Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-04T19:49:15.100Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The specific Status of Callosobruchus maculatus (F.) and Callosobruchus analis (F.)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

B. J. Southgate ,
R. W. Howe  and
G. A. Brett
B. J. Southgate
Affiliation:
Department of Scientific & Industrial Research, Pest Infestation Laboratory
R. W. Howe
Affiliation:
Department of Scientific & Industrial Research, Pest Infestation Laboratory
G. A. Brett
Affiliation:
Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries & Food, Infestation Control Division.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Two of the species in Callosobruchus, C. maculatus (F.) and C. analis (F.), are compared and redescribed, together with a description of the male and female genitalia of both species. The species Bruchus vicinus Gylh., B. ornatus Boh., B. ambiguus Gylh., B. sinuatus Fhs. and B. quadrimaculatus F. are shown to be synonymous with C. maculatus (F.). Bruchus jekeli Allib. and B. glaber Allib. are almost certainly synonyms of C. analis (F.), but this could not be verified as no type specimens are available.

Type
Research Paper
Information
Bulletin of Entomological Research , Volume 48 , Issue 1 , March 1957 , pp. 79 - 89
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1957

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allibert, A. (1847). Note sur divers insectes Coléoptères…—Rev. Zool., Paris, 10, pp. 15, 16.Google Scholar
Boheman, C. H. (1829). Novae Coleopterorum species.—Nouv. Mém. Soc. Nat. Moscou, 1, p. 103.Google Scholar
Bridwell, J. C. (1929). The Cowpea Bruchid (Coleoptera) under another name —a plea for one kind of entomological specialist.—Proc. ent. Soc. Wash., 31, pp. 39–44.Google Scholar
Bridwell, J. C. (1938). Specularius erythrinae, a new Bruchid affecting seeds of Erythrina (Coleoptera).—J. Wash. Acad. Sci., 28, pp. 69–76.Google Scholar
Decelle, J. E. (1951). Contribution à l'étude des Bruchidae du Congo belge (Col. Phytophaga).—Rev. Zool. Bot. afr., 45, pp. 172–192.Google Scholar
Fabricius, J. C. (1775). Systema entomologiae, p. 659.Google Scholar
Fabricius, J. C. (1781). Species insectorum, 1, p. 75.Google Scholar
Fabricius, J. C. (1792). Entomologia systematica, 1, B, p. 371.Google Scholar
Fabricius, J. C. (1801). Systema Eleutheratorum, 2, pp. 402–403.Google Scholar
Herford, G. M. (1935). A key to the members of the family Bruchidae (Col.) of economic importance in Europe.—Trans. Soc. Brit. Ent., 2, pp. 1–32.Google Scholar
Hoffmann, A. (1945). Coleéoptèrges Bruchides et Anthribides.—Faune Fr., 44, 184 pp. Paris, Lechevalier.Google Scholar
Horn, G. H. (1873). Revision of the Bruchidae of the United States.—Trans. Amer. ent. Soc., 4, pp. 311–342.Google Scholar
Larson, A. O. & Fisher, C. K. (1938). The Bean Weevil and the Southern Cowpea Weevil in California.—Tech. Bull. U.S. Dep. Agric., no. 593, 70 pp.Google Scholar
Lepesme, P. (1945). Les Coléoptères des denrées alimentaires et des produits industriels entreposés.—Encycl. Ent., (A) 22, 335 pp. Paris, Lechevalier.Google Scholar
Linnaeus, C. (1758). Systema naturae, ed 10, 1, p. 386.Google Scholar
Mukerji, S. & Chatterjee, S. N. (1951). Morphology of the genital structures of some of the Bruchidae (Lariidae) of India and Ceylon and their taxonomic importance.—Indian J. Ent., 13, pp. 1–28.Google Scholar
Pic, M. (1902). Coléoptères présumés nouveaux de la Rhodésia.—Rev. Ent. Caen, 21, pp. 4–7.Google Scholar
Pic, M. (1913). Bruchidae.—Coleopt. Cat., pars 55, 74 pp.Google Scholar
Schönherr, C. J. (1833). Genera et species Curculionidum, 1, pp. 31–113.Google Scholar
Schönherr, C. J. (1839). Genera et species Curculionidum, 5, pt. 1, pp. 1–141.Google Scholar
Thunberg, C. P. (1816). Fyra nya arter af Bruchus-slagtet.—K. VetenskAkad. Handl., 37, pp. 46–47.Google Scholar
Utida, S. (1954). “ Phase ” dimorphism observed in the laboratory population of the Cowpea Weevil, Callosobruchus quadrimaculatus. [In Japanese with English summary.]—Oyo-Dobuts. Zasshi, 18, pp. 161–168.Google Scholar
Zacher, F. (1952). Die Nährpflanzen der Samenkäfer.—Z. angew. Ent., 33, pp. 460–480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zacher, F. (1954). Bruchidae (Lariidae, Mylabridae), Samenkäfer, Muffelkäfer, Pulsebeetles, Bean and Pea Weevils. [In] Sorauer, P. Handb. Pflanzenkr., 5. Aufl., 5, II. Teil, 2. Lief., pp. 380–397. Berlin, Parey.Google Scholar