Hostname: page-component-cc8bf7c57-ksm4s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-11T23:01:03.264Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The susceptibility of cocoa to mealybugs (Pseudococcidae) and other honeydew-producing Homoptera in Ghana

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

C.A.M. Campbell
Affiliation:
Cocoa Research Institute, P.O. Box 8, New Tafo, Ghana

Abstract

Population densities of mealybugs and other honeydew-producing Homoptera were assessed in six cocoa (Theobroma cacao Linnaeus) trials by inspecting trees from ground to eye level, and also by dissecting samples of terminal buds. A total of 68 cocoa progenies was examined, mainly inter-crosses of six clones. Progenies differed in their levels of infestation with total mealybugs, Planococcoides njalensis (Laing), Planococcus citri (Risso), Phenacoccus hargreavesi (Laing), (Pseudococcidae), Toxoptera aurantii (Boyer de Fonscolombe) (Aphididae), and Mesohomotoma tessmanni (Aulmann) (Psyllidae). Crosses with Amelonado or T63/971 were generally more densely infested with mealybugs than those for example of NA34 and T63/967. Trees of T17/524 parentage were sparsely infested with mealybugs. Rankings of progenies by infestation with mealybugs from the two different sampling procedures were positively correlated, but the relative abundances of individual mealybug species on the trunk and in the canopy differed. Several species of mealybug found in buds were either rare or never found by inspecting trees up to eye level. Correlations between rankings of progenies by order of abundance of Planococcoides njalensis and Planococcus citri were positive and statistically significant, as were those between mealybugs and infestation of buds by T. aurantii or M. tessmanni. The above rankings were negatively correlated with those by aphid and psyllid abundance assessed from inspecting trees up to eye level. The two sampling procedures were complementary but, for economy, samples of buds gave the clearest indication of a progeny's suitability for mealybugs.

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Attafuah, A. & Glendinning, D.R. (1965) Studies on resistance and tolerance to cocoa viruses in Ghana. Annals of Applied Biology 56, 219225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bigger, M. (1975a) Varietal susceptibility to attack by cocoa insects, pp. 170175in: Kumar, R. (Ed.) Proceedings of the 4th Conference of West African Cocoa Entomologists, 9–13th December, 1974. Legon, Ghana, Zoology Department, University of Ghana.Google Scholar
Bigger, M. (1975b) Susceptibility of two cocoa progenies to attack by insect species. II. Effects of canopy size on numbers of mealybugs. Experimental Agriculture 11, 187192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bigger, M. (1981a) Observations on the insect fauna of shaded and unshaded Amelonado cocoa. Bulletin of Entomological Research 71, 107119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bigger, M. (1981b) The relative abundance of the mealybug vectors (Hemiptera: Coccidae and Pseudococcidae) of cocoa swollen shoot disease in Ghana. Bulletin of Entomological Research 71, 435448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, C.A.M. (1984) The influence of overhead shade and fertilizers on the Homoptera of mature Upper-Amazon cocoa trees in Ghana. Bulletin of Entomological Research 74, 163174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conover, W.J. (1980) Practical nonparametric statistics 2nd Edition493 pp. New York, Wiley.Google Scholar
Decazy, B. (1979) Note preliminaire sur l'ecologie du psylle du cacaoyer: Tyora tessmanni (Aulm.) (Homoptere Psyllidae), pp. 8392in: Mbondji, M. & Decazy, B. (Eds) Rapport de Synthese VcmeConference des Entomologistes du Cacaoyer de I'Ouest-Africain, 13–18 Décembre, 1976. Onarest, B.P. Yaoundé, Cameroun.Google Scholar
De Mire, P.B. (1975) Comportement de cultivars de cacaoyers à l'égard des attaques d'homoptères, pp. 176180in: Kumar, R. (Ed.) Proceedings of the 4th Conference of West African Cocoa Entomologists, 9–13th December, 1974. Legon, Ghana, Zoology Department, University of Ghana.Google Scholar
Firempong, S. (1982) The performance of Planococcoides njalensis (Homoptera: Pseudococcidae) on some cocoa cultivars, pp. 100101in: Tests of agrochemicals and cultivars, 3. Annals of Applied Biology 100 (suppl.), 112 pp.Google Scholar
Firempong, S. (1984) Laboratory and field evaluation of cocoa progenies for resistance to mealybug vectors (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae) of swollen shoot virus. Bulletin of Entompological Research 74, 97102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Legg, J.T. & Lockwood, G. (1981) Resistance of cocoa to swollen-shoot virus in Ghana. I. Field trials. Annals of Applied Biology 97, 7589.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lockwood, G. (1981a) Resistance of cocoa to swollen-shoot virus in Ghana. II. Assessment of seed inoculation experiments. Annals of Applied Biology 97, 9197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lockwood, G. (1981b) Cocoa breeding in Ghana with reference to swollen-shoot disease, pp. 407413in: de Lafforest, J. (Ed.) Proceedings of the 7th International Cocoa Research Conference, Douala, Cameroun 7–12th November, 1979. Douala, Cameroun.Google Scholar
Pimentel Gomes, F. (1970) An extension of the method of joint analysis of experiments in complete randomised blocks. Biometrics 26, 332336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roivainen, O. (1976) Transmission of cocoa viruses by mealybugs (Homoptera: Pseudococcidae). Journal of the Scientific Agricultural Society of Finland 48, 203304.Google Scholar
Strickland, A.H. (1951) The entomology of swollen shoot of cacao. I-The insect species involved, with notes on their biology. Bulletin of Entomological Research 41, 725748.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thresh, J.M., Owusu, G.K., Boamah, A. & Lockwood, G. (1988) Ghanaian cocoa varieties and swollen shoot virus. Crop Protection 7, 219231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar