Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T11:05:03.777Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A quantitative comparison of frugivorous tephritids (Diptera: Tephritidae) in tropical forests and rural areas of the Democratic Republic of Congo

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 May 2011

M. Virgilio*
Affiliation:
Royal Museum for Central Africa, Leuvensesteenweg 13, B-3080 Tervuren, Belgium Royal Belgian Institute of Natural Sciences, Vautierstraat 29, B-1000 Brussels, Belgium
T. Backeljau
Affiliation:
Royal Belgian Institute of Natural Sciences, Vautierstraat 29, B-1000 Brussels, Belgium Department of Biology, University of Antwerp, Groenenborgerlaan 171, B-2020 Antwerp, Belgium
R. Emeleme
Affiliation:
Département de Ecologie et Gestion des Ressources Animales, Université de Kisangani, BP 2012 Kisangani, Democratic Republic of Congo
J.L. Juakali
Affiliation:
Département de Ecologie et Gestion des Ressources Animales, Université de Kisangani, BP 2012 Kisangani, Democratic Republic of Congo
M. De Meyer
Affiliation:
Royal Museum for Central Africa, Leuvensesteenweg 13, B-3080 Tervuren, Belgium
*
*Authors for correspondence Fax: +32 (0) 27695695 E-mail: [email protected]

Abstract

Most of the current knowledge about African tephritids originates from studies performed in agricultural areas, while information about their distribution in pristine or moderately disturbed environments is extremely scarce. This study aims at (i) describing levels of spatial variability of frugivorous tephritids in tropical forests and small rural villages of the Congo River basin and (ii) verifying if human-mediated activities, such as small-scale agriculture and trade, can affect their distribution patterns. Four locations were sampled along a 250 km stretch of the Congo River. At each location, pristine and disturbed habitats (i.e. tropical forests and small rural villages, respectively) were sampled, with three replicate sites in each combination of habitat and location. Sampling with modified McPhail traps baited with four different attractants yielded 819 tephritid specimens of 29 species from seven genera (Bactrocera, Carpophthoromyia, Ceratitis, Dacus, Celidodacus, Perilampsis, Trirhithrum). The three most abundant species sampled (Dacus bivittatus, D. punctatifrons, Bactrocera invadens) showed significant variations in abundance across locations and sites and accounted for 98.29% of the overall dissimilarity between habitats. Assemblages differed among locations and sites while they showed significant differences between pristine and disturbed habitats in two out of the four locations. This study shows that frugivorous tephritids in central Congo have remarkably patchy distributions with differences among locations and sites representing the main source of variability. Our data show that, in rural villages of central Democratic Republic of Congo, human activities, such as small-scale agriculture and local commerce, are not always sufficient to promote differences between the tephritid assemblages of villages and those of the surrounding tropical forests.

Type
Research Paper
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aluja, M. & Norrbom, A. (2000) Fruit Flies (Tephritidae) Phylogeny and Evolution of Behavior. Boca Raton, FL, USA, CRC Press.Google Scholar
Anderson, M. (2001a) A new method for non-parametric multivariate analysis of variance. Austral Ecology 26, 3246.Google Scholar
Anderson, M. (2001b) Permutation tests for univariate or multivariate analysis of variance and regression. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 58, 626639.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, M.J. (2003) PCO: a FORTRAN computer program for principal coordinate analysis. Department of Statistics, University of Auckland, New Zealand.Google Scholar
Anderson, M.J. (2004) CAP: a FORTRAN computer program for canonical analysis of principal coordinates. Department of Statistics, University of Auckland, New Zealand.Google Scholar
Anderson, M.J. & Willis, T.J. (2003) Canonical analysis of principal coordinates: a useful method of constrained ordination for ecology. Ecology 84, 511525.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balée, W. (1998) Historical ecology: premises and postulates. pp. 1329in Balée, W. (Ed.) Advances in Historical Ecology. New York, USA, Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Bruinsma, J. (2003) World Agriculture: Towards 2015/2030, an FAO Perspective. London, UK, Earthscan Publications.Google Scholar
Clarke, K.R. (1993) Non-parametric multivariate analyses of changes in community structure. Australian Journal of Ecology 18, 117143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Copeland, R.S., Okeka, W., Freidberg, A., Merz, B., White, I.M., De Meyer, M. & Luke, Q. (2005) Fruit flies (Diptera, Tephritidae) of Kakamega forest, Kenya. Journal of East African Natural History 94, 247278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Meyer, M., Robertson, M.P., Peterson, A.T. & Mansell, M.W. (2008) Ecological niches and potential geographical distributions of Mediterranean fruit fly (Ceratitis capitata) and Natal fruit fly (Ceratitis rosa). Journal of Biogeography 35, 270281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Meyer, M., Robertson, M.P., Mansell, M.W., Ekesi, S., Tsuruta, K., Mwaiko, W., Vayssières, J.F. & Peterson, A.T. (2010) Ecological niche and potential geographic distribution of the invasive fruit fly Bactrocera invadens (Diptera, Tephritidae). Bulletin of Entomological Research 100, 3548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Wasseige, C., Devers, D., de Marcken, P., Eba'a Atyi, R., Nasi, R. & Mayaux, P. (Eds) (2009) Les Forêts du Bassin du Congo–Etat des Forêts 2008. Luxembourg, Office des publications de l'Union européenne.Google Scholar
Drew, R.A.I., Tsuruta, K. & White, I.M. (2005) A new species of pest fruit fly (Diptera: Tephritidae: Dacinae) from Sri Lanka and Africa. African Entomology 13, 149154.Google Scholar
Ekesi, S. & Billah, M.K. (2007) A Field Guide to the Management of Economically Important Tephritid Fruit Flies in Africa. Nairobi, Kenya, ICIPE Science Press.Google Scholar
Lux, S.A., Copeland, R.S., White, I.M., Manrakhan, A. & Billah, M.K. (2003) A new invasive fruit fly species from the Bactrocera dorsalis (Hendel) group detected in East Africa. Insect Science and its Applications 23, 355360.Google Scholar
Malacrida, A., Gomulski, L., Bonizzoni, M., Bertin, S., Gasperi, G. & Guglielmino, C. (2007) Globalization and fruitfly invasion and expansion: the medfly paradigm. Genetica 131, 19.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mwatawala, M.W., De Meyer, M., Makundi, R.H. & Maerere, A.P. (2006) Seasonality and host utilization of the invasive fruit fly, Bactrocera invadens (Dipt., Tephritidae) in central Tanzania. Journal of Applied Entomology 130, 530537.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mwatawala, M., De Meyer, M., White, I.M., Maerere, A. & Makundi, R.H. (2007) Detection of the solanum fruit fly, Bactrocera latifrons (Hendel) in Tanzania (Dipt., Tephritidae). Journal of Applied Entomology 131, 501503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mwatawala, M.W., De Meyer, M., Makundi, R.H. & Maerere, A.P. (2009a) Host range and distribution of fruit-infesting pestiferous fruit flies (Diptera, Tephritidae) in selected areas of central Tanzania. Bulletin of Entomological Research 99, 629641.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mwatawala, M., De Meyer, M., Makundi, R. & Maerere, A.P. (2009b) An overview of Bactrocera (Diptera: Tephritidae) invasions and their speculated dominancy over native fruit fly species in Tanzania. Journal of Entomology 6, 1827.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mwatawala, M., Maerere, A.P., Makundi, R. & De Meyer, M. (2010) Incidence and host range of the melon fruit fly Bactrocera cucurbitae (Coquillett) (Diptera: Tephritidae) in central Tanzania. International Journal of Pest Management 56, 265273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parmesan, C. & Yohe, G. (2003) A globally coherent fingerprint of climate change impacts across natural systems. Nature 421, 3742.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Root, T.L., Price, J.T., Hall, K.R., Schneider, S.H., Rosenzweig, C. & Pounds, J.A. (2003) Fingerprints of global warming on wild animals and plants. Nature 421, 5770.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shelly, T., Nishimoto, J., Diaz, A., Leathers, J., War, M., Shoemaker, R., Al-Zubaidy, M. & Joseph, D. (2010) Capture probability of released males of two Bactrocera species (Diptera: Tephritidae) in detection traps in California. Journal of Economic Entomology 103, 20422051.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sokal, R.R. & Rohlf, F.J. (1995) Biometry: The Principles and Practice of Statistics in Biological Research. New York, USA, Freeman Press.Google Scholar
Underwood, A.J. (1997) Experiments in Eecology. Cambridge, UK, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Vayssières, J.F., Goergen, G., Lokossou, O., Dossa, P. & Akponon, C. (2005) A new Bactrocera species in Benin among mango fruit fly (Diptera: Tephritidae) species. Fruits 60, 371377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vayssières, J.F., Rey, J.Y. & Traoré, L. (2007) Distribution and host plants of Bactrocera cucurbitae in West and central Africa. Fruits 62, 391396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vayssières, J.F., Korie, S. & Ayegnon, D. (2009) Correlation of fruit fly (Diptera Tephritidae) infestation of major mango cultivars in Borgou (Benin) with abiotic and biotic factors and assessment of damage. Crop Protection 28, 477488.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Virgilio, M., Delatte, H., Backeljau, T. & De Meyer, M. (2010) Macrogeographic population structuring in the cosmopolitan agricultural pest Bactrocera cucurbitae (Diptera: Tephritidae). Molecular Ecology 19, 27132724.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, I.M. (2006) Taxonomy of the Dacina (Diptera:Tephritidae) of Africa and the Middle East. African Entomology Memoir 2, 1156.Google Scholar
White, I.M., De Meyer, M. & Stonehouse, J. (2000) A review of the native and introduced fruit flies (Diptera, Tephritidae) in the Indian Ocean Islands of Mauritius, Réunion, Rodrigues and Seychelles. pp. 1521in Price, N.S. & Seewooruthun, I. (Eds). Proceedings of the Indian Ocean Commission, Regional Fruit Fly Symposium. Mauritius, Indian Ocean Commission.Google Scholar