Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T07:15:57.239Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Pests of Economic Plants in Samoa and other Island Groups

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

G. H. E. Hopkins
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

During two years (1924 and 1925) spent in Samoa by Dr. P. A. Buxton and myself, while employed in research on filariasis for the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, we made notes of such agricultural pests as came our way, though (our main interests being medical) we were not able to investigate them at all thoroughly. For this reason the fact of an insect being recorded only on one occasion is no indication that it did not occur in other months, or even that it was uncommon, since we frequently did not continue to make notes of the occurrence of a species we had once recorded. Though our observations make no claim to completeness, they are perhaps worthy of publication in view of the scarcity of records from this group of islands. Our observations on medical and veterinary entomology have been published as a Memoir of the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine. In that Memoir we have published maps, and short accounts of the structure, flora and climate, of Samoa.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Bulletin of Entomological Research , Volume 18 , Issue 1 , September 1927 , pp. 23 - 32
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1927

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aulmann, G., 1914. Ein neuer Schädling an Kokospalmen auf Samoa.—Ent. Rundschau, xxxi, pp. 31, 32.Google Scholar
Buxton, P. A. & Hopkins, G. H. E., 1927. Researches in Polynesia and Melanesia : An Account of the Insects of Samoa, Tonga, the Ellice Group and the New Hebrides in 1924–25. Medical Entomology, pts. 1–4.—Memoirs of the London School of Hyg. & Trop. Med., no. 1, 260 pp., 12 pls., 43 figs.Google Scholar
Demandt, E., 1914. Samoanische Kakaokultur.—Beihefte zum Tropenpflanzer, xv, pp. 135–307.Google Scholar
Doane, R. W., 1913. The Rhinoceros Beetle (Oryctes rhinoceros L.) in Samoa.—J. Econ. Ent., vi, pp. 437–442.Google Scholar
Doane, R. W. & Ferris, G. F., 1916. Notes on Samoan Coccidae with Descriptions of three New Species.—Bull. Ent. Res., vi, pp. 399–402.Google Scholar
Edrozo, L.B., 1918. A Study of Tobacco Worms and Methods of Control.—Philippine Agriculturist & Forester, vi, pp. 195–209.Google Scholar
Friederichs, K., 1913 (1). Der Nashorn Kaefer und die Reinhaltung der Pflanzungen.—Samaonische Zeitung, 8–15 02 1913.Google Scholar
Friederichs, K., 1913 (2). Ueber den gegenwärtigen Stand der Bekämpfung des Nashornkäfers (Oryctes rhinoceros L.) in Samoa.—Der Tropenpflanzer, xvii, pp. 538–558, 603–619, 660–675.Google Scholar
Friederichs, K., 1914. Ueber Adoretus vestitus Boh. als Schädling in Samoa und seine früheren Stände.—Zs. wiss. Insectbiol., x, pp. 41–47.Google Scholar
Friederichs, K., 1918 (1). Bericht ueber den staatlichen Pflanzenschutzdienst in Deutsch-Samoa, 1912–1914.—Beiheft zum Tropenpflanzer, xviii, pp. 257–294.Google Scholar
Friederichs, K., 1918 (2). Können schädliche Insekten durch parasitische Pilze bekämpft werden ?—Mitt. Naturf. Ges. in Bern, 1918, pp. xv–xvi.Google Scholar
Friederichs, K., 1919. Studien über Nashornkäfer als Schädlinge der Kokospalme.—Monographien zur angew. Entomologie, no. 4 ; Supplement no. 1, Zs. angew. Ent., vi.Google Scholar
Friederichs, K., 1920. Ueber die Pleophagie des Insektenpilzen, Metarrhizium anisopliae (Metsch.).—Centralbl. Bakt. Parasit. Infektionskr., IIte. Abt., i, pp. 335–356.Google Scholar
Friederichs, K. & Demandt, E., 1922. Weiteres über den indischen Nashornkäfer (Oryctes rhinoceros L.).—Zs. angew. Ent., viii. pp. 285–324.Google Scholar
Gehrmann, K., 1913. Krankheiten und Schädlinge der Kulturpflanzen auf Samoa.—Arbeit, k. biol. Anst. Land-Forstwirtschaft, ix, pp. 1–120.Google Scholar
Jepson, F. P., 1912. The Rhinoceros Beetle (Oryctes rhinoceros) in Samoa.—Dept. of Agric., Fiji, Bull. no. 3.Google Scholar
(Legislation). Ordinance relating to the Coconut Beetle in Samoa. British Military Occupation of Samoa, Proclamation no. 6, 1914, and Proclamation no. 19, 1915, (Ordinance relating to the Destruction of the Coconut Beetle in Samoa).Google Scholar
Maskew, F., 1916. Quarantine Div. Report for Month of Dec. 1915.—Mthly. Bull. Cal. State Commiss. Hortic., v, pp. 74–76.Google Scholar
Maskew, F., 1920. Quarantine Div. Report for the Months of April and May, 1920.—Mthly. Bull. Cal. State Depart. Agric., ix, pp. 298–302.Google Scholar
(Report). The Coconut Beetle (O. nasicornis) in Samoa.–Report of the Commission of Enquiry concerning the Coconut Beetle in Samoa. Malua, Samoa, 1916, 60 pp.Google Scholar
Sasscer, E. R., 1915. Important Pests collected on imported Nursery Stock in 1914.—J. Econ. Ent., vii, pp. 268–270.Google Scholar
Simmonds, H. W., 1925. Pests and Diseases of the Coconut Palm in the Islands of the Southern Pacific.—Dept. of Agric., Fiji., Bull. no. 16.Google Scholar
Swezey, O. H., 1924. Notes on Insect Pests in Samoa.—Hawaiian Planters' Record, xxviii, pp. 214–219.Google Scholar