Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T07:20:15.905Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The specific Biological Characteristics of Anopheles (Myzomyia) sergentii (Theo.) and their Correlation with Malaria Control in Israel

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

Z. Saliternik
Affiliation:
Director, Anti-Malaria Department, Ministry of Health, Jerusalem, Israel.

Extract

Anopheles (Myzomyia) sergentii (Theo.) has been shown to be the most important vector of malaria, especially of Plasmodium falciparum, in Israel at the present time.

The morphology of the adults, larvae and eggs is discussed, details being given of variations in the pigmentation of the fronto-clypeus in the larvae, a factor the possible genetical significance of which is felt to warrant further research.

Resistance of the aquatic stages to extreme variations in environmental conditions and their ability to survive and even metamorphose in minimal amounts of water have been observed. Breeding in nature has been found between 12°C. and 36°C. At 30°C. the time elapsing from egg-laying to hatching is one and a half days. Pupal development takes a further one and a half days and the total time from oviposition to the emergence of the adult is nine days, whereas in winter it may be as much as three months.

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1955

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bodenheimer, F. S. (1926). Über die Voraussage der Generationszahl von Insekten. III.—Z. angew. Ent., 12, pp. 91122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buxton, P. A. (1924). Applied entomology of Palestine, being a report to the Palestine government.—Bull. ent. Res., 14, pp. 289340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Callot, J. & Ristorcelli, A. (1938). Localité nouvel pour Anopheles (Myzotnyia) sergenti Theobald, 1907.—Arch. Inst. Pasteur Tunis, 27, pp. 105107.Google Scholar
Kligler, I. J. (1930). The epidemiology and control of malaria in Palestine.—240 pp. Chicago, Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Leeson, H. S., Lumsden, W. H. R., Yofe, J. & Macan, T. T. (1950). Anopheles and malaria in the Near East.—Mem. Lond. Sch. Hyg. trop. Med., no. 7, 223 pp.Google Scholar
Mer, G. (1931). Notes on the bionomics of Anopheles elutus Edw. (Dipt., Culic.).—Bull. ent. Res., 22, pp. 137145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mohyddin, Farid (1940). Malaria infection in Anopheles sergenti in Egypt.—Riv. Malariol., 19, (1) pp. 159161.Google Scholar
Saliternik, Z. (1942). The macroscopic differentiation of Anopheline eggs according to their pattern on the surface of water.—Bull. ent. Res., 33, p. 221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saliternik, Z. (1945). The biology of the four most important Anopheles mosquitoes in Palestine and the adaptation of the antimalaria activities to their specific characteristics.—(Hebrew University doctoral dissertation).Google Scholar
Saliternik, Z. (1950). Annual report of the Antimalaria Department, 1949.[In Hebrew.]—Jerusalem, Minist. Hlth.Google Scholar
Saliternik, Z. (1953). Report of the Antimalaria Department for 1950–1952.[In Hebrew with English summary.]—68 pp. multigraph. Jerusalem, Minist. Hlth.Google Scholar
Shapiro, I. I. & Saliternik, Z. (1930). Malaria in Palestine. [In Hebrew.]144 pp. Jerusalem, Safer Press.Google Scholar
Shapiro, J. M., Saliternik, Z. & Belferman, S. (1944). Malaria survey of the Dead Sea area during 1942, including the description of a mosquito flight test and its results.—Trans. R. Soc. trop. Med. Hyg., 38, pp. 95116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar