Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T16:35:59.268Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Responses of Pests to Fumigation. IV.—The responses of Calandra spp. to Reduced Pressures*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

A. K. M. El Nahal
A. K. M. El Nahal
Affiliation:
Imperial College Field Station, Sunninghill, Berks.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The direct action of reduced pressures, in the absence of any fumigant, on C. oryzae and C. granaria have been investigated in glass chambers of about 1 litre capacity. C. oryzae is sufficiently sensitive to make the direct effect of reducing the pressure within the range 2 to 10 cm. mercury of some practical importance, but C. granaria is more resistant. Mortality of both species increases for exposure periods of up to 8 hr. and for increased temperatures from 20°C. to 28°C. A large part of the observed mortality must be associated with enhanced water-loss from the insects at reduced pressures, as little response occurs when the atmosphere is kept saturated with water-vapour.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Bulletin of Entomological Research , Volume 44 , Issue 4 , December 1953 , pp. 651 - 656
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1953

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bare, C. O. (1948). The effect of prolonged exposure to high vacuum on stored-tobacco insects.—J. econ. Ent., 41, pp. 109–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cole, F. J. (1906). The bionomics of grain weevils.—J. econ. Biol., 1, pp. 63–71.Google Scholar
Fisk, F. W. & Shepard, H. H. (1938). Laboratory studies of methyl bromide as an insect fumigant.—J. econ. Ent., 31, pp. 79–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Govaerts, J. & Leclercq, J. (1946). Water exchange between insects and air moisture.—Nature, Lond., 157, p. 483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lepigre, A. L. (1949). La désinsectisation par fumigation avec vide préalable.—Docum. phytosanit. Minist. Agric. Fr., Sér. ent. no. 9, 318 pp.Google Scholar
Livingstone, E. M. & Reed, W. B. (1940). Water vapour as a factor affecting the survival of Ephestia elutella and Lasioderma serricorne at reduced pressure.—Ann. ent. Soc. Amer., 33, pp. 583–587.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lubatti, O. F. & Harrison, A. (1944). Determination of Fumigants XVII. Comparison of the sorption of hydrogen cyanide, ethylene oxide, trichloracetonitrile, and methyl bromide by wheat.—J. Soc. chem. Ind., 63, pp. 353–359.Google Scholar
Moore, W. & Carpenter, E. L. (1938). The fumigation of insects with hydrocyanic acid: effect of different air pressures.—J. econ. Ent., 31, pp. 419–426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oxley, T. A. (1948). The scientific principles of grain storage. —Liverpool, North. Publ. Co.Google Scholar
Salmond, K. F. (1953). Responses of pests to fumigation. II. Toxicity of hydrogen cyanide to Calandra spp. under reduced pressure.—Bull. ent. Res., 44, pp. 225–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turtle, E. E. (1941). Studies in the retention of hydrogen cyanide by certain products on fumigation.—Ph.D. Thesis, University of London.Google Scholar