Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T11:19:05.655Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Oviposition of diamondback moth in the presence and absence of a novel host plant

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 June 2010

K. Henniges-Janssen ,
G. Schöfl ,
A. Reineke ,
D.G. Heckel  and
A.T. Groot
K. Henniges-Janssen*
Affiliation:
Max Planck Institute for Chemical Ecology, Department of Entomology, Hans-Knöll-Str. 8, 07745Jena, Germany
G. Schöfl
Affiliation:
Max Planck Institute for Chemical Ecology, Department of Entomology, Hans-Knöll-Str. 8, 07745Jena, Germany
A. Reineke
Affiliation:
Geisenheim Research Center, Department of Phytomedicine, Geisenheim, Germany
D.G. Heckel
Affiliation:
Max Planck Institute for Chemical Ecology, Department of Entomology, Hans-Knöll-Str. 8, 07745Jena, Germany
A.T. Groot
Affiliation:
Max Planck Institute for Chemical Ecology, Department of Entomology, Hans-Knöll-Str. 8, 07745Jena, Germany
*
*Author for correspondence Fax: +49 (0)3641-571502 E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The diamondback moth (DBM, Plutella xylostella L. (Lepidoptera: Plutellidae)) consumes a wide variety of brassicaceous host plants and is a common pest of crucifer crops worldwide. A highly unusual infestation of a sugar pea crop was recorded in Kenya in 1999, which persisted for two consecutive years. A strain (DBM-P) from this population was established in the laboratory and is the only one of several strains tested that can complete larval development on sugar peas. The oviposition acceptance and preference of the DBM-P strain was assessed in the presence of cabbage plants, sugar pea plants or both, in comparison to another strain (DBM-Cj) that was collected from cabbage and is unable to grow on pea plants. As expected, DBM-Cj females preferred to oviposit on cabbage plants. Surprisingly, DBM-P females also laid most eggs on cabbage and very few on peas. However, they laid significantly more eggs on the cabbage plant when pea plants were present. Our findings suggest that DBM-P manifested the initial stages of an evolutionary host range expansion, which is incomplete due to lack of oviposition fidelity on pea plants.

Keywords

Plutella xylostellaLepidopteraspecialistherbivorehost shifthost plant preferencecrucifer
Type
Research Paper
Information
Bulletin of Entomological Research , Volume 101 , Issue 1 , February 2011 , pp. 99 - 105
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agrawal, A.A. (2001) Phenotypic plasticity in the interactions and evolution of species. Science 294, 321–326.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Becerra, J.X. & Venable, D.L. (1999) Macroevolution of insect-plant associations: the relevance of host biogeography to host affiliation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 96, 12626–12631.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bernays, E.A. & Chapman, R.F. (1994) Host-Plant Selection of Phytophagous Insects. New York, Chapman and Hall.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowers, M.D., Stamp, N.E. & Collinge, S.K. (1992) Early stage of host range expansion by a specialist herbivore, Euphydryas phaeton (Nymphalidae). Ecology 73, 526–536.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bush, G.L. (1969) Sympatric host race formation and speciation in frugivorous flies of the genus Rhagoletis (Diptera, Tephritidae). Evolution 23, 237–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bush, G.L. (1994) Sympatric speciation in animals: new wine in old bottles. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 9, 285–288.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Corbet, S.A. (1985) Insect chemosensory responses: a chemical legacy hypothesis. Ecological Entomology 10, 143–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cunningham, J.P., Zalucki, M.P. & West, S.A. (1999) Learning in Helicoverpa armigera (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae): a new look at the behaviour and control of a polyphagous pest. Bulletin of Entomological Research 89, 201–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cunningham, J.P., West, S.A. & Zalucki, M.P. (2001) Host selection in phytophagous insects: a new explanation for learning in adults. OIKOS 95, 537–543.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ehrlich, P.R. & Raven, P.H. (1964) Butterflies and plants: a study in coevolution. Evolution 18, 586–608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feder, J.L., Opp, S.B., Wlazlo, B., Reynolds, K., Go, W. & Spisak, S. (1994) Host fidelity is an effective premating barrier between sympatric races of the apple maggot fly. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 91, 7990–7994.Google Scholar
Forbes, A.A., Fisher, J. & Feder, J.L (2005) Habitat avoidance: overlooking an important aspect of host-specific mating and sympatric speciation? Evolution 59, 1552–1559.Google ScholarPubMed
Forister, M.L. (2005) Independent inheritance of preference and performance in hybrids between host races of Mitoura butterflies. Evolution 59, 1149–1155.Google ScholarPubMed
Funk, D.J., Filchak, K.E. & Feder, J.F. (2002) Herbivorous insects: model systems for the comparative study of speciation ecology. Genetica 116, 251–267.Google Scholar
Gupta, P. & Thorsteinson, A. (1960a) Food plant relationships of the diamond-back moth (Plutella maculipennis (Curt.)) I. Gustation and olfaction in relation to botanical specificity of the larvae. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 3, 241–250.Google Scholar
Gupta, P. & Thorsteinson, A. (1960b) Food plant relationships of the diamond-back moth (Plutella maculipennis (Curt.)) II. Sensory regulation of oviposition of the adult female. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 3, 305–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hopkins, R.J., Van Dam, N.M. & Van Loon, J.J.A. (2009) Role of glucosinolates in insect-plant relationships and multitrophic interactions. Annual Review of Entomology 54, 57–83.Google Scholar
Janssen, K., Reineke, A., Scheirs, J.A. & Zebitz, C.P.W. & Heckel, D.G. (2008) A host shift of diamondback moth from crucifers to peas: Life history traits and genetic mechanisms. pp. 55–62 in The management of diamondback moth and other crucifer pests: Proceedings of the fifth international workshop. China Agricultural Science and Technology Press, 24–27 October 2006, Beijing.Google Scholar
Janz, N. & Nylin, S. (2008) The oscillation hypothesis of host-plant range and speciation. pp. 203–215 in Tilmon, K.J. (Ed.) Specialization, Speciation, and Radiation: The Evolutionary Biology of Herbivorous Insects. Berkeley and Los Angeles, CA, University of California Press.Google Scholar
Janz, N., Nyblom, K. & Nylin, S. (2001) Evolutionary dynamics of host plant specialization: a case study of the tribe Nymphalini. Evolution 55, 783–796.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Janz, N., Nylin, S. & Wahlberg, N. (2006) Diversity begets diversity: host expansions and the diversification of plant-feeding insects. BMC Evolutionary Biology 6, 4.Google Scholar
Jaenike, J. (1983) Induction of host preference in Drosophila melanogaster. Oecologia 58, 320–325.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Liu, S.-S. & Liu, T.-X. (2006) Preimaginal conditioning does not affect oviposition preference in the diamondback moth. Ecological Entomology 31, 307–315.Google Scholar
Liu, S.-S., Li, Y.-H., Liu, Y.-Q. & Zalucki, M.P. (2005). Experience-induced preference for oviposition repellents derived from a non-host plant by a specialist herbivore. Ecology Letters 8, 722–729.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Löhr, B. (2001) Diamondback moth on peas, really. Biocontrol News and Information 19, 38N–39N.Google Scholar
Löhr, B. & Gathu, R. (2002) Evidence of adaptation of diamondback moth, Plutella xylostella (L.), to pea, Pisum sativum L. Insect Science and its Application 22, 161–173.Google Scholar
Mercader, R.J. & Scriber, J.M. (2007) Diversification of host use in two polyphagous butterflies: differences in oviposition specificity or host rank hierarchy? Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 125, 89–101.Google Scholar
Murphy, S.M. & Feeny, P. (2006) Chemical facilitation of a naturally occurring host shift by Papilio machaon butterflies (Papilionidae). Ecological Monographs 76, 399–414.Google Scholar
Price, T.D., Qvarnström, A. & Irwin, D.E. (2003) The role of phenotypic plasticity in driving genetic evolution. Proceedings of the Royal Society London, Series B. Biological Sciences 270, 1433–1440.Google Scholar
Prokopy, R.J., Averill, A.L., Cooley, S.S. & Roitberg, C.A. (1982) Associative learning in egglaying site selection by apple maggot flies. Science 218, 76–77.Google Scholar
Ratzka, A., Vogel, H., Kliebenstein, D.J., Mitchell-Olds, T. & Kroymann, J. (2002) Disarming the mustard oil bomb. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 99, 11223–11228.Google Scholar
Rausher, M.D. (1982) Population differentiation in Euphydryas editha butterflies: larval adaptation to different hosts. Evolution 36, 581–590.Google Scholar
SAS Institute (2002–2003) The SAS system for Windows. Release 9.1. Cary, NC, SAS Institute.Google Scholar
Schwarz, D., Matta, B.M., Shakir-Botteri, N.L. & McPheron, B.A. (2005) Host shift to an invasive plant triggers rapid animal hybrid speciation. Nature 436, 546–549.Google Scholar
Stenberg, J.A., Hambäck, P.A. & Ericson, L. (2008) Herbivore induced “rent rise” in the host plant may drive a diet breadth enlargement in the tenant. Ecology 89, 126–133.Google Scholar
Strong, D.R. (1979) Biogeographic dynamics of insect-host plant communities. Annual Review of Entomology 24, 89–119.Google Scholar
Tabashnik, B. (1983) Host range evolution: the shift from native legume hosts to Alfalfa by the butterfly, Colias philodice eriphyle. Evolution 37, 150–162.Google Scholar
Thomas, C.D., Ng, D., Singer, M.C., Mallet, J.L.B., Parmesan, C. & Billington, H.L. (1987) Incorporation of a European weed into the diet of a North American herbivore. Evolution 41, 892–901.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thompson, J.N. (1988) Evolutionary ecology of the relationship between oviposition preference and performance of offspring in phytophagous insects. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 47, 3–14.Google Scholar
Via, S. (1999) Reproductive isolation between sympatric host races of pea aphids. I. Gene flow restriction and habitat choice. Evolution 53, 1446–1457.Google Scholar
Wang, H., Guo, W.-F., Zhang, P.-J., Wu, Z.-Y. & Liu, S.-S. (2008) Experience-induced habituation and preference towards non-host plant odors in ovipositing females of a moth. Journal of Chemical Ecology 32, 330–338.Google Scholar
Wasserman, S.S. & Futuyma, D.J. (1981) Evolution of host plant utilization in laboratory populations of the southern cowpea weevil, Callosobruchus maculatus Fabricius (Coleoptera: Bruchidae). Evolution 35, 605–617.Google Scholar
Wheat, C.W., Vogel, H., Wittstock, U., Braby, M.F., Underwood, D. & Mitchell-Olds, T. (2007) The genetic basis of a plant insect coevolutionary key innovation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 104, 20427–20431.Google Scholar
Wiklund, C. (1975) The evolutionary relationship between adult oviposition preferences and larval host range in Papilio machaon L. Oecologia 18, 185–197.Google Scholar
Zhang, P.-J. & Liu, S.-S. (2006) Experience induces a phytophagous insect to lay eggs on a nonhost plant. Journal of Chemical Ecology 32, 745–753.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zhang, P.-J., Liu, S.-S., Wang, H. & Zalucki, M.P. (2007) The influence of early adult experience and larval food restriction on responses toward nonhost plants in moths. Journal of Chemical Ecology 33, 1528–1541.Google Scholar