Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T06:03:00.049Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Penetration through the Egg-shell of Pieris brassicae (L.)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

J. W. L. Beament  and
R. Lal
J. W. L. Beament
Affiliation:
A.R.C. Unit of Insect Physiology, Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge.
R. Lal
Affiliation:
A.R.C. Unit of Insect Physiology, Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The structure of the shell of eggs of Pieris brassicae (L.), together with changes in it and associated membranes during embryonic development, have been investigated in relation to the penetration and toxicity of simple chemicals. The rigid outer shell consists of two proteinaceous layers, covered externally by a relatively hydrofuge cement, by which the egg is attached to the leaf surface. The egg has respiratory pores over its surface, and a single apical micropyle penetrating these layers. The inside of the rigid shell is lined with a layer of unsaturated oil—an unusual feature for an insect egg. When the egg is first laid, the vitelline membrane is directly applied to the inner surface of the solid shell over the region immediately around the micropyle, but within four hours this contact is broken, and the oil layer flows into this region also, and becomes complete. As development proceeds, the vitelline layer is replaced by membranes of embryonic origin, but before eclosion both these epembryonic layers, and also the oil, are resorbed.

The egg is remarkably resistant to water-soluble poisons which have no oil-solubility, except during the first four hours of development. This resistance is attributed almost entirely to the oil layer, and the early susceptibility to its absence over the micropylar region. These changes are not reflected in the effect of oil-soluble poisons or fumigants. The solid portions of the shell do not seem to be of great importance in restricting the entry of liquid poisons, even though the cement is comparatively hydrofuge; from experiments with wetting agents and with eggs immersed in poisons under vacuum, it does not appear that the respiratory air spaces in the shell are preferential channels of access; rather, the poisons penetrate through the solid portions of the shell. This penetration, even of oil-soluble materials, is slow, for they can be effectively washed out of the shell again, some considerable time after dipping. On the other hand, non-volatile oily materials can interfere with the respiration of the egg by blocking the air spaces in the shell.

The secretion of epembryonic layers does not appear to change the resistance of the egg to water-soluble materials; this is to be expected, for they do not contain lipoid. On the other hand they do add appreciably to the resistance to oil-soluble materials. There is no evidence that poisons are accumulated in these epembryonic membranes, and released during the pre-eclosion period. Experiments with covalent compounds, such as mercuric chloride, suggest that their oil-solubility accounts for their toxicity, whereas electrovalent compounds containing similar heavy metals are only effective while the direct micropylar path of entry is available to them.

Type
Research Paper
Information
Bulletin of Entomological Research , Volume 48 , Issue 1 , March 1957 , pp. 109 - 125
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1957

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Beament, J. W. L. (1946 a). The formation and structure of the chorion of the egg in an Hemipteran, Rhodnius prolixus.—Quart. J. micr. Sci., 87, pp. 393–439.Google Scholar
Beament, J. W. L. (1946 b). The waterproofing process in eggs of Rhodnius prolixus Stähl.—Proc. roy. Soc., (B) 133, pp. 407–418.Google Scholar
Beament, J. W. L. (1947). The formation and structure of the micropylar complex in the egg-shell of Rhodnius prolixus Stähl. (Heteroptera Reduviidae).—J. exp. Biol., 23, pp. 213–233.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Beament, J. W. L. (1948). The penetration of the insect egg-shells. I. Penetration of the chorion of Rhodnius prolixus, Stål.—Bull. ent. Res., 39, pp. 359–383.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Beament, J. W. L. (1949). The penetration of insect egg-shells. II. The properties and permeability of sub-chorial membranes during development of Rhodnius prolixus, Stål.—Bull. ent. Res., 39, pp. 467–488.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beament, J. W. L. (1951). The structure and formation of the egg of the fruit tree red spider mite, Metatetranychus ulmi Koch.—Ann. appl. Biol., 38, pp. 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
David, W. A. L. & Gardiner, B. O. C. (1952). Laboratory breeding of Pieris brassicae L. and Apanteles glomeratus L.—Proc. R. ent. Soc. Lond., (A) 27, pp. 54–56.Google Scholar
Judge, P. J. (1953). A new method for determining the transition temperature of insect cuticular waxes.—Nature, Lond., 172, pp. 405–406.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Salkeld, E. H. & Potter, C. (1953). The effect of the age and stage of development of insect eggs on their resistance to insecticides.—Bull. ent. Res., 44, pp. 527–580.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slifer, E. H. (1946). The effects of xylol and other solvents on diapause in the grasshopper egg….—J. exp. Zool., 102, pp. 333–356.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wigglesworth, V. B. (1950). A new method for injecting the tracheae and tracheoles of insects.—Quart. J. micr. Sci., 91, pp. 217–224.Google ScholarPubMed
Wigglesworth, V. B. & Beament, J. W. L. (1950). The respiratory mechanisms of some insect eggs.—Quart. J. micr. Sci., 91, pp. 429–452.Google ScholarPubMed