Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T09:18:21.690Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Notes on the Natural Control of Coleophora laricella, the Larch Case-bearer

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

W. H. Thorpe
Affiliation:
late of Imperial Institute of Entomology.

Extract

This paper consists of a preliminary report on investigations of the parasites of Coleophora laricella in Europe, with a view to their possible utilisation in Canada.

Systematic and biological notes on the more important species are given.

The most promising parasite, Angitia nana, has already been shipped to Canada. It is a solitary internal parasite of the case-bearer larva. Further investigations are necessary before it can be considered safe to introduce any other species.

I am very grateful to Dr. C. Ferrière, of the Imperial Institute of Entomology, for the time and trouble he has given to the work of identifying the parasite material. The late Mr. J. C. Robbins helped materially by kindly carrying on observations while I was absent through illness, and by collecting material in the field. Mr. R. J. Spittle has been of great assistance in the production of the finished drawings, several of them being mainly his own work. A number of the earlier field collections were made by Mr. H. S. Hanson.

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1933

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Baird, A. B. 1923. Some notes on the natural control of the larch sawfly and larch case bearer in New Brunswick in 1922.—Proc. Acadian Ent. Soc. 1922, pp. 158171.Google Scholar
Boden, F. 1902. Die Larche und ihre Motte.—Zeit. f. For. & J.xxxiv, pp. 121–24.Google Scholar
Butler, E. A. 1923. A biology of the British Hemiptera-Heteroptera. London.Google Scholar
Escherich, K. 1931. Die Forstinsekten Mitteleuropas, iii, Berlin, 1931.Google Scholar
Fankhauser, . 1908. Ueber das letzjährige Auftreten forstschädlicher Schmetterlinge in der Schweiz.—Schw. Zeit. f. For., p. 10.Google Scholar
de Gaulle, J. 1908. Catalogue systématique et biologique des Hyménoptères de France.—Paris.Google Scholar
Herrick, G. W. 1912. The larch case bearer.—Bull. Cornell Univ. Agric. Expt. Sta., no. 322, pp. 3952, 15 figs.Google Scholar
Leonardi, G. 19221927. Elenco delle specie di Insetti dannosi e loro parassiti ricordati in Italia fino all'anno 1911.—Pt. I, p. 147, Portici, 1922 ; Pt. II, p. 592, Portici, 1927 ; Pt. III, p. 158, Modena, 1927.Google Scholar
Malenotti, E. 1924. Gli endofagi indigeni contro la Coleophora laricella.—Italia Agricola, Piacenza, 15 09, 1924.Google Scholar
Morley, C. 19031914. Ichneumonologica Britannica.—Vols. I–V.Google Scholar
Parker, H. L. 1924. Recherches sur les formes post-embryonnaires des Chalcidiens.—Ann. Soc. Ent. Fr., xciii, pp. 261379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petherbridge, F. R. & Thorpe, W. H. 1928 Notes on the Capsid Bugs found on species of Ribes.—Ent. Mon. Mag., lxiv, pp. 109112.Google Scholar
Schmiedeknecht, O. 19051908. Opuscula ichneumonologica.Google Scholar
Schmiedeknecht, O. 1930. Die Hymenopteren Nord- und Mitteleuropas.—Jena, p. 1062.Google Scholar
Silvestri, F. 1923. Contribuzioni alla conoscenza dei Tortricidi delle Querce.—Boll. Lab. Zool. Portici, xvii, pp. 41107.Google Scholar
Suire, J. 1927. Notes biologiques sur quelques coléophores (Lep.) de la région de Montpellier.—Bull. Soc. ent. Fr., 1927, pp. 4548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thorpe, W. H. 1930. Observations on the parasites of the Pine Shoot Moth, Rhyacionia buoliana, Schiff.—Bull. Ent. Res., xxi, pp. 387412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolff, M. 1916. Ueber die Chalcidiengattung Chrysocharis Först. (1861). (Hym.)Entom. Mitt., v, pp. 258282.Google Scholar
Yano, M. 1919. Injurious forest insects which have hitherto occurred in great abundance in Japan.—Japan Dept. Agric. & Com. Bur. Forest Rep. vi, pp. 453470.Google Scholar