Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T05:06:32.713Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Partners in biological control of cocoa pests: Mutualism between Dolichoderus thoracicus (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) and Cataenococcus hispidus (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

C.T. Ho
Affiliation:
Golden Hope Plantations Berhad, Oil Palm Research Station, Banting, Malaysia
K.C. Khoo*
Affiliation:
Department of Plant Protection, Universiti Pertanian Malaysia, 43400 UPM, Serdang, Malaysia
*
* Author for correspondence.

Abstract

The observed mutualistic relationship between the black cocoa ant Dolichoderus thoracicus (Smith) and the mealybug Cataenococcus hispidus (Morrison) was examined. The importance of C. hispidus to D. thoracicus as a food source was investigated by giving D. thoracicus access to C. hispidus only, to C. hispidus and other food sources, and denying access to any obvious food sources. Dolichoderus thoracicus was seen to depend on C. hispidus alone as a source of food over an eight-week period of observation without showing ill effects. The role of D. thoracicus in spreading C. hispidus was studied in an experiment consisting of combinations of D. thoracicus and C. hispidus exclusion. It was shown that D. thoracicus was responsible for carrying C. hispidus across a ‘mealybug excluder’. Data on the frequency and duration of transport of C. hispidus by D. thoracicus were obtained by direct observation for a total of 90 h over 17 days. Both adults and nymphs of C. hispidus were carried by D. thoracicus with its mandibles in a brief and erratic manner, in the general direction of the trail. Such transportation is nevertheless considered to be important in view of the large number of individuals of D. thoracicus moving along a trail. The close mutualistic relationship between D. thoracicus and C. hispidus reiterates the necessity to manipulate both organisms for control of cocoa pests.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bakri, A.H., Asid, M. & Redshaw, M.J. (1986) Pemberantasan Helopeltis secara terpadu dengan penggunaan semut hitam dan bahan kimia pada tanaman coklat di Sumatera Utara. (Using black ants and chemicals in an integrated approach to control Helopeltis in cocoa in North Sumatra.) Temu Ilmiah Entomologi Perkebunan Indonesia, Medan, 1986, 11 pp.Google Scholar
Beattie, A.J. (1985) The evolutionary ecology of ant-plant mutualisms. 182 pp. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buckley, R.C. (1987) Interactions involving plants, Homoptera, and ants. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 18, 111135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collins, L. & Scott, J.K. (1982) Interaction of ants, predators and the scale insect, Pulvinariella mesembryanthemi, on Carpobrotus edulis, an exotic plant naturalised in Western Australia. Australian Entomological Magazine 8, 7378.Google Scholar
Cornwell, P.B. (1959) Movements of the vectors of virus disease of cacao in Ghana. 1. Canopy movement in and between trees. Bulletin of Entomological Research 49, 613630.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dumpert, K. (1981) The social biology of ants. 298 pp. Boston: Pitman Advanced Publishing Program.Google Scholar
Giesberger, G. (1983) Biological control of the Helopeltis pest of cocoa in Java. pp. 91180in Toxopeus, H. & Wessel, P.C. (Eds) Cocoa research in Indonesia 1900–1950, Volume Two. Wageningen, American Cocoa Research Institute and International Office of Cocoa and Chocolate.Google Scholar
Ho, C.T. (1991) The importance of mealybugs and colony compatibility in augmentation of Dolichoderus thoracicus (Smith) (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) populations in cocoa. 207 pp. Master of Agricultural Science Thesis, Universiti Pertanian Malaysia.Google Scholar
Ho, C.T. (1994) Relationship between the black cocoa ant Dolichoderus thoracicus (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) abundance and cocoa pod borer Conopomorpha cramerella (Lepidoptera: Gracilleridae) damage in a cocoa plantation pp. 214215in Rajan, A. & Ibrahim, Y.B. (Eds) Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Plant Protection in the Tropics. Malaysian Plant Protection Society, Kuala Lumpur. (Extended abstract).Google Scholar
Hölldobler, B. & Wilson, E.O. (1990) The ants. 732 pp. Berlin, Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
Khoo, K.C. & Chung, G.F. (1989) Use of the black cocoa ant to control mirid damage in cocoa. The Planter, Kuala Lumpur 65, 370383.Google Scholar
Khoo, K.C. & Ho, C.T. (1992) The influence of Dolichoderus thoracicus (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) on losses due to Helopeltis theivora (Heteroptera: Miridae), black pod disease, and mammalian pests in cocoa in Malaysia. Bulletin of Entomological Research 82, 485491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lema, K.M. & Herran, H.R. (1985) The influence of constant temperature on population growth rates of the cassava mealybug, Phenacoccus manihoti. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 38, 165169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maschwitz, U. & Hänel, H. (1985) The migrating herdsman Dolichoderus (Diabolus) cuspidatus: an ant with a novel mode of life. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 17, 171184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nielsen, M.G. & Josens, G. (1978) Production by ants and termites. pp. 4553in Brian, M.V. (Ed.) Production ecology of ants and termites. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Samways, M.J. (1983) Interrelationship between an entomogenous fungus and two ant-homopteran (Hymenoptera: Formicidae – Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae and Aphididae) mutualism on guava trees. Bulletin of Entomological Research 73, 321331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
See, Y.A. & Khoo, K.C. (1996) Influence of Dolichoderus thoracicus (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) on cocoa pod damage by Conopomorpha cramerella (Lepidoptera: Gracillariidae) in Malaysia. Bulletin of Entomological Research 86, 467474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stradling, D.J. (1978) Food and feeding habits of ants. pp. 81106in Brian, M.V. (Ed.) Production ecology of ants and termites. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Strickland, A.H. (1951) The entomology of swollen shoot of cacao. 1. The insect species involved, with notes on their biology. Bulletin of Entomological Research 41, 725748.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Way, M.J. (1954) Studies on the association of the ant Oecophylla longinoda (Latr.) (Formicidae) with the scale insect Saisettia zanzibarensis Williams (Coccidae). Bulletin of Entomological Research 45, 113134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Way, M.J. (1963) Mutualism between ants and honeydew-producing Homoptera. Annual Review of Entomology 8, 307344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Way, M.J. & Khoo, K.C. (1989) Relationships between Helopeltis theobromae damage and ants with special reference to Malaysian cocoa smallholdings. Journal of Plant Protection in the Tropics 6, 111.Google Scholar
Way, M.J. & Khoo, K.C. (1991) Colony dispersion and nesting habits of the ants, Dolichoderus thoracicus and Oecophylla smaragdina (Hymenoptera: Formicidae), in relation to their success as biological control agents on cocoa. Bulletin of Entomological Research 81, 341350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Way, M.J. & Khoo, K.C. (1992) Role of ants in pest management. Annual Review of Entomology 37, 479503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar