Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T21:14:53.671Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Potential of Hymenopteran larval and egg parasitoids to control stored-product beetle and moth infestation in jute bags

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 May 2014

C. Adarkwah*
Affiliation:
Division Urban Plant Ecophysiology, Faculty of Life Sciences, Humboldt-University of Berlin, Lentzeallee 55/57, 14195 Berlin, Germany Department of Agronomy, Faculty of Agriculture, University for Development Studies, P.O. Box TL 1882, Tamale, Ghana
C. Ulrichs
Affiliation:
Division Urban Plant Ecophysiology, Faculty of Life Sciences, Humboldt-University of Berlin, Lentzeallee 55/57, 14195 Berlin, Germany
S. Schaarschmidt
Affiliation:
Division Urban Plant Ecophysiology, Faculty of Life Sciences, Humboldt-University of Berlin, Lentzeallee 55/57, 14195 Berlin, Germany
B.K. Badii
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy, Faculty of Agriculture, University for Development Studies, P.O. Box TL 1882, Tamale, Ghana
I.K. Addai
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy, Faculty of Agriculture, University for Development Studies, P.O. Box TL 1882, Tamale, Ghana
D. Obeng-Ofori
Affiliation:
Department of Crop Science, University of Ghana, School of Agriculture, College of Agriculture & Consumer Sciences, Legon, P.O. Box 68, Accra, Ghana
M. Schöller
Affiliation:
Division Urban Plant Ecophysiology, Faculty of Life Sciences, Humboldt-University of Berlin, Lentzeallee 55/57, 14195 Berlin, Germany Biologische Beratung Ltd, Storkower Strasse 55-55a, 10409 Berlin, Germany
*
*Author for correspondence Phone: +4930-2093-46436 Fax: +4930-2093-46440 E-mail: [email protected]/[email protected]

Abstract

The control of stored-product moths in bagged commodities is difficult because the developmental stages of the moths are protected by the bagging material from control measures such as the application of contact insecticides. Studies were carried out to assess the ability of Hymenopteran parasitoids to locate their hosts inside jute bags in the laboratory. The ability of different parasitoids to penetrate jute bags containing rice was investigated in a controlled climate chamber. Few Habrobracon hebetor (Say) (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) passed through the jute material while a high percentage of Lariophagus distinguendus (Förster), Anisopteromalus calandrae (Howard) (Hymenoptera: Pteromalidae), Theocolax elegans (Westwood) (Hymenoptera: Pteromalidae) and Trichogramma evanescens Westwood (Hymenoptera: Trichogrammatidae) were able to enter the Petri-dishes. Significantly more L. distinguendus and T. elegans entered compared to H. hebetor. There was significant difference in the mean percentage parasitoids invading depending on species. Head capsules and/or thorax widths were measured in order to determine whether the opening in the jute material would be large enough for entry of the parasitoids. These morphometric data differed depending on parasitoid species and sex. The parasitoid Venturia canescens (Gravenhorst) (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae) did not enter the bags, but located host larvae inside the jute bags and parasitized rice moths Corcyra cephalonica larvae by stinging through the jute material. Venturia canescens significantly reduced the number of C. cephalonica adults emerging from the bagged rice; therefore, it could be released in storage rooms containing bagged rice for biological control of C. cephalonica. The use of parasitoids to suppress stored-product insect pests in bagged commodities could become a valuable supplement to the use of synthetic pesticides.

