Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-04T09:21:08.561Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Some factors affecting the efficiency of sticky board traps for capturing the carrot fly, Psila rosae (Diptera: Psilidae)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

Rosemary H. Collier  and
S. Finch
Rosemary H. Collier
Affiliation:
AFRC Institute of Horticultural Research, Wellesbourne, Warwick, UK
S. Finch
Affiliation:
AFRC Institute of Horticultural Research, Wellesbourne, Warwick, UK
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The relative attractiveness of coloured sticky board traps to the carrot fly (Psila rosae (Fabricius)) is described by a model in which fly catch is related positively to the amount of light reflected from the trap in the green-yellow (550–570 nm) band of the spectrum and negatively to the amount reflected in the violet-green (390–550 nm) band. The model allows the performance of new coloured traps to be predicted solely from spectral reflectivity measurements. Similar numbers of carrot flies were caught/unit area on traps varying in size from 150 cm2 to 4800 cm2. Most flies were caught on traps resting on the ground. The number of flies caught was reduced by 0.84% for each cm the trap was raised above 10 cm from the ground. One-sided sticky traps angled at 45° to the vertical doubled the numbers of carrot flies caught/unit trapping area and reduced by 90% the numbers of non-target species caught.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Bulletin of Entomological Research , Volume 80 , Issue 2 , June 1990 , pp. 153 - 158
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bohlen, E. (1967) Untersuchungen zum Verhalten der Möhrenfliege, Psila rosae Fab. (Dipt. Psilidae) im Eiablage-funktionskreis. Zeitschrift für Angewandte Entomologie 59, 325–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brunel, E. & Langouet, L. (1970) Influence de caractéristiques optiques du milieu sur les adultes de Psila rosae Fab. (Diptères: Psilides): attractivité du surfaces colorées, rythme journalier d'activité. Comptes Rendus des Séances de la Société de Biologie 164, 1638–1644.Google Scholar
Brunel, E. & Rabasse, J.M. (1975) Influence de la forme et de la dimension de pièges à eau colorés en jaune sur les captures d'insectes dans une culture de carotte. Cas particulier des Diptères. Annales de Zoologie – Ecologie Animale 7, 345–364.Google Scholar
Collier, R.H., Finch, S., Emmett, B.J. & Blood-Smyth, J. (in press) Monitoring populations of the carrot fly, Psila rosae, with sticky and water traps. Annals of Applied Biology (Accepted August 1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coppock, L.J. (1974) Notes on the biology of carrot fly in eastern England. Plant Pathology 23, 93–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finch, S. & Collier, R.H. (1988) Development of traps for monitoring populations of the carrot fly. Integrated Control in Field Vegetable Crops. IOBC/WPRS Bulletin XI/1, 1–7.Google Scholar
Finch, S. & Collier, R.H. (1989) Effects of the angle of inclination of traps on the numbers of large Diptera caught on sticky boards in certain vegetable crops. Entomologia experimentalis et applicata 52, 23–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freuler, J., Fischer, S. & Bertuchoz, P. (1982) La mouche de la carotte, Psila rosae Fab. (Diptera: Psilidae). II Mise au point d'un piège. Station Fédérale de Recherches Agronomiques de Changins, No. 1319, pp. 10–15Revue Suisse de Viticulture Arboriculture Horticulture 14, 137–142.Google Scholar
Getzin, L.W. & Archer, T.E. (1983) Carrot rust fly (Diptera: Psilidae) control: monitoring adults to schedule post-plant-emergence, soil-applied larvicides. Journal of Economic Entomology 73, 558–562.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, C.H. & Flint, S. (1986) An analysis of colour effects in the performance of the F2 trap against Glossina pallidipes Austen and G. morsitans morsitans Westwood (Diptera: Glossinidae). Bulletin of Entomological Research 76, 409–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Judd, G.J.R., Vernon, R.S. & Borden, J.H. (1985) Monitoring program for Psila rosae (F.) (Diptera: Psilidae) in southwestern British Columbia. Journal of Economic Entomology 78, 471–476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oakley, J.N. (1979) Carrot pest monitoring in S W Lancashire. Report to Umbelliferous Pests Working Party. MAFF/ADAS. 3 pp.Google Scholar
Ouden, H. Den & Theunissen, J. (1988) Monitoring populations of the carrot rust fly, Psila rosae, for supervised control. Integrated Control in Field Vegetable Crops. IOBC/WPRS Bull. XI/1. pp. 26–32.Google Scholar
Philipsen, H. (1983) Brug af gule limplader til vurdering af risiko for angreb af gulerodsfluen (Psila rosae F.). Tidsskrift for Planteavl 87, 389–397.Google Scholar
Philipsen, H. (1988a) Monitoring techniques for the carrot fly (Psila rosae F.). Integrated Control in Field Vegetable Crops. IOBC/WPRS Bulletin XI/1, 8–13.Google Scholar
Philipsen, H. (1988b) Integrated pest management in Danish carrot fields: monitoring carrot fly (Psila rosae F.) by means of yellow sticky traps. pp. 169–175in Caralloro, R. & Pelerents, C. (Eds) Progress on pest management in field vegetables. Rotterdam, Balkema.Google Scholar
Skinner, G. & Finch, S. (1983) Carrot fly – trap development. 33rd Annual Report of the National Vegetable Research Station for 1982, p. 37.Google Scholar
Stadler, E. (1972) Über die Orientierung und das Wirtswahlverhalten der Möhrenfliege, Psila rosae F. (Diptera: Psilidae) II. Imagines. Zeitschrift für angewandte Entonmologie 70, 29–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stevenson, A.B. (1977) A disposable adhesive trap for monitoring the carrot rust fly. Proceedings of the Entomological Society of Ontario for 1976 107, 65–69.Google Scholar
Uvah, I.I.I. & Coaker, T.H. (1984) Effect of mixed cropping on some insect pests of carrots and onions. Entomologia experimentalis et applicata 36, 159–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar