Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T09:59:55.307Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Soil Population Studies. I.—The Effects of Cultivation and Treatment with Insecticides

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

J. G. Sheals
Affiliation:
National Agricultural Advisory Service, Wolverhampton.*

Extract

The effects of cultivation and treatments with DDT and BHC on soil Collembola and Acarina were, investigated. Cultivation resulted initially in a drastic reduction of the micro-arthropod population and in the fallow plots this reduction persisted. Re-seeding resulted in rapid recolonisation by Collembola, but the populations of Oribatei and Mesostigmata remained at a low level over a period of 17 months after sowing. Treatment with BHC caused a heavy reduction of most micro-arthropoda. DDT caused reductions of mites, particularly Mesostigmata, but there was a marked increase of Collembola in the plots so treated. Significant increases of Collembola and significant reductions of predacious Mesostigmata were also noted in the comparison of plots treated with a DDT plus BHC mixture with those receiving BHC alone. The increase of Collembola was thus associated with a reduction of predatory pressure. In most cases, the effects of the treatments that included BHC were apparent 17 months later, but a temporary recovery of near-surface dwelling Collembola occurred in the BHC-treated plots in February 1952. Of the groups and species significantly affected by insecticide treatments in October 1951, only in one case did the data of October 1952 produce significant evidence of recolonisation. This recovery was noted in the DDT-treated population of Punctoribates punctum (Koch).

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1956

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Von Baudissin, F. Graf. (1952). Die Wirkung von Pflanzenschutzmitteln auf Collembolen und Milben in verschiedenen Böden.—Zool. Jb., (Abt. Syst.), 81, pp. 4790.Google Scholar
Cleat, N. D. (1952). Growth in the laboratory of economically important Oribatid mites.—Nature, Lond., 169, pp. 280281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, D. W. (1953). Some effects of DDT on spider mites.—J. econ. Ent., 45, pp. 10111019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeBach, P. & Bartlett, B. (1951). Effects of insecticides on biological control of insect pests of citrus.—J. econ. Ent., 44, pp. 372383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Der Drift, J. (1951). Analysis of the animal community in a beech forest floor.—Tijdschr. Ent., 94, pp. 1168.Google Scholar
Frenzel, G. (1936). Untersuchungen über die Tierwelt des Wiesenbodens.—130 pp. Jena, Fischer.Google Scholar
Gisin, H. (1943). Ökologie und Lebensgemeinschaften der Collembolen im Schweizerischen Exkursionsgebiet Basels.—Rev. suisse Zool., 50, pp. 131224.Google Scholar
Grigor'eva, T. G. (1952). The action of hexachlorane introduced into the soil on the soil fauna. [In Russian.]Dokl. vsesoyuz. Akad. sel.-khoz. Nauk Lenina, 17, pp. 1620. (Rev. appl. Ent., (A) 41, p. 336.)Google Scholar
Hueck, H. J., Kuenen, D. J., Boer, Den P. J. & Jaeger-Draafsel, E. (1952). The increase of egg production of the Fruit Tree Red Spider Mite (Metatetranychus ulmi Koch) under influence of DDT.—Physiol. comp., 2, pp. 371377.Google Scholar
Keller, H. (1951). Über die Wirkung einer Bodenbegiftung mittels DDT- und Hexa-Mitteln auf die Kleinarthropoden, insbesondere Collembolen.—Naturwissenschaften, 38, pp. 480481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lord, F. T. (1949). The influence of spray programs on the fauna of apple orchards in Nova Scotia: II. Oystershell Scale, Lepidosaphes ulmi (L.).—Canad. Ent., 79, pp. 196209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lord, F. T. (1949–50). The influence of spray programs on the fauna of apple orchards in Nova Scotia: III. Mites and their predators.—Canad. Ent., 81, pp. 202214, 217230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lotka, A. J. (1925). Elements of physical biology.—460 pp. Baltimore, Williams & Wilkins.Google Scholar
MacLagan, D. S. (1932). An ecological study of the ‘ Lucerne Flea ’ (Smynthurus viridis, Linn). IBull. ent. Res., 23, pp. 101145, 151190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, H. & Wain, R. L. [1945]. The qualitative examination of insecticidal properties. Progress report, 1944.—Rep. agric. hort. Res. Sta. Bristol, 1944, pp. 121140.Google Scholar
Michael, A. D. (1884–88). British Oribatidae.—2 vols. London, Ray Soc.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richter, G. (1953). Die Auswirkung von Insektiziden auf die terricole Makrofauna. (Quantitative Untersuehungen begifteter und unbegifteter Waldböden.)—NachrBl. dtsch. PflSchdienst, Berlin, N.F. 7, pp. 6172.Google Scholar
Salt, G. & Hollick, F. S. J. (1944). Studies of wireworm populations. I. A census of wireworms in pasture.—Ann. appl. Biol., 31, pp. 5264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sheals, J. G. (1956). Notes on a collection of soil Acari.—Ent. mon. Mag., 92, pp. 99103.Google Scholar
Strenzke, K. (1952). Untersuchungen über die Tiergemeinschaften des Bodens: Die Oribatiden und ihre Synusien in den Böden Norddeutschlands. Lief. 1–2.—Zoologica, Stuttgart, 37, pp. 1173.Google Scholar
Volterra, V. (1928). Variations and fluctuations of the number of individuals in animal species living together.—J. Cons. int. Explor. Mer, 3, pp. 351. (Translation by Wells, M. E.in Chapman, R. N. (1931). Animal ecology, pp. 409448. New York, McGraw Hill.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weis-Fogh, T. (1948). Ecological investigations on mites and Collemboles in the soil.—Nat. Jutlandica, 1, pp. 135270.Google Scholar
Willmann, C. (1935). Über eine eigenartige Milbenfauna im Küstengrund-wasser der Kieler Bucht.—Schr. naturw. Ver. Schl.-Holst., 20, pp. 422434.Google Scholar
Willmann, C. (1936). Neue Acari aus schlesischen Wiesenböden.—Zool. Anz., 113, pp. 273290.Google Scholar