Type
Research Paper
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abebe, F., Tefera, T., Mugo, S., Beyene, Y. & Vidal, S. (2009) Resistance of maize varieties to the maize weevil Sitophilus zeamais (Motsch.) (Coleoptera: Curculionidae). African Journal of Biotechnology 8, 59375943.Google Scholar
Adarkwah, C., Büttner, C., Reichmuth, Ch., Obeng-Ofori, D., Prozell, S. & Schöller, M. (2010) Ability of the larval ectoparasitoid Habrobracon hebetor (Say, 1836) (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) to locate the rice moth Corcyra cephalonica (Stainton, 1865) (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) in bagged and bulk stored rice. Journal of Plant Diseases and Protection 117, 6770.Google Scholar
Adarkwah, C., Obeng-Ofori, D., Büttner, C., Reichmuth, C. & Schöller, M. (2012) Potential of Lariophagus distinguendus (Förster) (Hymenoptera: Pteromalidae) to suppress the maize weevil Sitophilus zeamais Motschulsky (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) in bagged and bulk stored maize. Biological Control 60, 175181.Google Scholar
Ambrosius, F., Adler, C., Reichmuth, C. & Steidle, J.L.M. (2006) Invasion of Trichogramma evanescens into food packages and the risk of food contamination. pp. 109117 in Stengård Hansen, L., Enkegaard, A., Steenberg, T., Ravnskov, S. & Larsen, J. (Eds), Implementation of Biocontrol in Practice in Temperate Regions – Present and Near Future. DIAS report No. 119. Danish Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Tjele, Denmark. Google Scholar
Cline, L.D. & Highland, H.A. (1981) Minimum size holes allowing passage of adults of stored-product Coleoptera. Journal of the Georgia Entomological Society 16, 521524.Google Scholar
Cline, L.D., Press, J.W. & Flaherty, B.R. (1984) Preventing the spread of the almond moth (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) from infested food debris to adjacent uninfested packages, using the parasite Bracon hebetor (Hymenoptera: Braconidae). Journal of Economic Entomology 77, 331333.Google Scholar
Cline, L.D., Press, J.W. & Flaherty, B.R. (1985) Suppression of the Rice weevil, Sitophilus oryzae (Coleoptera, Curculionidae) inside and outside of burlap, woven polypropylene, and cotton bags by the parasitic wasp, Anisopteromalus calandrae (Hymenoptera: Pteromalidae). Journal of Economic Entomology 78, 835838.Google Scholar
Cohen, J.E., Jonsson, T., Müller, C.B., Godfray, H.C. & Savage, V.M. (2005) Body sizes of hosts and parasitoids in individual feeding relationships. Proceedings of the National Acadamy of Sciences USA 102(3):684689.Google Scholar
Corbet, S.A. & Rotheram, S. (1965) The life-history of the ichneumonid Nemeritis (Devorgilla) canescens (Gravenhorst) as a parasite of the Mediterranean flour moth, Ephestia (Anagasta) kuehniella Zeller, under laboratory conditions. Proceedings of the Royal Entomological Society London (A) 40, 6772.Google Scholar
Eliopoulos, P.A. & Stathas, G.J. (2008) Life tables of Habrabracon hebetor (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) parasitizing Anagasta kuehniella and Plodia interpunctella (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae): effect of host density. Journal of Economic Entomology 101, 982988.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Flinn, P.W. & Schöller, M. (2012) Biological control: insect pathogens, parasitoids, and predators. pp. 203212 in Hagstrum, D.W., Phillips, T.W. & Cuperus, G. (Eds) Stored Product Protection. Kansas State University, Manhattan, Kansas. ISBN 978-0-9855003-0-6.Google Scholar
Ghani, M.A. & Sweetman, M.L. (1955) Ecological studies on the granary weevil parasite, Aplastomorpha calandrae (Howard). Biologia 1, 115139.Google Scholar
Grieshop, M.J., Flinn, P.W. & Nechols, J.R. (2006) Biological control of Indian meal moth (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) on finished stored products using egg and larval parasitoids. Journal of Economic Entomology 99, 10801084.Google Scholar
Grieshop, M.J., Flinn, P.W., Nechols, J.R. & Schöller, M. (2007) Host-foraging success of three species of Trichogramma in simulated retail environments. Journal of Economic Entomology 100, 591598.Google Scholar
Heinz, K.M. (1991) Sex-specific reproductive consequences of body size in the solitary ectoparasitoid Diglyphus begini . Evolution 45, 15111515.Google Scholar
