Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T15:39:11.242Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Studies on the oviposition of Rhyzopertha dominica (F.) in rice and paddy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

Michael H. Breese
Affiliation:
Regional Research Centre, Imperial College of Tropical Agriculture, Trinidad, W.I.

Extract

No reduction in the amount of feeding or in the oviposition rate was observed when females of Rhyzopertha dominica (F.) were supplied with whole rather than with cut wheat grains. Although there was a marked reduction in feeding when females were supplied with cut grains of paddy and a further reduction when they were supplied with cut grains of hulled rice, the oviposition rate observed on these two types of grain was only slightly lower than on wheat.

The difference in the oviposition rates observed on wheat and rice may be due to a difference in the nutritional values of these grains or it is possible that the harder texture of the rice kernel limits the feeding rate of the female sufficiently to affect the rate of egg production.

Eggs are laid preferably in crevices and on rough surfaces rather than on smooth, and these preferences often overweigh the tendency shown by the female to avoid laying on the grain on which it is feeding.

The results of experiments on egg distribution in paddy are in agreement with Crombie's (1942) observation that females of R. dominica tend to lay all the eggs for a given day in one short period of intense ovipositing activity. Thus, although suitable oviposition sites may be numerous, if they are individually able to accommodate all the eggs laid on one day, eggs will usually be concentrated in fewer oviposition sites than are available.

Type
Research Paper
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1963

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Birch, L. C. (1945). The influence of temperature, humidity and density on the oviposition of the small strain of Calandra oryzae L. and Rhizopertha dominica Fab. (Coleoptera).—Aust. J. exp. Biol med Sci. 23 pp. 197203.Google Scholar
Breese, M. H. (1960). The infestibility of stored paddy by Sitophilus sasakii (Tak.) and Rhyzopertha dominica (F.).—Bull. ent. Res. 51 pp. 599630.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Breese, M. H. (1961 a). The development and oviposition of Oryzaephilus spp. on unrefined sugars.—Bull. ent. Res. 52 pp. 716.Google Scholar
Breese, M. H. (1961 b). Combine harvesting rice in the tropics. Progress or problems?World Crops 13 pp. 376379.Google Scholar
Crombie, A. C. (1941). On oviposition, olfactory conditioning and host selection in Rhizopertha dominica Fab. (Insecta, Coleoptera).—J. exp. Biol. 18 pp. 6279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crombie, A. C. (1942). The effect of crowding upon the oviposition of grain-infesting insects.—J. exp. Biol. 19 pp. 311340.Google Scholar
Dick, J. (1937). Oviposition in certain Coleoptera.—Ann. appl. Biol. 24 pp. 762796.Google Scholar
Gay, F. J. & Ratcliffe, F. N. (1941). The importance of Rhizopertha dominica as a pest of wheat under wartime storage conditions.—J. Coun. sci. industr. Res. Aust. 14 pp. 173180.Google Scholar
Howe, R. W. (1950). The development of Rhizopertha dominica (F.) (Col., Bostrichidae) under constant conditions.—Ent. mon. Mag. 86 pp. 15.Google Scholar
Laubmann, M. (1959). Der Einfluss von Länge, Breite und Materialbeschaffenheit von Spalten auf die Eiablage des Getreidekapuziners, Rhizopertha dominica Fab.—Anz. Schädlingsk. 32 pp. 161—166.Google Scholar