Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T18:31:18.584Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A Revision of the Genus Leptoconops, Skuse

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

Henry F. Carter
Affiliation:
School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool

Extract

The genus Leptoconops was erected in 1890 by the Australian dipterist Skuse for a minute black Chironomid fly which he captured at Woronora, near Sydney, New South Wales. This genus he placed in the last of the three sections into which he divided the family Chironomidae, namely, the Ceratopogonina. The fly greatly resembled a small species of Simulium in general facies, and presented certain peculiar characters which rendered it strikingly distinct from other members of the section. Indeed, certain authors (Mik 1894, Johannsen 1905) have since drawn attention to the marked similarity in the wing venation of an American species (L. torrens, Twns.) and Corynoneura, a genus of the subfamily Chironominae. Later (1907) Noé suggested the formation of an additional subfamily—Leptoconopinae—for the Australian and allied species (at that time classified in three genera), and Malloch (1915), although acknowledging that the genus Tersesthes, Twns. (a synonym of Leptoconops), was unknown to him, associated it with the Chironominae rather than with the Ceratopogoninae. Apart from the wing venation, however, Leptoconops shows no affinities with Corynoneura, but rather agrees with the Ceratopogonine midges, particularly in regard to the structure of the thorax and mouth-parts. Several species of Leptoconops have now been described, but owing to differences in the interpretation of, or slight variations in, some of the generic characters given by Skuse, as well as to subsequent descriptive errors, they have, in greater part, been referred to the genera Tersesthes, Twns., and Mycterotypus, Noé. As was to be expected, however, the close agreement exhibited in the diagnoses of these genera and of Leptoconops has caused several authors to suggest their identity; but indefinite or partial conclusion* only were reached, since the genotype of Leptoconops (L. stygius, Sk.) was not re-examined.

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1921

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Castellani, A. & Chalmers, A. J. (1913). A Manual of Tropical Medicine. London, 2nd ed., p. 678.Google Scholar
Castellani, A. & CHALMERS, A. J. (1919). A Manual of Tropical Medicine. 3rd ed., p. 803.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chatton, E. & Blanc, G. (1917). Notes et réflexions sur les Toxoplasmes et la Toxoplasmose du Gondi (Toxoplasma gundii, Nicolle et Marceaux, 1909). —Arch. Inst. Past. Tunis, x., pp. 140.Google Scholar
Grassi, B. (1901). Die Malaria: Studien eines Zoologen. Jena, pp. 118122.Google Scholar
Johannsen, O. A. (1905). Aquatic Nematocerous Diptera, II. — N. Y. Sta. Mus. Bull. No. 86, pp. 9496.Google Scholar
Kieffer, J. J. (1906). Chironomidae. Genera Insectorum. Wytsman. 42efasc. Diptera, pp. 4448.Google Scholar
Kieffer, J. J. (1908). Description d’une espéce nouvelle de Chironomides d’Egypte. — Ann. Mus. Nat. Hung. vi.Google Scholar
Kieffer, J. J. (1917). Chironomidae d’ AustralieAnn. Mus. Nat. Hung. xv, pp. 189191.Google Scholar
Kieffer, J. J. (1918). Chironomides d’ Afrique et d’ Asie. — Ann. Mus. Nat. Hung. xvi, pp. 31136.Google Scholar
Langeron, M.. (1913). Mycterotypus laurae; description d’une variété nouvelle (M. laurae var. peneti). — Arch. Parasit. xvi, pp. 282304.Google Scholar
Lutz, A. (1912). Contribuicão para o estudo das Ceratopogoninas haematofagas do Brazil. — Mem. Inst. Osw. Cruz, iv, p. 24.Google Scholar
Lutz, A.. (1913). Do. — Mem. Inst. Osw. Cruz, v, pp. 4572.Google Scholar
Malloch, J. R. (1915). The Chironomidae, or Midges, of Illinois, with particular reference to the species occuring in the Illinois River. — Bull. Ill. Sta. Lab. Nat. Hist. x, Art. 6, p. 401.Google Scholar
Meijere, J. C. H. de (1915.) Diptera aus Nord-Neu Guinea. — Tijds. voor Ent. lviii, pp. 98101.Google Scholar
Mik, (1894). Wiener Ent. Zeit. xiii, p. 164.Google Scholar
Noé, G. (1905). Un nuovo genere appartenente alla famiglia Chironomidae. — Atti. della Reale Accad. dei Lincei, Ser. 5, Rendiconti, xiv, pp. 114120.Google Scholar
Noé, G. (1907). Due nuove specie di Ditteri appartenenti ad un genere nuovo. — Arch. Zool. Napoli, iii, pp. 101164.Google Scholar
Pratt, F. C. (1907). Notes on “Punkies”. — U.S. Dept. Agric. Bur. Ent. Bull. No. 64, part 3, pp. 2328.Google Scholar
Sambon, L. W. (1913). The Causation of Pellagra: a Contribution to the Discussion on Dr. Sandwith’s Paper. — Trans. Soc. Trop. Med. & Hyg. vi, pp. 231241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skuse, A. A. (1890). Diptera of Australia. Part VI. The Chironomidae. — Proc. Linn. Soc. N.S.W. (2nd Ser.), iv, p. 288.Google Scholar
Townsend, C. H. T. (1893). An interesting Blood-sucking Gnat of the family Chironomidae. — Psyche, vi, p. 369371.Google Scholar
Weiss, A. (1912). Mycterotypus laurae, n. sp., Chironomide nouveau du Sud Tunisien. — Arch. Inst. Past. Tunis, pp. 2532.Google Scholar
Willcocks, F. C. (1918). Notes on some Insects found in Egypt of Medical and Veterinary Interest. — Bull. Soc. Ent. d’ Egypte, 3rd fasc., July-Sept., p. 84.Google Scholar