Hurlbutt, B.L. (1987) Sexual size dimorphism in parasitoid wasps. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 30, 6389.Google Scholar
Khan, M.A. (1983 a) Invasion von Vorratsschädlingen durch Verschlüsse. Anzeiger für Schädlingskunde, Pflanzenschutz und Umweltschutz 56, 9194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Khan, M.A. (1983 b) Untersuchungen über die Invasion von Eilarven von vorratsschädlichen Insekten durch verschieden große Poren des Verpackungsmaterials. Anzeiger für Schädlingskunde, Pflanzenschutz und Umweltschutz 56, 6567.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loosjes, F.E. (1957) Ervariingen met Chaetospila elegans (Westw.) (Hymenoptera: Pteromalidae), een parasiet van eniige soorten vooraadinsecten. Entomologische Berichte (Amsterdam) 17, 7477.Google Scholar
Markham, R.H., Bosque-Pérez, N., Borgemeister, C. & Meikle, W.G. (1994) Developing pest management strategies for the maize weevil, Sitophilus zeamais and the larger grain borer, Prostephanus truncatus, in the humid and sub-humid tropics. FAO Plant Protection Bulletin 42, 97116.Google Scholar
Mbata, G.N. (1985) Some physical and biological factors affecting oviposition by Plodia interpunctella (Hubner) (Lepidoptera: Phycitidae). Insect Science and Application 6, 597604.Google Scholar
Mbata, G.N. (1986) Combined effect of temperature and relative humidity on mating activities and commencement of oviposition in Plodia interpunctella (Hubner) (Lepidoptera: Phycitidae). Insect Science and Application 7, 623628.Google Scholar
Mbata, G.N. & Osuji, F.N.C. (1983) Some aspects of the biology of Plodia interpunctella (Hubner) Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) as a pest of stored groundnuts in Nigeria. Journal of Stored Products Research 19, 141151.Google Scholar
Morrill, A.W. (1942) Notes on the biology of Microbracon hebetor . Journal of Economic Entomology 35, 593594.Google Scholar
Mowery, S.V., Mullen, M.A., Campbell, J.F. & Broce, A.B. (2002). Mechanisms underlying sawtoothed grain beetle (Oryzaephilus surinamensis [L.]) (Coleoptera: Silvanidae) infestation of consumer food packaging materials. Journal of Economic Entomology 95(6), 13331336.Google Scholar
Obeng-Ofori, D. (2007) The use of botanicals by resource poor farmers in Africa and Asia for the protection of stored agricultural products. Stewart Postharvest Review 3, 18.Google Scholar
Press, J.W. & Mullen, M.A. (1992) Potential of the weevil parasitoid, Anisoptermalus calandrae (Howard) (Hymenoptera: Pteromalidae) for protecting commercially packaged wheat from infestation by rice weevils, Sitophilus oryzae (L) (Coleoptera: Curculionidae). Journal of the Kansas Entomology Society 65, 348351.Google Scholar
Prozell, S & Schöller, M 1998 Insect fauna of a bakery, processing organic grain and applying Trichogramma evanescens Westwood. In: Adler, C & Schöller, M (eds.) Integrated protection of stored products. IOBC wprs Bulletin 21, 3944.Google Scholar
Schmale, I., Wäckers, F.L., Cardona, C. & Dorn, S. (2006) Biological control of the bean weevil, Acanthoscelides obtectus (Say) (Col.: Bruchidae), by the native parasitoid Dinarmus basalis (Rondani) (Hym.: Pteromalidae) on small-scale farms in Colombia. Journal of Stored Products Research 42, 3141.Google Scholar
Schöller, M., Flinn, P.W., Grieshop, M.J. & Zdarkova, E. (2006) Biological control of stored product pests. pp. 6787 in Heaps, J.W. (Ed) Insect Management for Food Storage and Processing. American Association of Cereal Chemists International, St. Paul, Minnesota, USA.Google Scholar
Steidle, J.L.M. (1998) The biology of Lariophagus distinguendus: a natural enemy of stored product pests and potential candidate for biocontrol. IOBC Bulletin 21, 103109.Google Scholar
Thuy, P.T., Dien, L.D. & Van, N.G. (1994) Research on multiplication of Beauveria bassiana fungus and preliminary utilisation of Bb bioproduct for pest management in stored goods in Vietnam. pp. 11321133 in: Highley, E., Wright, E.J., Banks, H.J. & Champ, B.R. (Eds), Stored Product Protection, Proceedings of the 6th International Working Conference on Stored-Product Protection, 17–23 April 1994, Canberra, Australia. CAB International, Wallingford, UK.Google Scholar
Viljoen, J.H., Urban, A.J. & Schmidt, J. (1993) Pest control in bag-stored grain. pp. 1031 in Taylor, J.R.N., Randall, T.G. & Viljoen, J.H. (Eds) Selected Papers from ICC International Symposium 1993. CSIR, Pretoria, South Africa.Google Scholar