Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T16:05:03.140Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Studies on disruption of sexual communication in the pink bollworm, Pectinophora gossypiella (Saunders) (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae), with microencapsulated gossyplure or its component Z, Z-isomer

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

H. M. Flint  and
J. R. Merkle
H. M. Flint
Affiliation:
Western Cotton Research Laboratory, USDA, ARS, Phoenix, Arizona 85040, USA
J. R. Merkle
Affiliation:
Western Cotton Research Laboratory, USDA, ARS, Phoenix, Arizona 85040, USA
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Microencapsulated gossyplure or its component Z,Z-isomer were applied to 0·04-ha field plots in Arizona for disruption of sexual communication in adults of Pectinophora gossypiella (Saund.). In an initial efficacy test, the materials were placed on cotton plants in 50-μl drops by hand at a rate of 3·7 g a.i./ha (24 690 drops/ha). Trap catches were reduced by averages of 92 and 81% for the Z,Z-isomer or gossyplure treatments, respectively, during a one-week test period. Mating in mini-mating stations was reduced by 100 and 91% for Z,Z-isomer and gossyplure treatments, respectively. In a further test, sprays were applied using a Micron Herbi 77 hand-held spinning disc applicator that was calibrated to deliver 1·97 × 108 spray droplets/ha (about 250 μm in diameter and 0·01 μl/drop). The spray and drop methods were used to apply rates of 2·5 or 12·3 g a.i./ha of both materials to 0·04-ha field plots. The 12·3 g/ha rate of microencapsulated materials was necessary to give about 90% reductions in trap catches for the 9–12–day test periods. Gossyplure and its Z,Z-isomer gave similar reductions in catches when the same rates and method of application were used. However, comparisons of results for 50-μl drops vs. spray indicated that the drops generally resulted in significantly lower trap catches than sprays at the 2·5 g/ha dose rate. The results indicate that spray application of microencapsulated gossyplure or its Z,Z-isomer have potential for communication disruption of P. gossypiella.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Bulletin of Entomological Research , Volume 74 , Issue 1 , March 1984 , pp. 25 - 32
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1984

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Brooks, T. W. (1979). Vegetable and field crops. Pink bollworm, Pectinophora gossypiella.— pp. 80–87in Roelofs, W. L. (Ed.). Establishing efficacy of sex attractants and disruptants for insect control.—97 pp. College Park, Maryland, Ent. Soc. America.Google Scholar
Brooks, T. W., Doane, C. C. & Staten, R. T. (1979). Experience with the first commercial pheromone communication disruptive for suppression of an agricultural insect pest.— pp. 375–388in Ritter, F. J. (Ed.). Chemical ecology: odour communication in animals.— 427 pp. Amsterdam, Elsevier/North Holland.Google Scholar
Cardé, R. T. (1981). Disruption of long-distance pheromone communication in the oriental fruit moth: camouflaging the natural aerial trails from females?—pp. 385–401in Mitchell, E. R. (Ed.). Management of insect pests with semiochemicals.—514 pp. New York, Plenum Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campion, D. G., McVeigh, L. J., Hunter-Jones, P., Hall, D. R., Lester, R., Nesbitt, B. F., Marrs, G. J. & Alder, M. R. (1981). Evaluation of microencapsulated formulations of pheromone components of the Egyptian cotton leafworm in Crete.—pp. 253–265in Mitchell, E. R. (Ed.). Management of insect pests with semiochemicals.—514 pp. New York, Plenum Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doane, C. C. & Brooks, T. W. (1981). Research and development of pheromones for insect control with emphasis on the pink bollworm.—pp. 285–303in Mitchell, E. R. (Ed.). Management of insect pests with semiochemicals.—514 pp. New York, Plenum Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flint, H. M., Smith, R. L., Bariola, L. A., Horn, B. R., Forey, D. E. & Kuhn, S. J. (1976). Pink bollworm: trap tests with gossyplure.—J. econ. Ent. 69, 535–538.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flint, H. M., Butler, L., McDonough, L. M., Smith, R. L. & Forey, D. E. (1978). Pink bollworm: response to various emission rates of gossyplure in the field.—Environ. Entomol. 7, 57–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flint, H. M. & Merkle, J. R. (1983). Pink bollworm (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae): communication disruption by pheromone composition imbalance.—J. econ. Ent. 76, 40–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foster, R. N., Staten, R. T. & Miller, E. (1977). Evaluation of traps for pink bollworm.—J. econ. Ent. 70, 289–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaston, L. K., Kaae, R. S., Shorey, H. H. & Sellers, D. (1977). Controlling the pink bollworm by disrupting sex pheromone communication between adult moths.—Science, N.Y. 196, 904–905.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gillespie, J. M., Henneberry, T. J., Zvirgzdins, A. & Starner, W. N. Jr,. (1982). Mating disruption with gossyplure. Proceedings of the 1982 Beltwide Cotton Production Research Conferences.—302 pp. Memphis, Tennessee, Nat. Cott. Coun. America.Google Scholar
Hirano, C. (1979). (Z)-9-tetradecenyl acetate as a potent inhibitor of attraction of Spodoptera litura (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) to synthetic sex pheromone.—Protection Ecology 1, 171–177.Google Scholar
Lingren, P. D., Raulston, J. R., Sparks, A. N. & Wolf, W. W. (1982). Insect monitoring technology for evaluation of suppression via pheromone systems.—pp. 171–193in Kydonieus, A. F. & Beroza, M. (Eds.). Insect suppression with controlled release systems. Volume I.—274 pp. Boca Raton, Florida, CRC Press.Google Scholar
Marks, R. J., Hall, D. R., Lester, R., Nesbitt, B. F. & Lambert, M. R. K. (1981). Further studies on mating disruption of the red bollworm, Diparopsis castanea Hampson (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae), with a microencapsulated mating inhibitor.—Bull. ent. Res. 71, 403–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Minks, A. K., Voerman, S. & Klun, J. A. (1976). Disruption of pheromone communication with micro-encapsulated antipheromones against Adoxophyes orana.—Entomologia exp. appl. 20, 163–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nakasun, F. & Fujita, K. (1980). A population model to assess the effect of sex pheromones on population suppression.—Appl. Entomol. & Zool. 15, 27–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plimmer, J. R. (1981). Formulation and regulation: constraints on the development of semiochemicals for insect pest management.—pp. 403–420in Mitchell, E. R. (Ed.). Management of insect pests with semiochemicals.—514 pp. New York, Plenum Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plimmer, J. R. (1982). Disruption of mating in the gypsy moth.—pp. 135–154in Kydonieus, A. F. & Beroza, M. (Eds.). Insect suppression with controlled release pheromone systems. Volume II—312 pp. Boca Raton, Florida, CRC Press.Google Scholar
Rothschild, G. H. L. (1981). Mating disruption of lepidopterous pests: current status and future prospects.—pp. 207–228in Mitchell, E. R. (Ed.). Management of insect pests with semiochemicals.—514 pp. New York, Plenum Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sanders, C. J. (1976). Disruption of sex attraction in the eastern spruce budworm.—Environ. Entomol. 5, 868–872.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sanders, C. J. (1982). Disruption of male spruce budworm orientation to calling females in a wind tunnel by synthetic pheromone.—J. Chem. Ecol. 8, 493–506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shorey, H. H., Gaston, L. K. & Kaae, R. S. (1976). Air-permeation with gossyplure for control of the pink bollworm.—pp. 67–74in Beroza, M. (Ed.). Pest management with insect sex attractants and other behavior-controlling chemicals.—192 pp. Washington, D.C., Am. Chem. Soc.CrossRefGoogle Scholar