Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T09:20:19.536Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Spatial patterns of the parasitic mite Hemisarcoptes coccophagus (Astigmata: Hemisarcoptidae): host effect, density-dependence of aggregation, and implications for biological control

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

Sergey Izraylevich  and
Uri Gerson
Sergey Izraylevich*
Affiliation:
Department of Entomology, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Rehovot, Israel
Uri Gerson
Affiliation:
Department of Entomology, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Rehovot, Israel
*
Dr U. Gerson, Department of Entomology, Faculty of Agriculture, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, POB 12, Rehovot 76100, Israel.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The spatial distribution of the parasitic mite Hemisarcoptes coccophagus Meyer on two armoured scale insects (Homoptera: Diaspididae) was highly aggregated in the field. Mites were more aggregated on young than on ovipositing host scale females. No differences in the mite's distribution pattern were found between latania scale (Hemiberlesia lataniae (Signoret)) and oleander scale (Aspidiotus nerii (Bouché)). Mite aggregation was density-dependent on ovipositing host females (the degree of overdispersion decreased as mite abundance increased), but density-independent on young females. The effect of density-dependent and independent mite aggregation on the proportion of hosts escaping attack at different parasite abundances was simulated, and its relevance to biological control of Diaspididae is discussed.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Bulletin of Entomological Research , Volume 85 , Issue 2 , June 1995 , pp. 235 - 240
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderson, R.M. & Gordon, D.M. (1982) Processes influencing the distribution of parasite numbers within host populations with special emphasis on parasite-induced host mortalities. Parasitology 85, 373–398.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Anderson, R.M. & May, R.M. (1978) Regulation and stability of host-parasite population interactions. Journal of Animal Ecology 47, 219–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bliss, C.I. & Fisher, R.A. (1953) Fitting the negative binomial distribution to biological data. Biometrics 9, 176–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crofton, H.D. (1971a) A quantative approach to parasitism. Parasitology 62, 179–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crofton, H. D. (1971b) A model of host-parasite relationships. Parasitology 63, 343–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerson, U. (in press) First record of the genus Hemisarcoptes Lignières (Acari: Astigmata: Hemisarcoptidae) in Australia. Australian Entomologist.Google Scholar
Gerson, U. & Schneider, R. (1981) Laboratory and field studies on the mite Hemisarcoptes coccophagus Meyer (Astigmata: Hemisarcoptidae), a natural enemy of armored scale insects. Acarologia 22, 199–208.Google Scholar
Gerson, U., O'Connor, B.A. & Houck, M.A. (1990) Acari. pp. 77–99in Rosen, D. (Ed.) Armored scale insects: their biology, natural enemies and control. Amsterdam, Elsevier.Google Scholar
Hill, M.G., Allan, D.J., Henderson, R.C. & Charles, J.C. (1993) Introduction of armored scale predators and establishment of the predatory mite Hemisarcoptes coccophagus (Acari: Hemisarcoptidae) on latania scale, Hemiberlesia lataniae (Homoptera: Diaspididae) in kiwifruit shelter trees in New Zealand. Bulletin of Entomological Research 83, 369–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horn, D.J. (1988) Ecological approach to pest management. London, Elsevier.Google Scholar
Izraylevich, S. & Gerson, U. (1993) Mite parasitization on armored scale insects: host suitability. Experimental and Applied Acarology 17, 861–875.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ji, L.-Z., Gerson, U. & Izraylevich, S. (in press) The mite Hemisarcoptes sp. (Astigmata: Hemisarcoptidae), parasitizing willow oyster scale (Homoptera: Diaspididae) on poplars in northern China. Experimental and Applied Acarology.Google Scholar
Kaufmann, T. (1977) Hemisarcoptes sp. and biological control of the date palm scale, Parlatoria blanchardi Targioni, in the Sahel region of Niger. Environmental Entomology 6, 882–884.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuno, E. (1991) Sampling and analysis of insect populations. Annual Review of Entomology 36, 285–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lanciani, C.A. & Boyett, J.M. (1980) Demonstrating parasitic water mite-induced mortality in natural host populations. Parasitology 81, 465–475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Margolis, L., Esch, G.W., Holmes, J.C., Kurls, A.M. & Schad, G.A. (1982) The use of ecological terms in parasitology (report of an ad hoc committee of the American Society of Parasitologists). Journal of Parasitology 68, 131–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perry, J.N. & Taylor, L.R. (1988) Families of distribution for repeated samples of animal counts. Biometrics 44, 881–890.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruesink, W.G. (1980) Introduction to sampling theory. pp. 61–78in Kogan, M. & Herzog, D.C. (Eds) Sampling methods in soybean entomology. New York, Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SAS (1988) SAS/STAT user's guide. Release 6.03 edition. Cary, North Carolina, SAS Institute.Google Scholar
Southwood, T.R.E. (1978) Ecological methods with particular reference to the study of insect populations. 2nd edn.524 pp. London, Chapman & Hall.Google Scholar
Taylor, L.R. (1961) Aggregation, variance and the mean. Nature, London 189, 732–735.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, L.R. (1984) Assessing and interpreting the spatial distributions of insect populations. Annual Review of Entomology 29, 321–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, L.R., Woiwod, I.P. & Perry, J.N. (1978) The density dependence of spatial behavior and the rarity of randomness. Journal of Animal Ecology 47, 383–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, L.R., Woiwod, I.P. & Perry, J.N. (1979) The negative binomial as an ecological model and the density-dependence of K. Journal of Animal Ecology 48, 289–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, L.T. (1985) Estimating the abundance and impact of arthropod natural enemies in IPM systems. pp. 303–322in Hoy, M.A. & Herzog, D.C. (Eds) Biological control in agricultural IPM systems. Orlando Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, Z.-Q., Chen, P.-R., Wang, K. & Wang, X.-Y. (1993) Overdispersion of Allothrombium pulvinum larvae (Acari: Trombidiidae) parasitic on Aphis gossypii (Homoptera: Aphididae) in cotton fields. Ecological Entomology 18, 379–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar