology 99, 176–181.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed