Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T21:19:47.110Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The relative attractiveness of cattle, sheep and goats to Glossina morsitans morsitans Westwood and G. pallidipes Austen (Diptera: Glossinidae) in the Zambesi Valley of Rhodesia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

R. D. Pilson ,
W. P. Boyt  and
P. K. I. MacKenzie
R. D. Pilson
Affiliation:
Tsetse and Trypanosomiasis Control Branch, Department of Veterinary Services, P.O. Box 8283, Causeway, Rhodesia
W. P. Boyt
Affiliation:
Tsetse and Trypanosomiasis Control Branch, Department of Veterinary Services, P.O. Box 8283, Causeway, Rhodesia
P. K. I. MacKenzie
Affiliation:
Tsetse and Trypanosomiasis Control Branch, Department of Veterinary Services, P.O. Box 8283, Causeway, Rhodesia
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A series of investigations was conducted to evaluate the comparative attractiveness of cattle, sheep and goats to Glossina morsitans morsitans Westw. and G. pallidipes Aust. in the Zambesi Valley, Rhodesia. It was shown that cattle are subjected to in excess of three times the challenge by male G. m. morsitans than either sheep or goats. Due to the repellent effect of man's presence on the attraction and feeding of female G. m. morsitansand both male and female G. pallidipes on the bait animals, no rational relationship could be postulated for them. Possible factors accounting for the difference of attractiveness between the three bait species are discussed.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Bulletin of Entomological Research , Volume 68 , Issue 3 , September 1978 , pp. 489 - 495
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1978

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Cockbill, G.F. (1968). Rep. Brch Tsetse Trypan. Control, Rhod. 1968.Google Scholar
Cockbill, G.F. (1970). Rep. Brch Tsetse Trypan. Control, Rhod. 1970.Google Scholar
Corson, J.F. (1932). The results of successive bites of an infected tsetse fly.—J. trop. Med. Hyg. 35, 136–137.Google Scholar
Harley, J.M.B., Cunningham, M.P. & Van Hoeve, K. (1966). The number of infective Trypanosome rhodesiense extruded by Glossina morsitans during feeding.—Ann. trop.Med. Parasit. 60, 455–460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, C.H.N. (1953). A mixed population of Glossina morsitans and G. swynnertoni.— J. Anim. Ecol. 22, 78–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leggate, B.M. & Pilson, R.D. (1961). The diurnal feeding activity of Glossina pallidipes Aust. in relation to trypanosome challenge.—Bull. ent. Res. 51, 697–704.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pilson, R.D. & Harley, J.M.B. (1959). The importance of cattle as a host of G. morsitans in Ankole.—Rep. E. AIr. Trypan. Res. Org. 1958, 45–47.Google Scholar
Stephen, L.E. (1970) Clinical manifestations of the trypanosomiases in livestock and other domestic animals, pp. 774–794 in Mulligan, H.W. (Ed.). The African trypanosomiases—950 pp. London, Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Vale, G. A. (1973). The responses of tsetse flies to their host animals—Ph.D. thesis, Univ. Lond.Google Scholar
Weitz, B. (1952). The antigenicity of sera of man and animals in relation to the preparation of specific precipitating antisera.—J. Hyg., Camb. 50, 275–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar